'Some languages are difficult to learn, Sanskrit is a language, Theref

1.	'Some languages are difficult to learn, Sanskrit is a language, Therefore, Sanskrit is difficult to learn.’ This involves the fallacy of1. Undistributed middle term2. Composition3. Division4. None of the above
Answer» Correct Answer - Option 1 : Undistributed middle term The correct answer is Undistributed middle term. Undistributed middle term It is a logical fallacy. Also known as Maldistributed middle. In this fallacy, the middle term is not distributed in at least one of the arguments. Example: 'Some languages are difficult to learn, Sanskrit is a language, Therefore, Sanskrit is difficult to learn.’ In this example, the middle term language is undistributed since it is a predicate of both arguments. Composition It is the reverse of the Fallacy of Division. In this fallacy, what is true or correct about some parts of an object, then it is applied to whole parts of the object. Example: Because all of the components of this car are heavy, then the car itself must also be heavy. Division It is a reverse of the Fallacy of Composition. In this fallacy, what is true about whole parts of an object, then it is true for the parts of the whole. Example: The boys in my neighborhood like to play cricket. So my new neighbor, John, will like to play cricket with them.

'Some languages are difficult to learn, Sanskrit is a language, Therefore, Sanskrit is difficult to learn.’ This involves the fallacy of1. Undistributed middle term2. Composition3. Division4. None of the above

Answer» Correct Answer - Option 1 : Undistributed middle term

The correct answer is Undistributed middle term.

Undistributed middle term
- It is a logical fallacy.
- Also known as Maldistributed middle.
- In this fallacy, the middle term is not distributed in at least one of the arguments.
- Example: 'Some languages are difficult to learn, Sanskrit is a language, Therefore, Sanskrit is difficult to learn.’
  - In this example, the middle term language is undistributed since it is a predicate of both arguments.

Composition
- It is the reverse of the Fallacy of Division.
- In this fallacy, what is true or correct about some parts of an object, then it is applied to whole parts of the object.
- Example: Because all of the components of this car are heavy, then the car itself must also be heavy.
Division
- It is a reverse of the Fallacy of Composition.
- In this fallacy, what is true about whole parts of an object, then it is true for the parts of the whole.
- Example: The boys in my neighborhood like to play cricket. So my new neighbor, John, will like to play cricket with them.