1.

Solve : Best upgrade for a 100 bucks??

Answer»

So I have a hundred bucks that I have earned through selling and fixing old computers and I was wondering what the best bet would be for putting it into my media PC/Stuff I dont wanna do on my good PC. Here is what I have now. I assume a better CPU would be best, but would windows 7 be a better investment? Nothing is overclocked but it might be something I look into.
Thanks for the input.

AMD Sempron 145 Processor
- Single core
- 2.8GHz 45W
- L1 Cache 64KB+64KB, L2 Cache 1Mb

Biostar MCP6P3 Board
- NVIDIA GeForce 6150 GPU, On Board Graphic Max. Memory Share Up to 512MB(Under OS By Turbo Cache)
- 4 x SATA2 3Gb/s Connector
- Realtek ALC662 6-Channel HD Audio
- 2 x DDR3 DIMM Memory Slot
- AM3 socket

Geil DDR3 2G Memory
- 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333 (PC3 10666)

Orion HP585D 585W Max Power Supply

Gigabyte GV-R435OC-512I
- ATI Radeon HD 4350 GPU
- 650Mhz
- 64 Bit
- GDDR2 512Mb
- HDMI output

HDD's
- 40G (OS and Few programs)
- 150GB (Media)
- 150GB (Media)

I have another 4GB stick of RAM, but the system is only RUNNING XP SP3 so I cannot go over 3 GB at the moment.The processor and the hard drive you have your operating system installed on are probably the largest bottlenecks.Definately the processor would be first. You can get some decent triple core/quad-core processors for around $100 - which would be much more efficient than your single core. Make sure you get one your motherboard can handle though. You'd probably find one that a 64-bit OS can run on as well, and your next upgrade can then be to Windows 7 64-bit. With that you can use your 6GB of RAM, so that's two birds with one stone right there.Quote from: Raptor on January 26, 2012, 11:58:46 AM

The processor and the hard drive you have your operating system installed on are probably the largest bottlenecks.

I was considering putting the OS on one of the other HDD's for a while now. Would it be a big increase in performance.

I was looking at the Tri-Core by AMD, any thoughts? or is it better to spend the 30 bucks more on the quad?

Ya once I make a few more bucks I will get W7. Is 64 required for the RAM increase or is 32 ok?Depends entirely on the specifications and health of the 40GB and the other DRIVES. List 'm and I'll have a look.This is probably overkill but its what I got from Everest


HDD
-Drive #1 - Maxtor 2F040L0 (38 GB)
-Drive #2 - HITACHI HTS541616J9S SCSI Disk Device (149 GB)
-Drive #3 - Maxtor 6 L160M0 SCSI Disk Device (149 GB)

DRIVE #1

Model IDMaxtor 2F040L0
RevisionVAM51JJ0
Parameters79656 cylinders, 16 heads, 63 sectors per track, 512 BYTES per sector
LBA Sectors80293248
Buffer2 MB (Dual Ported, Read Ahead)
Multiple Sectors16
ECC Bytes57
Max. PIO Transfer ModePIO 4
Max. UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 6 (ATA-133)
Active UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 6 (ATA-133)
Unformatted Capacity39206 MB

ATA Device Physical Info
ManufacturerMaxtor
Hard Disk FamilyFireball 3
Form Factor3.5"
Formatted Capacity40 GB
Disks1
Recording Surfaces1
Physical Dimensions146.1 x 101.6 x 17.5 mm
Max. Weight509 g
Average Rotational Latency5.5 ms
Rotational Speed5400 RPM
InterfaceUltra-ATA/133
Buffer-to-Host Data Rate133 MB/s
Buffer Size2 MB

DRIVE #2

Model IDHitachi HTS541616J9SA00
RevisionSB4OC74P
Parameters310101 cylinders, 16 heads, 63 sectors per track, 512 bytes per sector
LBA Sectors312581808
Buffer7516 KB (Dual Ported, Read Ahead)
Multiple Sectors16
ECC Bytes4
Max. PIO Transfer ModePIO 4
Max. UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 5 (ATA-100)
Active UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 5 (ATA-100)
Unformatted Capacity152628 MB

DRIVE #3

FieldValue
ATA Device Properties
Model IDMaxtor 6L160M0
RevisionBANC1G10
Parameters310020 cylinders, 16 heads, 63 sectors per track, 512 bytes per sector
LBA Sectors312500000
Buffer8 MB (Dual Ported, Read Ahead)
Multiple Sectors16
ECC Bytes4
Max. PIO Transfer ModePIO 4
Max. UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 6 (ATA-133)
Active UDMA Transfer ModeUDMA 6 (ATA-133)
Unformatted Capacity152588 MB

ATA Device Physical Info
ManufacturerMaxtor
Hard Disk FamilyDiamondMax 10
Form Factor3.5"
Formatted Capacity160 GB
Physical Dimensions147 x 101.6 x 26.1 mm
Max. Weight630 g
Average Rotational Latency4.17 ms
Rotational Speed7200 RPM
Average Seek9 ms
InterfaceSATA
Buffer-to-Host Data Rate150 MB/s
Buffer Size8 MBWow. Maxtor Fireball ... Unlike the name would suggest, they're not very fast. It's a 5400RPM drive. (The 40GB one).
The Hitach is also 5400 RPM.. Is that a 2.5"?

You should use Hard Disk Sentinel to diagnose all of those drives and see which one is healthiest.

I'd recommend the other Maxtor. It's 7200RPM and has a SATA interface. Arguably the most superior drive in your fleet.

Sentinal says the drives are all HEALTHY.
The hitachi is a 2.5 and is SATA
But yes the good maxtor is getting the OS next.
Free upgrade haha. Now that still leaves me with a 100 bucks.I'd go for a second hand AMD Athlon X2 and stash the rest of the money in case something breaks down in the future. Unless you need it for gaming in which case I'd go for an AMD Phenom (new).

Make sure you check the compatability list of the mainboard.I am more of an xbox gamer but i would do it on the pc if it was good enoguh. Looking at the quad core.
I do use some GIS stuff that is cpu intensive, so its an upgrade there.
Thanks a lot everyone


Discussion

No Comment Found