Answer» - As a king, Harshvardhana can be considered better than Pulkeshi II.
- Harshvardhana was ambitious, valiant, religious and lover of art as well as education.
- He was equally fond of literature.
- Also, he was a great donor.
- He made various constructions for the welfare of his public.
- His subjects were very happy, satisfied and prosperous.
- Harshvardhana had a deep knowledge about the rule, administration and welfare of his kingdom.
- He had appointed various ministers to look after his kingdom.
- Thus, he was an efficient king.
- On the other hand, Pulkeshi II was an over ambitious king.
- He spent most of his time in expanding his kingdom by conquering new territories.
- Hence, he did not find enough time for administration and public welfare.
- He had a huge kingdom but he did not know how to manage it efficiently like Harshvardhana.
- Hence Harshvardhana was a better king.
|
