Saved Bookmarks
| 1. |
Solve : Running html to test it via my browser - beginner? |
|
Answer» Quote from: BC_Programmer on June 15, 2012, 02:24:58 AM yeah my question was more the why on the human side, I just wonder if it was a purposeful omission or whether it was simply overlooked. I strongly suspect the latter. The dev forums are failrly quiet on the subject. I can't think of any reason why someone would deliberately allow <em> and omit <strong> (unless they have a pathological dislike of HTML elements with more than a couple of letters)!< em> is probably USED as < i> is not valid XHTML, whereas the substitution for < strong> is just < b> (which is still valid) so they probably DECIDED < strong> wasn't needed. Quote from: KPAC on June 15, 2012, 11:17:29 AM < i> is not valid XHTMLThe i entity is PRESENT in the XHTML-1.0-Strict document type definition. Quote from: BC_Programmer on June 15, 2012, 12:17:54 PM The i entity is present in the XHTML-1.0-Strict document type definition.Hmmm...always thought they replaced it with < em > in XHTML, not that XHTML is that important ANYMORE...Thanks to every one |
|