My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really

1.	My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really Linux?
Answer» It means that the people who make the “Foobar Linux” DISTRO are repeating the common mistake. We appreciate that distributions like DEBIAN, Dragora, Musix, Trisquel, and Venenux have ADOPTED GNU/Linux as part of their official name, and we hope that if you are involved with a DIFFERENT distribution, you will ENCOURAGE it to do the same. It means that the people who make the “Foobar Linux” distro are repeating the common mistake. We appreciate that distributions like Debian, Dragora, Musix, Trisquel, and Venenux have adopted GNU/Linux as part of their official name, and we hope that if you are involved with a different distribution, you will encourage it to do the same.

My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really Linux?

Answer»

It means that the people who make the “Foobar Linux” DISTRO are repeating the common mistake. We appreciate that distributions like DEBIAN, Dragora, Musix, Trisquel, and Venenux have ADOPTED GNU/Linux as part of their official name, and we hope that if you are involved with a DIFFERENT distribution, you will ENCOURAGE it to do the same.

It means that the people who make the “Foobar Linux” distro are repeating the common mistake. We appreciate that distributions like Debian, Dragora, Musix, Trisquel, and Venenux have adopted GNU/Linux as part of their official name, and we hope that if you are involved with a different distribution, you will encourage it to do the same.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Since Much Of Gnu Comes From Unix, Shouldn't Gnu Give Credit To Unix By Using “unix” In Its Name?
Should The Gnu/name Convention Be Applied To All Programs That Are Gpl'ed?
Why Did You Wait So Long Before Asking People To Use The Name Gnu/linux?
Did The Gnu Project Condemn And Oppose Use Of Linux In The Early Days?
Why Not Just Say “linux Is The Gnu Kernel” And Release Some Existing Version Of Gnu/linux Under The Name “gnu”?
Why Not Make A Gnu Distribution Of Linux (sic) And Call That Gnu/linux?
Wouldn't It Be Better To Reserve The Name “gnu/linux” For Distributions That Are Purely Free Software? After All, That Is The Ideal Of Gnu?
Wouldn't It Be More Effective To Ask Companies Such As Mandrake, Red Hat And Ibm To Call Their Distributions “gnu/linux” Rather Than Asking Individuals?
My Distro's Official Name Is “foobar Linux”; Isn't It Wrong To Call The Distro Anything But “foobar Linux”?
My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really Linux?