Match List - I with List - II and identify correct answer from the co

Match List - I with List - II and identify correct answer from the codes given below-List - IList - IIa) A.k. Gopalab Vs state of Madras insitutioni) Equality in admission to educational b) Romesh Tapar Vs state of Madrasii) Parliament's power to amend thec) Sankari Prasad Vs Union of Indiaiii) Procedure for preventive detentiond) Champakam Dorairajan Vs state of Madrasiv) Restriction on Free speech 1. a - i, b - ii, c - iii, d - iv2. a - iii, b - iv, c - ii, d - i3. a - ii, b - iv, c -i, d - iii4. a - iv, b - iii, c - ii, d - i

Answer» Correct Answer - Option 2 : a - iii, b - iv, c - ii, d - i

Case	Decision
A.k. Gopalan Vs state of Madras institution	He challenged his detention by stating that there was a violation of his Fundamental Right which were Article 19, 21 and 22. The Supreme Court held that he was detained according to the procedure established by law and rejected his argument. The supreme court at that point of the time believed that each article was separate in the Indian constitution.
ROMESH THAPAR VS THE STATE OF MADRAS	Freedom of speech and of the press laid at the foundation of all democratic organizations, for without free political discussion no public education,
Sankari Prasad Vs Union of India	Since no limits had been spelled out in Article 368, the power to amend the Constitution included abridgment of even fundamental rights.
Champakam Dorairajan Vs state of Madras	Equality in admission to educational It was held that the communal Govt order constituted a violation of the fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens of India by Article 29(2) of the Constitution of India and was therefore void under Article 13.