| 1. |
1). Vroom's expectancy theory of motivation is not about self-interest in rewards but about the associations people make towards expected outcomes and the contribution they feel they can make towards those outcomes.2). Vroom's expectancy theory of motivation is not about self-interest in rewards and about the associations people make towards expected outcomes but about the contribution they feel they can make towards those outcomes.3). Vroom's expectancy theory of motivation is not about self-interest in rewards and about the associations people make towards expected outcomes, it is about the contribution they feel they can make towards those outcomes.4). Vroom's expectancy theory of motivation is not about self-interest in rewards but about the associations people make towards expected outcomes while the contribution they feel they can make towards those outcomes. |
|
Answer» A comma does not fit correctly in option 3. Instead of comma, we should use a SEMICOLON to join two independent clauses. ( … make towards expected outcomes; it is about the contribution…) Also, while forming the compound sentence, we should not change the meaning being conveyed. Options 1 and 3 suggest that Vroom’s theory is not about the ASSOCIATIONS people make towards expected outcomes. This is incorrect and hence we can eliminate these options. Vroom’s theory is, in fact,about the associations people make towards expected outcomes. Among all the options, option 1 expresses the meaning correctly while MAINTAINING grammatical congruency. Therefore, the CORRECT answer is option 1. |
|