Answer» I think Peta has totally gotten off TRACK from what they stand for.
http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/18704797/detail.html#-
Which one of the below does PETA stand for??
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
People Eating Tasty AnimalsPeople for the Ethical Treatment of Animals but the other sound plausible too hehe well i suppose what they did was to attract attention from the people in Texas seeing as they are probably the "least-animal friendly" state, but i dunnoSome people have WAY too much time on their hands...OK so I made this into a poll to see what we should start calling PETA.
Yeas Patio I do have way too much free time on my hands. Possum Eatin Time Association.
Another possiblity is:
People for the Ethical treatment of alka-seltzer
You throw it in the cup, it is torn apart by the hungry piranha that is Oxygen, and a person drinks it. Is there any crueller death? (I can think of one, drowning in a giant tub of alka-seltzer. That stuff HURTS when it goes up your nose...)
I think some of these people don't realize that the Human body is designed as an omnivore. If they don't want to eat meat, that's FINE, but to actually try to say it's healthier is ridiculous- In order to get the same nutrition using only vegetables as a meal containing meats requires a lot of planning and knowledge about the nutritional VALUE of plants.
And of course as you've said mroilfield they are DEFINITELY going off-track with what they believe. People might mistake it for a same-sex rally... Every one is so obsessed with animals being used for food... Has anyone listened lately to the anguish in a head of Broccoli being de-capitated ? ? I thought not...that reminds me of that quote.
"if trees screamed, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? Maybe, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason."Ahh yes. Trees.
|