InterviewSolution
| 1. |
Solve : Help with my PC build? |
|
Answer» I really like the looks of my build as it is, but I need to save ~$100-$150 on it. I STRONGLY urge AGAINST any used parts (unless they are from your own old systems). And "$150 ? ? Why not mow some lawns...you could get that in 1 busy day...or 2..." Is it just me or does the Moderators in this forum trolling people? If you cant say anything useful, rather don't say anything at all. This posting is a Troll it's not feasible to shave anything...step up and make it work somehow.The others are right that your pc is on the edge. It's good as it is and if you shave 150$ from it, you will lose a lot performance. You can do that by changing the GPU and CPU though:( 4gb of ram are far from enough these days. No SSD is also absolutely stupid. Difference between gtx 1050 and gtx 1060 is huge for example. Cpu is from the chep ones also. Quote 4gb of ram are far from enough these days. No SSD is also absolutely stupid. RAM Comment ..... I'd stick with the 8GB as a minimum for a modern gaming setup. I have a system with 4GB and I have run down to less than 300mb free of 4GB. Some games are heavy RAM hitters. Additionally more RAM = LESSER paging ( virtual memory = extra read/writes to a SSD or HDD ) Lesser RAM if there is a need for lots of memory and not enough then the drive will be worked harder to shuffle out data to a drive so that other data of greater priority can be dealt with in RAM, and then RAM injected with the info that was passed into the virtual memory. Games would likely run on the system with 4GB RAM, but better performance would be with the system with 8GB and your pairing of 2 x 4GB means you will be able to take advantage of dual-channel memory configuration for best performance. Additionally there is not much money saved in dropping to 4GB, so I DONT feel going with 4GB is worth crippling the systems memory to 4GB. SSD Comment .... This comment of "No SSD is also absolutely stupid" makes no sense at all. You have an SSD in your build. SSD's = best performance at a cost of lesser storage capacity. |
|