Which of the following is best to include under try block?(a) static values(b) const values(c) dynamic allocations(d) default valuesThis question was addressed to me during an interview.This is a very interesting question from Standard Exceptions topic in section Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++

Which of the following is best to include under try block?(a) static v

1.	Which of the following is best to include under try block?(a) static values(b) const values(c) dynamic allocations(d) default valuesThis question was addressed to me during an interview.This is a very interesting question from Standard Exceptions topic in section Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
Answer» The correct OPTION is (c) dynamic allocations To explain I WOULD say: Because the dynamic allocations can change at any TIME, So it is best to include in try block.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Where are standard exception classes grouped?(a) namespace std(b) error(c) catch(d) finalThe question was asked in my homework.Question is taken from Standard Exceptions topic in division Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What will happen if an exception that is thrown may cause a whole load of objects to go out of scope?(a) Terminate the program(b) Produce a runtime error(c) It will be added to the overhead(d) Compilation errorI had been asked this question by my school principal while I was bunking the class.I would like to ask this question from Exceptions and Efficiency topic in portion Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What will happen when we move to try block far away from catch block?(a) Reduces the amount of code in cache(b) Increases the amount of code in cache(c) Don’t alter anything(d) Increases the amount of codeThis question was posed to me by my school teacher while I was bunking the class.The above asked question is from Exceptions and Efficiency in chapter Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
How many parameters does the throw expression can have?(a) 1(b) 2(c) 3(d) 4The question was posed to me in semester exam.My question is based upon Catching Exceptions in division Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What is the syntax of inheritance of class?(a) class name(b) class name: access specifier(c) class name: access specifier class name(d) access specifier class nameI had been asked this question in a national level competition.The above asked question is from Design of Class Hierarchies in portion Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What operation can be performed by destructor?(a) Abort the program(b) Resource cleanup(c) Exit from the current block(d) Terminate the programI had been asked this question at a job interview.This question is from Exceptions and Efficiency topic in portion Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What do you mean by “No exception specification”?(a) It throws nothing(b) It can throw anything(c) It can catch anything(d) It can try anythingThe question was posed to me in a job interview.The origin of the question is Exception Specifications in portion Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
How many types of exception handling are there in c++?(a) 1(b) 2(c) 3(d) 4I got this question in my homework.The query is from Grouping of Exceptions in chapter Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
How many components STL has?(a) 1(b) 2(c) 3(d) 4I have been asked this question during a job interview.I want to ask this question from Standard Template Library in section Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++
What can be passed by non-type template parameters during compile time?(a) int(b) float(c) constant expression(d) stringI have been asked this question in exam.Query is from Function Templates topic in division Derived Classes, Templates & Exception Handling in C++ of C++

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment