In 1996, a treaty regarding the sharing of the water of Ganga at Farak

1.	In 1996, a treaty regarding the sharing of the water of Ganga at Farakka was signed between India and ______.1. Pakistan2. Bangladesh3. China4. Nepal
Answer» Correct Answer - Option 2 : Bangladesh The correct answer is Bangladesh. The Ganga Treaty between India and Bangladesh is an agreement to share surface waters at the Farakka Barrage near their mutual border. But the treaty, which was signed in 1996, divides water flow without sharing the value and uses of the river between the two countries. It does not even take into consideration the uppermost riparian, Nepal, meaning that it takes neither a whole-of-basin approach to river management nor does it factor in the effects of upstream use of the Ganges on water availability at the Farakka Barrage. The Ganga Treaty illustrates that a legally binding agreement is not the same as meaningful cooperation between the parties. It is solely an arrangement for the volumetric allocation of river flow in the dry season. It does not concern benefit-sharing, nor does it purport to be a comprehensive river sharing and management treaty.

In 1996, a treaty regarding the sharing of the water of Ganga at Farakka was signed between India and ______.1. Pakistan2. Bangladesh3. China4. Nepal

Answer» Correct Answer - Option 2 : Bangladesh

The correct answer is Bangladesh.

The Ganga Treaty between India and Bangladesh is an agreement to share surface waters at the Farakka Barrage near their mutual border.
But the treaty, which was signed in 1996, divides water flow without sharing the value and uses of the river between the two countries.
It does not even take into consideration the uppermost riparian, Nepal, meaning that it takes neither a whole-of-basin approach to river management nor does it factor in the effects of upstream use of the Ganges on water availability at the Farakka Barrage.
The Ganga Treaty illustrates that a legally binding agreement is not the same as meaningful cooperation between the parties.
It is solely an arrangement for the volumetric allocation of river flow in the dry season. It does not concern benefit-sharing, nor does it purport to be a comprehensive river sharing and management treaty.