Gnu Is A Small Fraction Of The System Nowadays, So Why Should We Ment

1.	Gnu Is A Small Fraction Of The System Nowadays, So Why Should We Mention It?
Answer» In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main” REPOSITORY of the gNewSense GNU/LINUX distribution. Linux made up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly to calling it “Linux”. GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, and Linux is an even smaller fraction. But they are the system's CORE; the system was made by combining them. Thus, the name “GNU/Linux” REMAINS appropriate. In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main” repository of the gNewSense GNU/Linux distribution. Linux made up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly to calling it “Linux”. GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, and Linux is an even smaller fraction. But they are the system's core; the system was made by combining them. Thus, the name “GNU/Linux” remains appropriate.

Gnu Is A Small Fraction Of The System Nowadays, So Why Should We Mention It?

Answer»

In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main” REPOSITORY of the gNewSense GNU/LINUX distribution. Linux made up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly to calling it “Linux”.

GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, and Linux is an even smaller fraction. But they are the system's CORE; the system was made by combining them. Thus, the name “GNU/Linux” REMAINS appropriate.

In 2008, we found that GNU packages made up 15% of the “main” repository of the gNewSense GNU/Linux distribution. Linux made up 1.5%. So the same argument would apply even more strongly to calling it “Linux”.

GNU is a small fraction of the system nowadays, and Linux is an even smaller fraction. But they are the system's core; the system was made by combining them. Thus, the name “GNU/Linux” remains appropriate.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Since Much Of Gnu Comes From Unix, Shouldn't Gnu Give Credit To Unix By Using “unix” In Its Name?
Should The Gnu/name Convention Be Applied To All Programs That Are Gpl'ed?
Why Did You Wait So Long Before Asking People To Use The Name Gnu/linux?
Did The Gnu Project Condemn And Oppose Use Of Linux In The Early Days?
Why Not Just Say “linux Is The Gnu Kernel” And Release Some Existing Version Of Gnu/linux Under The Name “gnu”?
Why Not Make A Gnu Distribution Of Linux (sic) And Call That Gnu/linux?
Wouldn't It Be Better To Reserve The Name “gnu/linux” For Distributions That Are Purely Free Software? After All, That Is The Ideal Of Gnu?
Wouldn't It Be More Effective To Ask Companies Such As Mandrake, Red Hat And Ibm To Call Their Distributions “gnu/linux” Rather Than Asking Individuals?
My Distro's Official Name Is “foobar Linux”; Isn't It Wrong To Call The Distro Anything But “foobar Linux”?
My Distro Is Called “foobar Linux”; Doesn't That Show It's Really Linux?