Can Another System Have “the Feel Of Linux”?

1.	Can Another System Have “the Feel Of Linux”?
Answer» There is no such thing as the “feel of Linux” because Linux has no user interfaces. Like any MODERN KERNEL, Linux is a base for running programs; user interfaces BELONG ELSEWHERE in the system. HUMAN interaction with GNU/Linux always goes through other programs, and the “feel” comes from them. There is no such thing as the “feel of Linux” because Linux has no user interfaces. Like any modern kernel, Linux is a base for running programs; user interfaces belong elsewhere in the system. Human interaction with GNU/Linux always goes through other programs, and the “feel” comes from them.

Answer»

There is no such thing as the “feel of Linux” because Linux has no user interfaces. Like any MODERN KERNEL, Linux is a base for running programs; user interfaces BELONG ELSEWHERE in the system. HUMAN interaction with GNU/Linux always goes through other programs, and the “feel” comes from them.

There is no such thing as the “feel of Linux” because Linux has no user interfaces. Like any modern kernel, Linux is a base for running programs; user interfaces belong elsewhere in the system. Human interaction with GNU/Linux always goes through other programs, and the “feel” comes from them.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Since Much Of Gnu Comes From Unix, Shouldn't Gnu Give Credit To Unix By Using “unix” In Its Name?
Should The Gnu/name Convention Be Applied To All Programs That Are Gpl'ed?
Why Did You Wait So Long Before Asking People To Use The Name Gnu/linux?
Did The Gnu Project Condemn And Oppose Use Of Linux In The Early Days?
Why Not Just Say “linux Is The Gnu Kernel” And Release Some Existing Version Of Gnu/linux Under The Name “gnu”?
Why Not Make A Gnu Distribution Of Linux (sic) And Call That Gnu/linux?
Wouldn't It Be Better To Reserve The Name “gnu/linux” For Distributions That Are Purely Free Software? After All, That Is The Ideal Of Gnu?
Wouldn't It Be More Effective To Ask Companies Such As Mandrake, Red Hat And Ibm To Call Their Distributions “gnu/linux” Rather Than Asking Individuals?
My Distro's Official Name Is “foobar Linux”; Isn't It Wrong To Call The Distro Anything But “foobar Linux”?
My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really Linux?