1.

If P is always against the testimony of Q, then the compound statement P→(P v ~Q) is a __________(a) Tautology(b) Contradiction(c) Contingency(d) None of the mentionedThe question was posed to me in unit test.Asked question is from Logics and Proofs topic in portion The Foundation: Logics and Proofs of Discrete Mathematics

Answer»

Right choice is (a) Tautology

The explanation is: Since either HYPOTHESIS is FALSE or both (hypothesis as WELL as conclusion) are TRUE.



Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions