Point out the wrong statement.(a) Simple random sampling of time series is probably the best way to resample times series data.(b) Three parameters are used for time series splitting(c) Horizon parameter is the number of consecutive values in test set sample(d) All of the mentionedI got this question in an online interview.This interesting question is from caret topic in portion Machine Learning of Data Science

Point out the wrong statement.(a) Simple random sampling of time serie

1.	Point out the wrong statement.(a) Simple random sampling of time series is probably the best way to resample times series data.(b) Three parameters are used for time series splitting(c) Horizon parameter is the number of consecutive values in test set sample(d) All of the mentionedI got this question in an online interview.This interesting question is from caret topic in portion Machine Learning of Data Science
Answer» The correct answer is (a) Simple RANDOM sampling of TIME series is probably the best WAY to resample TIMES series data. The explanation: Simple random sampling of time series is probably not the best way to resample times series data.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

We have below data with 10 transactions. What is the “Lift Ratio” for “if white then blue”?
Transactions#FaceplateColorsPurchased1redwhitegreen2whiteorange3whiteblue4redwhiteorange5redblue6whiteblue7whiteorange8redwhitebluegreen9redwhiteblue10yellow
We have below data with 10 transactions. What is the performance measure “Confidence” for “if white then blue”?
Transaction#FaceplateColorsPurchased1redwhitegreen2whiteorange3whiteblue4redwhiteorange5redblue6whiteblue7whiteorange8redwhitebluegreen9redwhiteblue10yellow
We have below data with 10 transactions. What is the performance measure “Support” for “if white then blue”?
UnivSATTop10AcceptSFRatioExpensesGradRateBrown131089221322,70494CalTech141510025663,57581CMU12606259925,02672Columbia131076241231,51088Comell128083331321,86490Dartmouth134089231032,16295Duke131590301231,58595Georgetown125574241220,12692Harvard140091141139,52597JohnHopkins13057544758,69187MIT138094301034,87091Northwestern126085391128,05289NotreDame125581421315,12294PennState108138541810,18580Priceton13759114830,22095Purdue10052890199,06669Stanford136090201236,45093TexasA&M10754967258,70467UCBerkeley124095401715,14078UChicago129075501338,38087UMichigan118065681615,47085UPenn128580361127,55390UVA122577441413,34992UWisconsin108540691511,85771Yale137595191143,51496
SATAverageSAT score of new freshmenTop10% new freshmen in top 10% of highschool classAccept% of applicants accepted SFRatioStudent to faculty ratioSExpensesEstimated annual expensesGradRateGraduation Rate(%)
Consider universities dataset below. Data for 25 undergraduate programs at business schools in US universities in 1995. The dataset excludes image variables (student satisfaction, employer satisfaction, dean’s opinions, etc.). Given this
We have trained/executed our model with the given dataset. We have noticed that we have used a regression model and it is suffering from multicollinearity. Is it possible to improvise on our model without losing any information?
When is Ridge regression used and when is Lasso regression (ideally)?

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment