With the increase in the global issues the scope of political science

1.	With the increase in the global issues the scope of political science is widening day by day. Recently the leaders of different countries and political scientists around the world are giving more attention towards issues connected with environment such as pollution, climate change, global warming etc. Do you think these matters are to be looked after by these personalities instead of scientists. Give your reasons.
Answer» Truly speaking, since those things are related to geography, it is the scientists in that area that should handle them. But politically also they have significance. The repercussions of these problems will affect the social and economic spheres of people. Their results will be visible in politics also. Here are some examples: Reduced agricultural lands will affect food production. Drinking polluted water will bring health problems. According to the Human Development Report of the UNDP, some 1.2 billion people do not access to pure water. Deforestation destroys biodiversity. Forests help in maintaining the climate, in the distribution of water and biodiversity on earth. The reduction in the ozone layer adversely affects the environment and people. The pollution of shores is on the increase globally. All these problems are political important. But they are not something that can be solved by the action of any single government. Therefore they are part of world politics. The biggest questions are: Who is responsible for the destruction of the environment? Who will its price Who can set it right? Who has greater power? Thus they all are things to be thought deeply.

With the increase in the global issues the scope of political science is widening day by day. Recently the leaders of different countries and political scientists around the world are giving more attention towards issues connected with environment such as pollution, climate change, global warming etc. Do you think these matters are to be looked after by these personalities instead of scientists. Give your reasons.

Answer»

Truly speaking, since those things are related to geography, it is the scientists in that area that should handle them. But politically also they have significance. The repercussions of these problems will affect the social and economic spheres of people.

Their results will be visible in politics also. Here are some examples:

Reduced agricultural lands will affect food production.
Drinking polluted water will bring health problems. According to the Human Development Report of the UNDP, some 1.2 billion people do not access to pure water.
Deforestation destroys biodiversity. Forests help in maintaining the climate, in the distribution of water and biodiversity on earth.
The reduction in the ozone layer adversely affects the environment and people.
The pollution of shores is on the increase globally. All these problems are political important. But they are not something that can be solved by the action of any single government. Therefore they are part of world politics.

The biggest questions are:

Who is responsible for the destruction of the environment?

Who will its price Who can set it right? Who has greater power?

Thus they all are things to be thought deeply.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment