Q. Anandpur was a sovereign state surrounded by two strong countries A and B. Due to attack by Country A, Anandpur had asked for support from Country B. With the effort of Country B , Anandpurhad foiled the attack of Country A.To save itself from future attack, Anandpur had accepted the sovereignty of Country B with certain conditions. Under these conditions, any law enacted by Country B for Anandpur could be applicable only after consultation with people of Anandpur. Meanwhile, Country A had adopted the policy of terrorism to destabilise country B and Anandpur. Many civilians and Army personnel had lost their lives due to inhumanistic and aggressive policy of Country A. Country A had also supported the separatist movement in Anandpur. Even after the effort of Country B, the human development index was very poor in Anandpur. Due to violence and terrorism, Industrial development was also very poor in Anandpur. There was rising discontent among youth due to the high rate of unemployment in Anandpur. Due to the misconception, People of Anandpur thought that in place of Country A , Country B was responsible for all their misery and Poverty. Country B had tried every effort to convince the people of Anandpur that Country A was responsible for all their miseries. At last, after exhausting all effort, Country B has totally revoked all the concessions provided to Anandpur and acquired the whole region of Anandpur without consulting the people of that region. Arguments given by Country B were that It was done for a temporary period to eradicate the roots of terrorism and improving the human development of that region. In this Context: Discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case. Discuss the ethical dilemmas involved in the above case Was the decision taken by country B regarding terrorism eradication ethically right?