What Is The Auto Keyword Good For In C++?

1.	What Is The Auto Keyword Good For In C++?
Answer» LOCAL variables OCCUR within a scope; they are "local" to a function. They are often called automatic variables because they automatically come into being when the scope is entered and automatically go away when the scope closes. The keyword auto MAKES this explicit, but local variables DEFAULT to auto auto auto auto so it is never necessary to declare something as an auto auto auto auto. Local variables occur within a scope; they are "local" to a function. They are often called automatic variables because they automatically come into being when the scope is entered and automatically go away when the scope closes. The keyword auto makes this explicit, but local variables default to auto auto auto auto so it is never necessary to declare something as an auto auto auto auto.

Answer»

LOCAL variables OCCUR within a scope; they are "local" to a function. They are often called automatic variables because they automatically come into being when the scope is entered and automatically go away when the scope closes. The keyword auto MAKES this explicit, but local variables DEFAULT to auto auto auto auto so it is never necessary to declare something as an auto auto auto auto.

Local variables occur within a scope; they are "local" to a function. They are often called automatic variables because they automatically come into being when the scope is entered and automatically go away when the scope closes. The keyword auto makes this explicit, but local variables default to auto auto auto auto so it is never necessary to declare something as an auto auto auto auto.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Write A Code Snippet To Display An Integer In A Binary Format?
Explain The Concept Of Dynamic Allocation Of Memory?
Write About The Local Class And Mention Its Use?
Write About A Nested Class And Mention Its Use?
Define Pure Virtual Function?
How Does List R; Differs From List R();?
Explain How Would You Handle A Situation Where You Cannot Call The Destructor Of A Local Explicitly?
What Is The Sequence Of Destruction Of Local Objects?
Define A Conversion Constructor?
Is It Possible To Pass An Object Of The Same Class In Place Of Object Reference To The Copy Constructor?