InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
You Insist That A Supplier Send A Rush Shipment Of Parts, Thereby Leaving The Supplier Out-of Stock And Unable To Send Parts To The Plaintiff With Whom It Had A Prior Agreement Of Sale. You Are: |
|
Answer» The BEHAVIOUR constitutes interference with contractual RELATIONS since you PERSUADED a third party (the SUPPLIER) to break its CONTRACT with the plaintiff. Intimidation involves threat to commit an unlawful act. The behaviour constitutes interference with contractual relations since you persuaded a third party (the supplier) to break its contract with the plaintiff. Intimidation involves threat to commit an unlawful act. |
|