1.

Solve : Registry backup util?

Answer»

Any recommendations?Nothing better, then ERUNT: http://www.larshederer.homepage.t-online.de/erunt/
It makes backup automatically every day. I use it on every machine, I have. Backs up more, then System Restore.Manual here: http://pcug.org.au/boesen/ERUNT/ERUNT.htmWhat a contrast...

Thanks for an actual recommendation Broni, I knew rather than a sarcastic suggestion to search for one, obviously in an attempt to amuse, I could rely on you to offer assistance (as always).

Then again, I feel bad now, maybe Google is the extent of Stevejohnson1958's knowledge?

Hey, we should all do that, no matter what anyones question is = Google.

What a FORUM that would be? Stevejohnson1958 would no doubt be the moderator

You see Stevejohnson1958 (no middle names?) how it works in this forum's community, is we suggest/offer ways in which to help people. I asked for a recommendation, hoping that it would be from someone who has actually experienced using that recommendation. Then, if I think that person is trustworthy enough, I will take their recommendation.

If I wanted to search for a program, I would use Google (sorry to break this to you Stevejohnson1958, but we ALL know what Google is for).

Thanks again Broni

No thanks Stevejohnson1958googlerecommendationspa tronisingI can see, you got really pissed off....hehehe

There are some serious advantages of ERUNT vs. System Restore.
Three of them are crucial:
- Using Erunt, you can restore your registry, even, if you can't boot to Windows
- automatic, daily backup
- System Restore doesn't include "hives", and ERUNT does

From ERUNT's help file:
http://www.larshederer.homepage.t-online.de/erunt/erunt.txt
Quote

In MS-DOS based Windows versions (95, 98, Me) the registry consists of
the files SYSTEM.DAT and USER.DAT (and CLASSES.DAT in Windows Me). To
backup these files, one can easily go to the Windows folder in
Explorer and copy the files to a safe location, for example another
folder on the hard disk. Microsoft even supplies a utility called ERU
which can be used to backup these and a few other critical system
files to a safe location.

Also, Windows 9x/Me automatically create backups of the registry at
startup, with Windows 95 always backing up the registry from the
previous Windows session, and Windows 98/Me maintaining up to five
registry copies from the last five days where Windows was running.

Unfortunately, this is not the case with Windows versions based on the
NT kernel. In Windows NT and 2000, the registry is never backed up
automatically, and in XP it is backed up only as part of the bloated
and resource hogging System Restore program which cannot even be used
for a "restore" should a corrupted registry prevent Windows from
booting. It has also become impossible to copy the necessary files,
now called "hives" and usually named DEFAULT, SAM, SECURITY, SOFTWARE,
SYSTEM in the SYSTEM32\CONFIG folder, to another location because they
are all in use by the OS.
And though the registry in an NT-based
Windows is less likely to become corrupted than in other versions, it
can still happen, and for these cases NT is simply missing an option
for easy registry backup and restore as there is in Windows 9x/Me, to
get the system up and running again in no time.

In 2001, as Windows XP began to come pre-installed on many new home
user PCs and was likely to become the new Windows STANDARD over the
next years, I decided to write a program which offers the ease-of-use
of Windows 9x/Me ERU by Microsoft (hence the name ERUNT) to backup the
registry, as well as providing an auto-backup capability, for example
at Windows startup.

Or, before installing a new program for testing purposes one could
save the registry with ERUNT, install and test the program, uninstall
it and restore the registry to be 100% sure that no debris is left.


Note: The "Export registry" function in Regedit is USELESS (!) for
making a complete backup of the registry. Neither does it export the
whole registry (for example, no information from the "SECURITY" hive
is saved), nor can the exported file be used later to replace the
current registry with the old one. Instead, if you re-import the file,
it is merged with the current registry without deleting anything that
has been added since the export, leaving you with an absolute mess of
old and new entries.
Quote
So why don't you just *** off!
This kind of LANGUAGE is not permitted around here. Use it at home!

Quote
It backs up your registry everytime it CREATES a Restore point.
You may want read my latest post about disadvantages of System Restore...
I'm suprised and dissapointed someone who has their own Forum would say what you did.
Hey guys

I feel I should just apologise to anyone who has/may read my previous comments directed towards this person & think it immature/inappropriate. I did think that I was being a little unecessarily rude at the time, but judging by their replies I'm now glad that I was. I don't care what this person thinks, I care about your opinion of me. Anyone who has come across me on this forum will hopefully say that I'm a friendly person who tries to help when they can & always show my utmost appreciation for any advice/support I am lucky enough to recieve (apart from 'google it'). Besides that, I have a lot of fun on here & I enjoy the company (even Broni's ).

I'm no computer wiz & I don't pretend to be, yes, I do know about system restore, but there are THOUSANDS of things that I don't know that others here do. No doubt there are things in life I know that others may not, but I wouldn't be patronising to them just to try & appear clever & think I am scoring points in front of an audience... I have more respect for myself.

Instead of having this (supposedly) vast amount of computer knowledge (like Google & Restore) & trying to belittle people, I would help them. If I didn't want to, I wouldn't go to a computer help forum just to project myself. Why would someone with knowledge visit a computer help forum & not help? I can only imagine it's because they want to look clever or they just want to annoy people. Perhaps it's to do with them having their own forum/ulterior motive (like advertising their site in their signature).

Even I know that 'advising' someone to 'google it' is just arrogant, I would never do that - that to me is completely disregarding the person as a total idiot, but in truth it is the total opposite.

Sorry about the autobiographyQuote from: stevejohnson1958 on March 02, 2008, 04:33:40 PM
Have you ever seen that video about Posting and You?

Kind of reminds me of this guy...LMAO!

Update: Posting and You

... and here's 'this guy':

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X1Ak2OrBKoNeljan and Stevejohnson1958 please act civilized on the forum. This is your warning message.

Locking post..

Calum - stevejohnson1958's messages removed at his request


Discussion

No Comment Found