Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
Does .net Replace Com? |
|
Answer» .NET has its own mechanisms for type interaction, and they don't USE COM. No IUnknown, no IDL, no typelibs, no registry-based activation. This is mostly GOOD, as a lot of COM was ugly. Generally speaking, .NET allows you to package and use components in a SIMILAR way to COM, but MAKES the whole thing a bit easier. .NET has its own mechanisms for type interaction, and they don't use COM. No IUnknown, no IDL, no typelibs, no registry-based activation. This is mostly good, as a lot of COM was ugly. Generally speaking, .NET allows you to package and use components in a similar way to COM, but makes the whole thing a bit easier. |
|