All the rest of her children, she said, are on the nuclear blacklist of the dead, all the rest, unless the whole world understands- that peace is a woman. A thousand candles then lit in her starry eyes, and I saw angels bearing a moonlit message : Peace is indeed a pregnant woman Peace is a mother. Why should we avoid wars ?

All the rest of her children, she said, are on the nuclear blacklist

1.	All the rest of her children, she said, are on the nuclear blacklist of the dead, all the rest, unless the whole world understands- that peace is a woman. A thousand candles then lit in her starry eyes, and I saw angels bearing a moonlit message : Peace is indeed a pregnant woman Peace is a mother. Why should we avoid wars ?
Answer» SOLUTION :We should avoid wars because they only lead to DESTRUCTION of human, nature, wildlife and loss of MONEY and PROPERTY.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Answer the following question in 120-150 words: How did Gandhiji succeed in getting justice for the Indigo sharecroppers?
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? What is the extract about?
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? How will the poverty-free world take care of natural disasters ?
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? According to the writer, what would 'the world without poverty' be like?
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? What can we do to help the poor in our society?
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? Rewrite the following sentences in the ways instructed : (i) Temporary problems could be taken care of by market mechanism (Rewrite the sentence beginning with 'Market mechanism...') (ii) In the nineteenth century, there were third-class carriages. (iii) There would still be situations of temporary poverty. (Rewrite it using 'can')
But even in a poverty-free world where every man and woman would earn enough to take care to themselves and their family, there would still be situations of temporary poverty due to a sudden catastrophe or misfortune, a bankruptcy or business downturn leading to failure, or some personal disease or disaster. A poverty-free wold might see a whole group of families, locations, or even regions devastated by some shared disasters, such as floods, fires, cyclones, riots, earthquakes or other disasters. But such temporary problems could be taken care of by the market mechanism through insurance and other self-paying programmes, assisted of course by social-consciousness-driven enterprises. There would always remain differences in lifestyle between people at the bottom of society and those at the top income levels. Yet that difference would be the difference between the middle-class and luxury class, just as on trains in Europe today you have only first class and second-class carriages, whereas in nineteenth century there were third-class and even fourth-class carriages- sometimes with no windows and just hay strewn on the floor. Can we really create a poverty-free world? A world without third-class or fourth-class citizens a world without a hungry, illiterate, barefoot under-class ? What do the following words in the extract mean : (i) devastated (ii) hay
कांच है
(A) Read the following extract and answer the questio:s given below : She smiled, "I found 'em, out by the tree. I picked' em because they' re pretty like you. :, I knew you would like'em, especially the blue." I said, "Daughter, I'm sorry for the way I acted today, I shouldn't have yelled at you that way." She said, "Oh, Mom, that's okay. I love you anyway." I said, "Daughter, I love you too, and I do like the flowers, espedally the blue." What did the mother do when she realized her mistake
(A) Read the following extract and answer the questio:s given below : She smiled, "I found 'em, out by the tree. I picked' em because they' re pretty like you. :, I knew you would like'em, especially the blue." I said, "Daughter, I'm sorry for the way I acted today, I shouldn't have yelled at you that way." She said, "Oh, Mom, that's okay. I love you anyway." I said, "Daughter, I love you too, and I do like the flowers, espedally the blue." In what way do you share your feelings with your parents

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment