Why Not Just Use System.out.println () For Unit Testing?

1.	Why Not Just Use System.out.println () For Unit Testing?
Answer» Debugging the code USING system.out.println() will lead to manual scanning of the whole OUTPUT every time the PROGRAM is run to ensure the code is doing the expected OPERATIONS. Moreover, in the long run, it takes lesser time to code Junit methods and test them on our files. Debugging the code using system.out.println() will lead to manual scanning of the whole output every time the program is run to ensure the code is doing the expected operations. Moreover, in the long run, it takes lesser time to code Junit methods and test them on our files.

Answer»

Debugging the code USING system.out.println() will lead to manual scanning of the whole OUTPUT every time the PROGRAM is run to ensure the code is doing the expected OPERATIONS. Moreover, in the long run, it takes lesser time to code Junit methods and test them on our files.

Debugging the code using system.out.println() will lead to manual scanning of the whole output every time the program is run to ensure the code is doing the expected operations. Moreover, in the long run, it takes lesser time to code Junit methods and test them on our files.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

What Happens If A Test Method Throws An Exception?
Do You Need To Write A Main () Method Compulsorily In A Junit Test Case Class?
How Do You Test A “private” Method?
How Do You Test A “protected” Method?
For Which Conditions, The Methods Get () And Set () Can Be Left Out For Testing?
The Methods Get () And Set () Should Be Tested For Which Conditions?
Why Not Just Use System.out.println () For Unit Testing?
What Happens If A Junit Test Method Is Declared To Return “string”?
What Happens If A Junit Test Method Is Declared As “private”?
What Is Junit Test Fixture?