

InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
1. |
Find out which part has an error and mark it as your answer. If there is no error, mark ‘No error’ as your answer.The Congress - ruled Rajasthan government had moving(A)/ the Supreme Court challenging validity of the CAA ,(B)/saying that the law was violative of fundamental rights like right to equality and life under constitution(C)/No error (D)1. A2. B3. C4. D |
Answer» Correct Answer - Option 1 : A<br><p>Correct option is option 1</p><p>The sentence is past perfect tense which indicates that an action was completed at some point in the past before something else happened.</p><p>Syntax of past perfect tense</p><table border="1" cellpadding="1" style="width:500px; border-spacing: 1px;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;"><strong>Person(singular/Plural)</strong></td><td style="text-align: center;"><strong>Auxiliary verb</strong></td><td style="text-align: center;"><strong>Verb</strong></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: center;">I/We</td><td style="text-align: center;">had </td><td style="text-align: center;">Verb will be in V3 form</td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: center;">You/You</td><td style="text-align: center;">had</td><td style="text-align: center;">Verb will be in V3 form</td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: center;">He, She, it /they, them</td><td style="text-align: center;">had</td><td style="text-align: center;">Verb will be in V3 form</td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Correct sentence - The Congress-ruled Rajasthan government had moved the Supreme Court challenging validity of the CAA, saying that the law was violative of fundamental rights like right to equality and life under constitution.</p> | |