How did clans (family groups) come into existence?

1.	How did clans (family groups) come into existence?
Answer» Right from 1000 BC, the Brahmins began to divide people into clans or classes. Each clan was given a name of a Vedacharya. Members of that clan were considered his followers. There were two important rules regarding the clans: 1. A woman leaves the clan of her father and accepts the clan of her husband. 2. Members of one clan, can’t marry members of the same clan. The Brahmin laws regarding the clans were not obeyed by all people. Rulers like the powerful Satavahanas, who ruled parts of Western India between 2^nd century BC and 2^nd century AD, did not follow the Brahmin laws. The wives of the Satavahana kings retained their fathers’ clan name. The clan names like ‘Gautama’, Vasishta’, etc. were of their fathers.

Answer»

Right from 1000 BC, the Brahmins began to divide people into clans or classes. Each clan was given a name of a Vedacharya. Members of that clan were considered his followers.

There were two important rules regarding the clans:

1. A woman leaves the clan of her father and accepts the clan of her husband.

2. Members of one clan, can’t marry members of the same clan.

The Brahmin laws regarding the clans were not obeyed by all people. Rulers like the powerful Satavahanas, who ruled parts of Western India between 2^nd century BC and 2^nd century AD, did not follow the Brahmin laws. The wives of the Satavahana kings retained their fathers’ clan name. The clan names like ‘Gautama’, Vasishta’, etc. were of their fathers.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

To enforce the Caste System the Brahmins used some strategies. Explain.
How did clans (family groups) come into existence?
In what ways was the Buddhist theory of a social contract different from the Brahmanical view of a society derived from the Purusha Sukta?(VBQ)
Compare and contrast the dharma or norms mentioned in the stories of Drona, Hidimba andMatanga.
Discuss whether kings in early states invariably were Kshatriyas.
Discuss whether the Mahabharata could have been the work of a single author.
This is what a famous historian of Indian literature, Maurice Wintemitz, wrote about the Mahabharata: “Just because the Mahabharata represents more of an entire literature…. and contains so many kinds of things….(it) give(s) us an insight into the most profound depths of the soul of the Indian folk.” Discuss.
Discuss the evidence tliat suggests that Brahmanical prescriptions about kinship and F marriage were not universally followed.
What does ‘Kulam” indicate?
What are the exceptions of the patriarchal system?