Explanation:

*Both were Mughal rulers of course.

*Both were most powerful during there respective tenures. Both of them were expansionists who wanted to rule whole of subcontinent,which they almost did.

*Both faced similar problems from neighbouring rulers. Akbar had THREATS from Northwest frontier rulers and Deccan powers,Aurangzeb faced MIGHTY forces of Shivaji.

*Both inducted large number of Hindu nobles.Contrary to many views, Aurangzeb inducted large number of Hindu nobles.

Now,differences. There are number of differences between the two,on many fronts.

*Akbar was secular in true sense and respected all religions while Aurangzeb was orthodox.

*Akbar was brilliant and shrewd RULER who knew that the Hindu country cannot be ruled without Hindu help,while Aurangzeb did not understand the politics that well.

*Akbar loved arts and various art forms. He promoted Painting,Music,Architecture, writing.OTOH,Aurangzeb naturally did not have interest in arts. He discontinued Paintings, History writing.

*Akbar believed in supremacy of Ruler and gave importance to Monarchy,like practices of Zaroka Darshan .OTOH, Aurangzeb believed in simple way of life(QUITE extraordinary).

I have this same book...... PLEASE mark me as Brainaliest