InterviewSolution
Saved Bookmarks
InterviewSolution
| 1. |
Solve : Breakthrough brings 'Star Trek' teleport a step closer? |
|
Answer» Less pollution Flying cars, next you will be reading the news paper about how someone came up and upended That would be so sweet to have a transporter.. No more driving...Is that a bad thing?Think of all those bus and TAXI drivers......Quote from: Carbon Dudeoxide on June 18, 2007, 09:34:49 PM Quote from: Beta Quadrant on June 17, 2007, 03:03:14 PMPoor Fat Driver...That would be so sweet to have a transporter.. No more driving...Is that a bad thing?Think of all those bus and taxi drivers...... But still, with all those jobs gone, there will be many more, such as teleportation mechanic, or teleportation supervisor etc. etc.Yeah but like (hundreds of) thousands of taxi and bus drivers here in Hong Kong. Not all of them can become a mechanic or supervisor....... And yes, poor fat driver. The picture attached below is one of our school bus drivers. Me and my friends call him Fat Driver because we don't know his name. He runs so many red lights [cleaning up - attachment deleted by admin]fat driver rules. Btw.. Teleportation won't work with humans the way they're trying to make it work. a good way to understand what i'm about to say is the Hugh Jackman movie ''The Prestige''. if you try to teleport people, you will need 3 points. A (the human to be teleported), B (The point the human will be teleported to), and C (the ''collision'' point i call it). Point A will start the process which will bring it on it's way of photon entanglement to point B, Point B having an object in it's spot already that's capable of creating human form, and point C will be sent at the same time. i call point C the collision point because it's the point that A collides (obviously) to give C the data it needs for the teleportation. C will take over from A after having the physiological data that it needs and will be sent to point B, Point A and the human sent with it DESTROYED during the information transfer. point C will arrive at point B with the information and ready for another transfer, which means during the transfer point C will also *die*, leaving only point B standing, as a perfect replica of point A... but not really... there will be no way to have all the mentalities and personality of point A (the original human) in point B. if point A had not been destroyed (this is possible to achieve, easier even), then there would be the origianal human and the teleported one. all teleportation is, is cloning basically, but the first human dies. yay! congratulations you just killed someone. the second human will be standing there wondering how he got there. you will go up to him and ask him if his memories are all fine and everything and he will say yes (if the possibility of having teleported memories is possible by then too). but he will only have a copy of the original human. he will only BE a copy, and he isn't the same person. EVERY single cell and molecule and action he ever does or has done is exactly the same as the original human, even his memories, but he's not the same. just a copy. if the original is kept alive during the teleportation then you will have to kill the copy after it's done it's little bit in the world, but, that copy is now also a human being. for these reasons alone, i am against teleportation. no matter how it's done, someone has to die. same with animals and non-living things. (teleportation has been acheived with an apple by the way, by australian scientists about 6 months ago. the original was destroyed and the replica tasted exactly the same. no decay.) apart from that it'd be fine, i think it would be really useful, but with a massive price TAG, and would probably also need to be used in conjunction with your pc. note that windows galactica probably won't support teleportation if you have less than 512 terabytes of RAM and/or did not install the 128 terabit version Testing 1,2,3 hello.test.... ignore this.... (feel free to delete it)Just testing this apparently broken post.Quote Or have (like in halo) a teleporter and a reciever so you can only go from one place to another. HMMMM....... A stargate!Hmmmm....... Don't get excited, I'm just playing.so is this topic still even alive even though it doesn't work?Its a nice little play ground. But you have to teleport in. Reaper, I am not reading all that, as insightful as it may be Quote from: 2k_dummy on June 25, 2007, 10:37:18 AM Its a nice little play ground. But you have to teleport in.Our predicament kinda suits this topic, doesn't it? Quote from: 2k_dummy on June 22, 2007, 05:30:04 AM QuoteIsn't that from StarCraft? Procross can teleport to those moving transporter things (don't know the name), you know.Or have (like in halo) a teleporter and a reciever so you can only go from one place to another. ~~Dark Blade: Legend of Time, Space, and BeyondQuote from: Dark Blade on June 27, 2007, 04:42:41 AM i was always under the impression that a stargate was from the show/movie stargate... could be wrong |
|