You are obviously a hater of democracy, and do not understand how it is supposed to work. If we were in a court of law, I’d object to the QUESTION on the grounds that it is incompetent, irrelevant, immaterial, and goes to matters not in evidence before the court. I’d also go to the Bar Association’s disciplinary committee and file a COMPLAINT, requesting your suspension from the Bar, and the practice of law in this state.

But that’s the reason you asked this question ANONYMOUSLY, isn’t it?

If democracy were all about competition and power play,then the necessity for morality would be greater than we can actually is. But it is not.

Democracy is about governance, directly or indirectly, by a majority of the citizens of a nation. To quote Teddy Roosevelt, “We are the government, You and I.” The morality of a democracy is directly proportional to the morality and the sense of duty of the citizens who MAKE it up.

In the United States, since Ronald Reagan, the sense of duty among our citizens regarding the government, because the conservatives and libertarians are continually intoning their hideous mantra, “Government is the problem, not the solution.” But how can that be when our nation is founded on the doctrine that We the People are the Government.

The answer is it cannot.

Our sense of duty was damaged by events in the 60’s and 70’s including Watergate, Vietnam, and the murders of JFK, RFK, and MLK, Jr.. Our government representatives have done nothing since to re-establish our trust in them at any level. We have failed by being lazy, and not demanding a re-establishment of that trust.

The only good thing I see about DONALD Trump is that his Presidency might get enough of us off of

I can only pray that this will occur.
Hope it will help u Mark me as brainlist plzz