InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
Q59. A proposed regulation in a mega city in India requires with future effect the installation in commercial complexes, of sprinklers automatically triggered by the presence of a fire. However, an architect argued that because employees extinguish more than 85% of fires in commercial complexes, sprinklers would only marginally decrease property damage caused by fires. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the architect's argument? |
|
Answer» Q59. A proposed regulation in a mega city in India requires with future effect the installation in commercial complexes, of sprinklers automatically triggered by the presence of a fire. However, an architect argued that because employees extinguish more than 85% of fires in commercial complexes, sprinklers would only marginally decrease property damage caused by fires. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the architect's argument? |
|