1.

Discuss the arguments advanced in fovour of the regional continuoty model of human origins. Do you think it provides a convincing explanation of the archaeological evidence? Give reasons for your answer.

Answer» <html><body><p></p>Solution :According to the Regional Continuity <a href="https://interviewquestions.tuteehub.com/tag/model-942" style="font-weight:bold;" target="_blank" title="Click to know more about MODEL">MODEL</a>, the <a href="https://interviewquestions.tuteehub.com/tag/homo-487753" style="font-weight:bold;" target="_blank" title="Click to know more about HOMO">HOMO</a> sapiens <a href="https://interviewquestions.tuteehub.com/tag/evolved-2623419" style="font-weight:bold;" target="_blank" title="Click to know more about EVOLVED">EVOLVED</a> in different regions at different rates into modern humans. So there was a variation in the first appearance of modern humans in different parts of the world. It was baised on the regional <a href="https://interviewquestions.tuteehub.com/tag/differences-951427" style="font-weight:bold;" target="_blank" title="Click to know more about DIFFERENCES">DIFFERENCES</a> in the <a href="https://interviewquestions.tuteehub.com/tag/features-985771" style="font-weight:bold;" target="_blank" title="Click to know more about FEATURES">FEATURES</a> of present day humans. The advocates of this view found that the dissimilarities are due to the differences between the Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis populations of the same regions. <br/> The Regional Continuity Model does not give a convincing explanation of the archaeological evidence.</body></html>


Discussion

No Comment Found