In A Strict Liability Tort, It Is Necessary To Prove That: – InterviewSolution

InterviewSolution

1.

In A Strict Liability Tort, It Is Necessary To Prove That:

Answer»

In a strict liability TORT, the plaintiff NEED only prove that the specific ACT occurred (ALONG with the fact that that act caused a loss).

In a strict liability tort, the plaintiff need only prove that the specific act occurred (along with the fact that that act caused a loss).

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Corporation A Was Issued A Loan By Bank B. Corporation A Is Now Claiming That Its Chief Financial Officer Did Not Have The Authority To Obtain The Loan And Therefore Is Refusing To Honour The Terms Of This Bank Loan. Based On The Indoor Management Rule:
What Are Dividends?
Professionals Are Liable For Negligent Misrepresentation When They Make An Incorrect Statement:
A Professional’s Duty Of Care May Arise From:
In Terms Of Product Liability, There Is A Duty Of Care On A Canadian Manufacturer To Give Consumers Warning:
This Complete Defence To A Tort Action Asserts That The Plaintiff Freely Agreed To Accept The Risk Of Injury Or Loss:
Under The Thin Skull Theory, Plaintiffs Who Are Unusually Vulnerable Due To Physical Or Psychological Infirmities Would:
Under Tort Law, A Loss May Be Held To Be Too Remote If:
Under Tort Law, A Reasonable Person Is Defined As:
You Insist That A Supplier Send A Rush Shipment Of Parts, Thereby Leaving The Supplier Out-of Stock And Unable To Send Parts To The Plaintiff With Whom It Had A Prior Agreement Of Sale. You Are: