InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
If P is always against the testimony of Q, then the compound statement P→(P v ~Q) is a __________(a) Tautology(b) Contradiction(c) Contingency(d) None of the mentionedThe question was posed to me in unit test.Asked question is from Logics and Proofs topic in portion The Foundation: Logics and Proofs of Discrete Mathematics |
|
Answer» Right choice is (a) Tautology |
|