Why Java is Partially OOP language?(a) It supports usual declaration of primitive data types(b) It doesn’t support all types of inheritance(c) It allows code to be written outside classes(d) It does not support pointersThe question was asked during an interview.The doubt is from OOPs Basic Concepts in portion OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming

Why Java is Partially OOP language?(a) It supports usual declaration o

1.	Why Java is Partially OOP language?(a) It supports usual declaration of primitive data types(b) It doesn’t support all types of inheritance(c) It allows code to be written outside classes(d) It does not support pointersThe question was asked during an interview.The doubt is from OOPs Basic Concepts in portion OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Answer» Right option is (a) It supports usual DECLARATION of primitive data types Easiest explanation - As JAVA supports usual declaration of data VARIABLES, it is partial implementation of OOP. Because ACCORDING to rules of OOP, object CONSTRUCTORS must be used, even for declaration of variables.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Which was the first purely object oriented programming language developed?(a) Java(b) C++(c) SmallTalk(d) KotlinI got this question in my homework.Question is taken from OOPs Basic Concepts topic in chapter OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Which of the following best defines a class?(a) Parent of an object(b) Instance of an object(c) Blueprint of an object(d) Scope of an objectThis question was addressed to me in an international level competition.The origin of the question is OOPs Basic Concepts topic in division OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
What is the additional feature in classes that was not in structures?(a) Data members(b) Member functions(c) Static data allowed(d) Public access specifierI have been asked this question during an interview for a job.My doubt is from OOPs Basic Concepts in division OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Who invented OOP?(a) Alan Kay(b) Andrea Ferro(c) Dennis Ritchie(d) Adele GoldbergThe question was asked by my college professor while I was bunking the class.This is a very interesting question from OOPs Basic Concepts in section OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Which is not feature of OOP in general definitions?(a) Code reusability(b) Modularity(c) Duplicate/Redundant data(d) Efficient CodeThe question was posed to me in semester exam.I need to ask this question from OOPs Basic Concepts in division OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Pure OOP can be implemented without using class in a program. (True or False)(a) True(b) FalseThe question was asked by my school teacher while I was bunking the class.My question comes from OOPs Basic Concepts topic in section OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
When OOP concept did first came into picture?(a) 1970’s(b) 1980’s(c) 1993(d) 1995I had been asked this question in my homework.This interesting question is from OOPs Basic Concepts topic in division OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Which Feature of OOP illustrated the code reusability?(a) Polymorphism(b) Abstraction(c) Encapsulation(d) InheritanceI got this question in an online quiz.This key question is from OOPs Basic Concepts in chapter OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
Which language does not support all 4 types of inheritance?(a) C++(b) Java(c) Kotlin(d) Small TalkThis question was addressed to me by my school principal while I was bunking the class.I want to ask this question from OOPs Basic Concepts in section OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming
How many classes can be defined in a single program?(a) Only 1(b) Only 100(c) Only 999(d) As many as you wantI had been asked this question in quiz.Question is taken from OOPs Basic Concepts topic in portion OOPs Concept & Features of Object Oriented Programming

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment