InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
Solve : Steve Jobs FBI dossier? |
|
Answer» Steve Jobs FBI dossier: Past DRUG use, bomb threat and poor grades. http://www.periscopepost.com/2012/02/steve-jobs-fbi-dossier-past-drug-use-bomb-threat-and-poor-grades/ The FBI has released a secret dossier on Steve Jobs that reveals an apparently darker side of the late APPLE co-founder. The 191-page file, made public after a Freedom of Information request, includes allegations from friends and acquaintances that Jobs was a “deceptive individual” who experimented with drugs and was a negligent father. If it is a slow news day, - this will be on the 6 o'clock news tonight.John Carmack Stole Apple II's... or rather tried to, from a school. basically none of this is really news. Arguably, it might be news to some people, and if you tell a Mac/Apple fanboy they might scratch you with their nails until they get tired and fall asleep, but there are some THINGS at play here: 1. Nobody is perfect. We all have dark secrets. For example mine involves pickles, a toaster, two jars of mayonnaise, and a toothbrush. Some people have drinking problems, mental stability issues, etc. 2. After somebody dies, especially famous people, it suddenly becomes politically incorrect to say things you could have easily said before they died. For example, if I had said that Steve Jobs was a jerk before he died, I would get a clamour of agreement; if I said it after he died, there would be a clamour of agreement until somebody says "but he died!" and talks of "respect for the dead". If I didn't respect somebody when they were alive, I'm not sure why I would when they are dead. Another, which MAKES sense for people you knew personally, is the "But they can't defend themselves now" thing. On the other hand, I doubt if I had said mean things about Steve Jobs when he was alive he would have taken personal offense and defended himself by posting responses on a forum. 3. For famous/semi-famous people, they are usually well-regarded not necessarily because they deserve to be but because they have loads of people that are hired pretty much for the sole purpose of making them likable. A few months after their death when people start rebutting the tributes made to what seemed like a "great man" people are almost surprised when they learn that, no, he couldn't crush diamonds using his buttocks. He was just a person, and like any other person he had flaws, even big ones, and naturally the people with personal experience dealing with that persons less than stellar qualities are sick and tired of hearing people whose only experience with the person is through their overpriced products, magazine articles call them great or world-changing, and act like they actually knew the person when all they knew was the image of that person designed by their public relations people. I must really say, what the guy did in his private life doesn't really concern me. |
|