InterviewSolution
| 1. |
Solve : Computer-generated 'Sweetie' catches online predators? |
|
Answer» More than 100 Britons were among 1,000 men caught trying to pay a computer-generated child to perform sex acts online, after a Dutch children's charity set up a fake profile. I think it would not count as 'entrapment' if the perpetrator was instigating the illegal activity. Hence offering money to a minor for *censored* gratification. I don't think it matters which way around it HAPPENS. If a minor OFFERS *censored* opportunities, and the recipient of the offer ACCEPTS knowing that they are a minor, then that recipient is quite RIGHTLY treated as a criminal. Entrapment does matter when it comes to.. well entrapment. I agree that the scum need catching but entrapment is a very specific legal situation and so it should be. A 15yr old girl instigating *censored* activity is not entrapment however a government placing a 'young looking' person for entrapment can not be held in a court of law as you instigated the situation and there was no chance of a victim. Personally, I think this is a great thing they've managed to accomplish. I don't think this is really entrapment, because you're not forcing anyone to do anything, or even trying to get someone to do something they normally wouldn't, more just allowing them to make a decision they would have already made in a similar scenario. Good on the group that did this.In any types of sting operations the child never offers sex or anything like that, its always the pervs to do offer it. So its not entrapment, because the perv offers it, not the child. The perv try's controls the whole situation, and thus try's to take advantage of the child. |
|