1.

Solve : Intel i5 vs i7?

Answer»

Looking at Intel's i5 2500 (sandy bridge) and i7 2600 (sandy bridge) I notice three main differences:

1. The i7 has twice the threads
2. The i7 has better intergrated graphics (if that works how I think it does then it's something not that useful)
3. £80 more for the i7
[hardly worth mentioning the 100MHz clock speed difference]

When CONSIDERING this processor for a machine with it's own dedicated graphics card, that takes the intergrated graphics out of the EQUATION. So are the 4 extra threads worth it? What performance difference would one expect to see?

With Intel's i7 970 & 990X I can't begin to justify the money for these, they look awesome but not £800 awesome.Processors Have neither threads or integrated graphics.By threads, you mean hyper-threading, right? According to the article I've linked to here, Hyper-threading is disabled on the i5 processors but is enabled on i7's. The article refers to Intel's "Sandy Bridge" processors. I don't know whether the i5 and i7 processors come in other flavors. The article: Core i5 vs. Core i7: What's the Difference?Yeah I did think "w t f! integrated graphics on a CPU?" whilst reading this: http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/prods/components/processors/intelcorei3,i5andi71155socket/intel/cm8062300833908.html
I assumed that they somehow improved CPUs to make floating-point and matrix calcs faster/easier. To be honest I did think that it was a bit of a leap in technology.

I thought that threads were on the CPU though.

Quote from: soybean on February 25, 2011, 08:48:34 AM

By threads, you mean hyper-threading, right? According to the article I've linked to here, Hyper-threading is disabled on the i5 processors but is enabled on i7's. The article refers to Intel's "Sandy Bridge" processors. I don't know whether the i5 and i7 processors come in other flavors. The article: Core i5 vs. Core i7: What's the Difference?

Nice article thanks. Also I have no idea. I'm still trying to get my head around threading.


According to this the i7 has a much higher benchmark. http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.htmlActually, there are a number of different i5 and i7 processors and frankly it can be a little confusing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Intel_processorsQuote from: rthompson80819 on February 25, 2011, 12:34:45 PM
Actually, there are a number of different i5 and i7 processors and frankly it can be a little confusing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Intel_processors

I know that's why I was talking about the Intel i5 2500 sandy bridge and Intel i7 2600 sandy bridge processors in particular.Either way the i7 is a clearly superior CPU...

Only your budget can decide thi though...i7 is the best, but NewEgg has 10 different i7 processors priced from $279 to $1,000 depending on specs.

It is all about your budget.

Yes but the question is does the performance warrent the expense? By the look of things yes.

Quote from: rthompson80819 on February 25, 2011, 04:18:29 PM
i7 is the best, but NewEgg has 10 different i7 processors priced from $279 to $1,000 depending on specs.

It is all about your budget.

Would people please read my opening post because we're talking about two specific CPU's Intel's i5 2500 (sandy bridge) and Intel's i7 2600 (sandy bridge)

[Sorry rthompson80819, but you're the second person to make that MISTAKE.]If you would check out the spec sheets on Intel's site on the two processors you mentioned you would see that the i7 is better than the i5. If it's worth the extra money only you can decide.

I think everybody is trying to tell you, you get what you pay for.So.. What will the i9 come with?
Integrated espresso maker?
No. Just graphics
Quote
Tick, the CPU and GPU get integrated into the same 32nm die, tock, they both go down to 22nm with the latter gaining DIRECTX 11 support. Intel's only just unveiled its Sandy Bridge processors, but the next update to the... blah blah blah

Reference for integrated GPU thing.


I would think with all the heat it would generate,
- it should make a cup of javae in 5 min.


Discussion

No Comment Found