V. Answer the following questions.1. What do you understand by the pri

1.	V. Answer the following questions.1. What do you understand by the primary and secondary sources of study of modernhistory?2. How will the information derived from old newspapers be different from that foundin official reports?3. Why did the British preserve official documents?4. What is the meaning of colonialism? Explain.5. Explain some of the important events and developments that took place after the death of Aurangzeb.
Answer» Answer: 1)Primary sources are the historical documents used by historians as evidence. ... In contrast, a secondary source is the typical history book which may discuss a person, event or other historical TOPIC. A good secondary source uses primary sources as evidence. Explanation: 2)Police reports represents the official view of the state about an event and thus may be biased and PREJUDICED. while on the other hand the old NEWSPAPERS mostly represented the facts as they are and recorded the events from the view point of common man. 3) The British believed that by preserving official documents, it would be easier for them or any other persons to know about the decisions taken in the past. One can study the notes and reports that were prepared in the past. Their copies may be prepared and used in present time if needed so. 4)Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad[3] (3 November 1618 – 3 March 1707),[1] commonly known by the sobriquet Aurangzeb (Persian: "Ornament of the Throne")[3] or by his regnal title Alamgir (Persian: "Conqueror of the World"),[4] was the sixth Mughal emperor, who ruled over almost the entire Indian subcontinent for a period of 49 years.[5][6][7] Widely considered to be the last effective ruler of the Mughal Empire,[8] Aurangzeb compiled the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, and was among the few monarchs to have fully established Sharia law and Islamic economics throughout the Indian subcontinent.[9][10] He was an accomplished military leader[11] whose rule has been the subject of praise, THOUGH he has also been described as the most controversial ruler in Indian history.[12] I THINK MY ANSWER IS HELPFUL FOR YOU

V. Answer the following questions.1. What do you understand by the primary and secondary sources of study of modernhistory?2. How will the information derived from old newspapers be different from that foundin official reports?3. Why did the British preserve official documents?4. What is the meaning of colonialism? Explain.5. Explain some of the important events and developments that took place after the death of Aurangzeb.

Answer»

Answer:

1)Primary sources are the historical documents used by historians as evidence. ... In contrast, a secondary source is the typical history book which may discuss a person, event or other historical TOPIC. A good secondary source uses primary sources as evidence.

Explanation:

2)Police reports represents the official view of the state about an event and thus may be biased and PREJUDICED. while on the other hand the old NEWSPAPERS mostly represented the facts as they are and recorded the events from the view point of common man.

3) The British believed that by preserving official documents, it would be easier for them or any other persons to know about the decisions taken in the past. One can study the notes and reports that were prepared in the past. Their copies may be prepared and used in present time if needed so.

4)Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad[3] (3 November 1618 – 3 March 1707),[1] commonly known by the sobriquet Aurangzeb (Persian: "Ornament of the Throne")[3] or by his regnal title Alamgir (Persian: "Conqueror of the World"),[4] was the sixth Mughal emperor, who ruled over almost the entire Indian subcontinent for a period of 49 years.[5][6][7] Widely considered to be the last effective ruler of the Mughal Empire,[8] Aurangzeb compiled the Fatawa-e-Alamgiri, and was among the few monarchs to have fully established Sharia law and Islamic economics throughout the Indian subcontinent.[9][10] He was an accomplished military leader[11] whose rule has been the subject of praise, THOUGH he has also been described as the most controversial ruler in Indian history.[12]

I THINK MY ANSWER IS HELPFUL FOR YOU

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment