 
                 
                InterviewSolution
This section includes InterviewSolutions, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1851. | Solve : IOBit Steals Malwarebytes' Intellectual Property? | 
| Answer» Still makes no sense... In the database, like they added the fake virus, they should add another fake virus definition, except it should look for IOBit's code ibstead of a real virus. they already do that... | |
| 1852. | Solve : ComCast settles throttling lawsuit? | 
| Answer» Full Story You may be entitled to some cabbage...# at the bottom of the Article.Well, this says it all: Quote Whoever says the legal system in this country is broken, well, you're RIGHT. Comcast was caught tampering with its customers' packets two years ago. It bitched and moaned like nobody's business, earning itself no friends. The Federal COMMUNICATIONS Commission sanctioned the gigantic corporation in what amounted to a slap on the wrist. Big deal. A class action lawsuit was filed, which was just settled for $16 million. Comcast raked in $34.3 billion in revenue in 2008, meaning that this settlement amounts to four hours of revenue. That's right: four hours. Take that, corporate AMERICA!...and they're throttling again. This time, they got smarter. They don't target any specific program, or group of programs, they choke a whole bandwidth, whenever they want.I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit. That's not a high bandwidth service.Quote from: rthompson80819 on December 25, 2009, 12:06:36 PM I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit. That's not a high bandwidth service.Depends wheat you are sending. It is not just e-mail.Quote from: rthompson80819 on December 25, 2009, 12:06:36 PM I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit. That's not a high bandwidth service. It probably followed a pattern that made the service throttle it like it did P2P programs.When I did that post I didn't think it all the way through. When I was on Notes, 99% of what we sent and received was basic email and report updating. But that was just us. I can imagine companies like architect's sending big CAD attachments for comments and changes and using a lot of bandwidth.But how much money would each person receive from this lawsuit? It it even worth it?Because Lexmark payed a lot of money for falsely advertising how much each memory each of their flashdrives contained and besides the lawyers and the PEOPLE who originally sued ever other affected individual wast like given 50 cents, because they had to split the payment. | |
| 1853. | Solve : Accuweather availablity? | 
| Answer» Hi - It's working for me now.Now, for me too.Quote from: patio on December 26, 2009, 08:26:09 AM Weather Underground is my source of choice... Give it at least a looksee...NO......lolThanks for all who replied. Accuweather appears to be working all right now. Perhaps it was just something random and all is well now. It apparently fixed itself. Thanks BobYes, apparently they had a LITTLE downtime YESTERDAY. As I said, when I FIRST tried, it would not COME up. Later, it did. So, the problem was at their end.Probably bad Weather....Quote Probably bad Weather....LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL | |
| 1854. | Solve : UltraHD TV? | 
| Answer» http://hothardware.com/News/Got-HDTV-Get-Ready-For-UHDTV/ Quote provide four to 16 times the resolution of Blu-ray or 1080p high-def So amazing they can improve on the quality of blu-ray when it's ALREADY so GOOD. Just watched a interview from the blu-ray conference the other day and one of the directors was saying that blu-ray was it and how there is no way quality can be improved and I'm happy to report that the voice in the back of my head said I've heard that before ... Still that being said 16-times the resolution of blu-ray is more than I could imagine.I could see how a UHDTV would come in handy for something like a video wall or something like in Back to the FUTURE, where Marty pulls up 10 different channels to WATCH at once. At that point, each section of the screen could still be 1080p. I wouldn't mind having one big 55" screen with that kind of resolution in my office, instead of having 8 monitors. The heat that pour out of 8 monitors can be overwhelming at times (especially in the summer). One screen would be easier to manage too......Great.....Now I wanna watch Back To The Future..... | |
| 1855. | Solve : Bogus E-mails 'From' FDIC Link Computer Users To Viruses? | 
| Answer» HTTP://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091027162009.htm | |
| 1856. | Solve : Simple Machines 2.0 Released? | 
| Answer» Recieved this news this AM from my Inbox... | |
| 1857. | Solve : Snow Leopard Update Kills Atom-based Hackintoshes? | 
| Answer» Full Storygee, I wonder if geek-9pm will be as loud about this as Microsoft and Dr-Dos It's a CONSPIRACY...Hackintosh? What isQuote from: patio on November 10, 2009, 09:28:52 AM It's a conspiracy... Yes it is, nothing but a conspiracy designed to make US... Hang on, there's some guys in suits at the door.Quote from: Quantos on November 10, 2009, 05:14:43 PM Yes it is, nothing but a conspiracy designed to make us...Don't worry. They're just there to make sure you don't do ANYTHING you'll REGRET. | |
| 1858. | Solve : Google Set to Buy 4chan? Truth or Hoax? | 
| Answer» http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Business/Pages/Google-set-to-purchase-4chan-Scrape-TV-The-World-on-your-side.html If TRUE, a major scandal will ENSUE. Google's credibility will tank, and there will be a huge exodus at 4chan. If false, I will breath a sigh of relief and wipe the sweat off my brow. Google wouldn't get involved in it.Quote from: kpac on December 22, 2009, 03:35:11 PM Google wouldn't get involved in it.Just imagine how much this would tarnish their reputation. Why the heck would they want it ? ? This makes absolutely no SENSE at all. 10% of googles e-mail clients generate more traffic per minute than 4idjits generates in a month. Rubbish.I heard MICROSOFT is also poised to enter the paper clip industry. "Buy a box of 50 Clippy's and get the second box FREE!" Every box includes enough googly eyes to attach to all your paper clips. | |
| 1859. | Solve : What flip phone is a formidable replace for the iphone 3g?? | 
| Answer» Do you guys like the way stanza and the KINDLE app work on the iphone? Does it MAKE reading comfortable? | |
| 1860. | Solve : Firefox 3.5 Takes the Top Spot Worldwide? | 
| Answer» http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_35_takes_the_top_spot_worldwide.php Firefox hit a new milestone today, as version 3.5 overtook Internet Explorer 7.0 with nearly 22% of the browser market, according to statistics from web analytics service StatCounter. This comes on the heels of statistics we saw earlier this month, which showed Firefox overtaking IE for overall usage in Germany. While IE still dominates the browser market - with 55% of people using some version - all combined versions of Firefox occupy 32% and have been steadily GAINING ground. Released at the end of June, version 3.5 of Firefox has quickly climbed the charts. IE 8, on the other hand - which was first released in beta more than a year earlier, with a full release in March 2009 - now HOLDS a similar 20% of the market to that of Firefox 3.5's 22%. It would seem that a majority of Firefox 3.5 users were already using 3.0 and upgraded, as the 20% drop in 3.0 use almost DIRECTLY CORRELATES to the 22% increase in 3.5.OOHRAH! (Jarhead) I am very pleased that FF is finally taking over. On my local tv station some "security expert" said that using microsoft's AV and IE8 was the best way to stay safe online and I'm just like, "How much did Micro$soft PAY him to say that bull**** infront of a national audience?" | |
| 1861. | Solve : MS Anti-virus? | 
| Answer» Did you download 64-bit VERSION?Thanks, BRONI. I FOUND the 64 bit version on Filehippo.They have it at MS too. Next page after you CLICK download button.Here ya go. MSE 64 bit Download | |
| 1862. | Solve : Microsoft bans 1 million Xbox Live players? | 
| Answer» They COULD certainly do some vacuuming and dishes, called it 'Full Immersion Virtual Reality', some wirecutters would definetely insure that they aren't gaming EBay flooded with net-banned Xbox consolesQuote from: evilfantasy on November 14, 2009, 06:38:59 PM EBay flooded with net-banned Xbox consolesBuyer beware...Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity. If PEOPLE are.. I won't say naive but stupid enough to try and use pirated software on a network to the very people there stealing from then you deserve everything you get. I'm all for freedom of CHOICE but try not to CHOOSE to be a thick GOLDFISH. | |
| 1863. | Solve : 3.6 zettabytes!? | 
| Answer» My friend's shop across town has a platter from an old hard disk mounted on his wall from the early 1960s. It measures about 40" across and has a capacity of about 3.75MB or so. He told me the name of the computer it CAME from, but I don't recall at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised if in the next 10 years we go beyond petabytes and exabytes.And at the size of small coins. Quote from: Helpmeh on December 15, 2009, 04:56:40 AM And at the size of small coins. No doubt. Oh, I did finally FIND out what that platter he has is from. It came from a Bryant Computer 4240, c. 1961.Quote from: Helpmeh on December 15, 2009, 04:56:40 AM And at the size of small coins.And misspeaking of coins, please make no more references... to what comes after trillion. ...some Congressmen might read this! | |
| 1864. | Solve : AVG 9 released? | 
| Answer» Quote from: soybean on November 17, 2009, 10:45:47 AM "Any good up-to-date anti-virus will prevent you from opening a malicious worm or virus no matter how it arrived. Until and unless you click the attachment the virus or worm will not execute." Yep. A file in an email is just like a file on the Internet. Your antivirus is "watching" everything you click. I can't LINK to this quote but it's part of a discussion I'm in ATM. I'm also leaving out a few parts for VARIOUS reasons... Verifies what we have been saying. Quote When you open up any folders, AV programs will scan files in the folder even before you do anything with them. If you have lots of files and subfolders, and you open it up just to quickly look at SAY a small text file, you may have a very long delay before you can do anything in the Window due to the AV. AVs also can cause extremely long delay in getting the Add/Remove Programs form to populate. | |
| 1865. | Solve : Intel vs. AMD to end? | 
| Answer» In a landmark agreement this morning Intel and rival AMD have agreed to bury the hatchet in their long standing anti-trust litigation... AMD should just bow to Intel and let Intel overhaul and brand the AMD line. Everyone, end users and CEO's would benefit... Quote The two companies also forged a five-year cross-licensing agreement that gives the companies access to each other's key chip technology. "TODAY MARKS the BEGINNING of a new era," AMD Chief Executive Dirk Meyer said in remarks prepared for a conference CALL discussing the agreement. "It represents the culmination many years of litigation and regulatory engagement."Ahh. Thanks. Maybe Acer will begin to take hold of the market now. Nice LINK! I like AMD though but would always use intel in the office hehehe! thanks for sharing. | |
| 1866. | Solve : The Death of the PC? | 
| Answer» Well, not quite yet. But among corporate customers, the future is beginning to look very uncertain.  How is this different from Terminal Services?How is a skate board different from a mother cycle? never heard of a mother cycle...... But seriously, how's it different. Either way, you have to REMOTE into a different machine to access an operating system. I guess a better question is how is it better than Terminal Services? With terminal services, you have one os, one install of all supporting programs, one os to update. With virtual desktops, you still have to manage all of the licenses required for physical machines and you have to patch each one individually. michaewlewis, The more critical issue, IMO, is bandwidth. Right now, with the wimpy DSL connection I have, watching a movie online is not so good. But once most of use have optical connections, and the internet gets cleaned up, we can have real "cloud computing". That will be way beyond terminal services. In the future, IMO, we could rent our software like we rent videos. The cost would be like a long distance cell phone call. You might pay ten cents a minute to play a powerful, interactive first person adventure game with stunning graphical effects beyond even the best effects in current Sci-Fi flicks. By then, we will put our PCs into the Local Museum, ... - Next to the old 45 RPM vinyl collection. no seriously- this is just Sun's idea of a "net-PC" revisited, which was itself a revisitation of the whole "time-shared" computing system, where terminals were just- well, terminals, and the actual processing occured on a mini-computer. VAX-VMS, for example.One big impact of this move, no playing solitaire at work. A lot of business, even small ones, already have optical connections with the total speed governed by what they are willing to pay for. Optical connections to the home are another matter. There are a few thousand out there now but it is still in an experimental mode and not cost effective.Quote from: rthompson80819 on December 12, 2009, 01:38:57 PM One big impact of this move, no playing solitaire at work.100 feet of good optical cable is less that the cost of a wireless router. And a whole lot more bandwidth than anything else.Quote 100 feet of good optical cable is less that the cost of a wireless router. And a whole lot more bandwidth than anything else. True, but what are you going to connect that 100' of fiber to? That's where the real cost comes in. Quote from: Geek-9pm on December 11, 2009, 06:54:39 PM michaewlewis, Still sounds like terminal services. Or at least Microsoft's latest implementation of it. In Server 2008, you can lauch a single app WITHOUT launching an entire desktop via mstsc. It's pretty cool, I use it frequently at work. And of course files are always stored on a server..... so I don't see how that's so different from using "The Cloud". Obviously the internals are different, but the usability is pretty close to the same. | |
| 1867. | Solve : Windows 7 student upgrade *censored*? | 
| Answer» http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/10/24/windows-7-student-upgrade-*censored*/OMG!Old news...and MS was very quick to address the issue. They provided an alternate link to a closed MS SITE to DLoad a FRESH .ISO... This took place 2 days after the issue was FIRST reported. | |
| 1868. | Solve : Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad? | 
| Answer» It happened to me yesterday.... http://www.dslreport...Gone-Mad-105773 Antivirus program suddenly sees false positives everywhere... While it veers astray from our normal SUBJECT matter of broadband-related news, users in our security forum are indicating that Avast antivirus appears to have gone seriously off of the rails. According to users, the application has suddenly decided to flag many safe applications, freshly-downloaded files and dlls as malicious, wreaking havoc on user systems. It appears that the program is flagging a number of files used by entirely normal programs such as Skype, Spybot Search and Destroy and other programs incorrectly as the Win32:Delf-MZG trojan. Avast's official forums are currently being crushed by the sudden onslaught of traffic created by confused users, many of whom are being told that generic program files are a security threat. Impacted users should uninstall the program or disable the file shield functionality of the application until a fix is issued, lest they delete necessary files on the advice of an anti-virus program gone mad. Avast, which just celebrated the addition of its 100,000,000th user, is in for a very busy night. Needless to say, your copy of Microsoft Paint is not a virus, regardless of what Avast is currently telling you. Update Avast has posted a statement to their forum saying they've fixed the problem. A little off topic, but what's "C:\Program Files (x86)\..."? Is it something like 64...oh wait, I don't know what that is either. x86 are 32-bit files/programs on 64-bit system.I have YET to find any relative issues with avast on either an XP or Vista system yet. This may not be WIDESPREAD and may be indicative of other issues.No other issues. If you just Google it, the problem was widespread. It was fixed same day with next Avast update. I was affected myself, as Avast flagged one of my legit and healthy folders.Ah, there we have it then, obviosly my 12 HOUR days are interfering with my computer use. Because of botched update timing, the most affected AREAS were Pacific and Asia time zones.Quote from: Broni on December 05, 2009, 04:33:15 PM Because of botched update timing, the most affected areas were Pacific and Asia time zones. That makes sense then, I wouldn't have been on my system during that time frame at all.One of our members got that virus. Too late, all .exe files deleted. Topic: trojan detected Win32:Delf-MZG in AVAST proJust to clarify here all his .exe's were NOT deleted by Avast....they are gone because he didn't follow instructions from the Virus and Spyware section of the Forum...What really makes me mad is people on the chat are "helping" people who have this "virus" and saying the scan is right and these files are infected, AND THEN not listening when people shove proof in their faces that they're wrong. Quote from: Helpmeh on December 03, 2009, 08:06:29 PM A little off topic, but what's "C:\Program Files (x86)\..."? Is it something like 64...oh wait, I don't know what that is either.Quote from: Broni on December 03, 2009, 08:09:43 PM x86 are 32-bit files/programs on 64-bit system. More info here Quote from: Helpmeh on December 07, 2009, 01:23:10 PM What really makes me mad is people on the chat are "helping" people who have this "virus" and saying the scan is right and these files are infected, AND THEN not listening when people shove proof in their faces that they're wrong. I'm not surprised at all.Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 07, 2009, 03:15:36 PM More info hereThanksQuote What really makes me mad is people on the chat are "helping" people who have this "virus" and saying the scan is right and these files are infected, AND THEN not listening when people shove proof in their faces that they're wrong. Quote It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.I never claim to know what I don't know. (is that a sentence?) If there is any doubt what-so-ever, I send them to see EF. I've probably sent some his way that don't need him, but better safe than sorry, right? | |
| 1869. | Solve : ATI Radeon HD 5970 Dual-GPU Powerhouse Review? | 
| Answer» AMD's "SWEET SPOT" GPU strategy over the last few years has been fairly predictable. Instead of producing the biggest, most powerful GPU possible--yields be damned--the company SETS out to produce a relatively high-end GPU, using a cutting edge fabrication process, that HITS a proverbial sweet spot between cost and performance. Then derivatives, and even multiples, of that GPU are used to flesh out a top-to-bottom line-up of graphics cards, that hit a broad range of PRICE points. Quote ... Bet this would handle [emailprotected] well. Link | |
| 1870. | Solve : No. 10 1983 This Day in History? | 
| Answer» The first known PC virus was created and launched... | |
| 1871. | Solve : Microsoft admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy? | 
| Answer» This just in from the news DESK.... | |
| 1872. | Solve : Toshiba does it again.? | 
| Answer» Toshiba got it right this time. What a laptop. Fair enough Horrible tech support? I've never encountered a problem with the support, other than the low level guys have thick accents. I usually request a call back from a supervisor. I've never WAITED more than an hour for one of those. The lowlevel guys drive me NUTS though.Quote The lowlevel guys drive me nuts though. I resemble that...I've never ever used a diagnostic program of any form. IF chkdsk /r finds bad sectors- or notes that some sectors take a long time to return data- then I know there's a problem. Otherwise everything is chip.Quote Otherwise everything is chip.Chip??.....LOL Quote IF chkdsk /r finds bad sectors- or notes that some sectors take a long time to return data- then I know there's a problem.I have to disagree here. I saw CASES, when chkdsk came up OK, but manufacturer diagnostic program found ISSUES. | |
| 1873. | Solve : micrsoft's new page easier to use? | 
| Answer» http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx what do you thinkNice. I see it's focused on Windows 7. it might be but the links etc are much easier to use and findYes, I like that top menu bar. SEEMS very well organized. Their web content is so vast that I can't imagine having to decide how it should be arranged for easy ACCESS by visitors.Yes, I like that top menu bar. Seems very well organized. this is what i mean INSTEAD of searching through loads of PAGES | |
| 1874. | Solve : NSA Is Giving Microsoft Some Help On Windows 7 Security? | 
| Answer» The National Security Agency has been working with Microsoft Corp. to help improve security measures for its new Windows 7 operating system, a senior NSA OFFICIAL said on Tuesday. The confirmation of the NSA's role, which began during the development of the software, is a sign of the agency's deepening involvement with the private sector when it comes to building defenses against cyberattacks. Link Interesting. I'm glad to know COMPUTER security is getting this kind of attention and support from government agencies.Now if things get bad at MS we will be bailing them out. Times are tough, but NASA NEVER seems to be effected. Sorry... /rant Of course I have a hunch that the 'help' the NSA is giving them will only MAKE it easier for the NSA to access our data. Hang on a minute, some GUYS in suits are at my door.Yea and I misread NSA as NASA. I should wake up before ranting. | |
| 1875. | Solve : Avira switches to new update system? | 
| Answer» http://techblog.avira.com/2009/11/19/avira-switches-to-new-update-system/en/ Due to the fast growing amount of malware out there in the wild our virus definition files grow fast as well. We monitored the situation with our Updates very closely. We realise that users of the free Avira AntiVir Personal had issues fetching the Updates in time recently and did come up with a few ideas how we could solve the problem and to better satisfy the needs of our users. Two of the results are getting realized today: First, we switch from our current virus definition files (called iVDF) to a new FORMAT called nVDF. iVDF consists of 4 VDF files, while nVDF uses at least 32 files – we need to TRANSFER less data for updating our virus definitions effectively in the future. This means that we need to deliver about 25 MByte to every Avira installation starting today for switching to the new update system. This might lead to some DELAYS for some users, especially for the users of our free version Avira AntiVir Personal. Just to get an idea about what we’re talking here: More than 100.000.000 Users are trying to get the update more or less on the same day. That is more than 2.5 Petabytes (or 2,500 Terabytes) of traffic. To ease the bandwidth bottleneck, we decided to additionally use a Content Delivery Network (CDN). We were first testing a CDN built up by our current Internet service provider. Shortly after activating the CDN, the redirectors – which redirect the update requests to servers close to the users LOCATION – were overloaded and couldn’t answer the requests anymore. The situation was solved a little later on, but the CDN isn’t big enough yet to SPREAD this huge update in time. So we decided to switch to a global player in the CDN market to deliver the update. We hope that the data is transfered much faster this way so also the users of free Avira AntiVir Personal can enjoy their security solution without any problems: After this Update the situation will get much better for the users of Avira AntiVir Personal. N.B.: Users of commercial Avira products like Avira AntiVir Premium, Avira Premium Security Suite or Avira AntiVir Professional don’t face any of these problems as they access our servers with reserved bandwidth. | |
| 1876. | Solve : Google OS: the end of the hard drive?? | 
| Answer» Hmmmm. I don't like keeping my head in the cloud\s, I'll stay with a local based OS and storage. Can't say for others, if it's "their thing" that's fine, just as long as I have the option to not have to use the cloud. It's bad enough keeping info private as possible and I don't care if they send me a written guarantee signed by Google itself that my info will be "safe", I'm not buying it. Anyone who looks back knows, no matter how secure the claim, someone will break that security. If companies and everyone do stray to cloud based OS's, kiss net admin and many pc repair jobs goodbye as well. Quote Chrome OS netbooks will not have traditional hard disk drives -- they will rely on non-volatile flash memory and Internet-based storage for saving all of your data. This may be progress... but dangerous progress! If you store your data on the web, what if the Google database gets compromised? There goes all your precious data. It's aimed towards college students, so all their files and work can be stolen in a matter of days. What if you don't have internet? Quote All the applications will be web-based, meaning users won't have to install apps, manage updates or even backup their data. All data will be stored in the cloud, and users won't even have to bother with anti-virus software: Google claims it will monitor code to prevent malicious activity in Chrome OS web apps. That is a step way to far. So say you have a Video Game, your saved games are saved on the internet? Personally, "Clouds" are a bit to far for me to call a safe zone.Quote kiss net admin and many pc repair jobs goodbye as well. Why exactly would this take place ? ? PC's still have to physically run... Net Admin positions would if anything be in larger demand... I don't get it.Quote from: Blendman on NOVEMBER 22, 2009, 09:48:41 AM Hmmmm. I don't like keeping my head in the cloud\s, ... ... kiss net admin and many pc repair jobs goodbye as well. I think your head is in the clouds...More relevant than ever..... http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/article675014.eceI touched on this before. Sun Microsystem already tried this, they called them "net PCs" they needed to be connected to broadband to even boot up. It was simply awful. Some said they were ahead of their time. I say the Dumb Terminal->Time shared server system, whatever the architecture (web or Local area network) was put out of use for a reason, and it wasn't because the "technology had to mature" it was because the concept had security and architectural flaws that were both inherent in the very concepts themselves, namely the "time-sharing" concept. VAX-VMS users were able to "force" the VMS to give them either larger time-slices then other users or even take it over themselves, simply with a few clever commands and some compiled BASIC. If google wishes to go through with this AGAIN but using the slower and less robust Web as a conduit for this data then they better be ready to actually implement some form of cross-dumb-terminal security. Really Google is too excited about this. What does it bring to the table? People will have access to their data anywhere? How is this relevant? If somebody wants ot take their data with them- thaey take it WITH them. If you have access to your own data anywhere, so will anybody else who knows about it, so it stands to reason that all this is doing is increasing the data theft attack surfaces. It also does something else that has seemingly been forgotten, but I believe it might have been one of the concepts Quantos was describing; the fact that this makes google not only the one in charge of the storage of our data, but it also makes them the exclusive owner. Remember the EULA for chrome? Do you really think they did that "by accident"? that forum posts and the like posted from within Chrome would become their intellectual property... "oh sorry, don't know how that got in there" Google doesn't just want control of our data, they want it. If they can get people in colleges and so forth to use this technology then they have absolute control over the flow of education and research data that they couldn't acquire via other means. I'm sure their lawyers are hard at work looking for a way to phrase their EUL so it doesn't seem as threatening but has the same effect. if Microsoft was doing this there would already be theories abound about the "real reason" and yet when it comes to google, people actually trust them. I don't trust ANY corporation because at no point are they doing it for "public interest", they are ALWAYS out to do something for themselves- what appears to be a "good deed" may in fact be a PUBLICITY stunt, and in cases such as this one where there is a potential for people to simply "hand-over" their hard work to a corporation that has already made compromisory EULA agreements that IMO were even worse then those put forth by MS, which people hold as a "shining example" of EULA's designed to limit people's rights. Quote Why exactly would this take place ? ? For one, a majority of PC repair, statistic wise has to do with software, operating systems, infections, etc... if most of this becomes based on a server somewhere, what is there for you or I to fix? Second, don't you feel that if Google put out hardware that was only compatible with their "cloud" method, that most would simply have to send it in or get a replacement? I doubt it would be like working on a standard PC at the moment. Just what could net admins control? What would there be to control? Internet access? The servers could be set up for specific company needs if stored all in a cloud, they would have the machines to access that cloud only, or just that authority no? I can't see where an network admin would be needed. The only issue would be with connections from time to time, going back to the specific hardware from Google, I think they would also have specific people to DEAL with that too or like stated above, simply replace it. Just like cell phones, a DIME a dozen but people actually pay for the service. How many actually repair a cell phone? Quote I think your head is in the clouds... Nice and intelligent comeback to my opinion. Remind me to play chess with you some day, I love to win in 3 moves or less. I still don't get it...sorry. Hardware still has to function...so your "majority idea" of PC repair is flawed... 2nd Net Admins run and keep networks going so it doesn't matter if they are doing traditional computing or cloud computing...the network still has to be maintained for either to happen... 3rd your assertion of google hardware is just too ridiculous to comment on...even though i just did.Quote from: Blendman on November 22, 2009, 04:23:06 PM Remind me to play chess with you some day, I love to win in 3 moves or less. Hey and he's funny too...Quote Google is currently working with unnamed computer manufacturers to define specifications for these computers, which Pichai said will include larger netbook-style computers with full-size keyboards, large trackpads and large displays.Quote 3rd your assertion of google hardware is just too ridiculous to comment on...even though i just did. My assertion, I like that. Does the above sound like my assertion? Let's recap another part of this yet again... Quote so you can stop worrying about your computer Sorry, not my assertion, it's Google's. Quote Hardware still has to function...so your "majority idea" of PC repair is flawed... Er... not "my idea", it was a statistic for many reasons why software is the no.1 issue that techs repair for people. I doubt Google will make these specific machines for us to tinker with, at least not right away. And besides, without the hard drive, software, would you base your living off what's left to repair? I wouldn't. Quote 2nd Net Admins run and keep networks going so it doesn't matter if they are doing traditional computing or cloud computing...the network still has to be maintained for either to happen... Not if the server "say Google based" is set up for a business where users have to log in and only to a specific account, it would be Google based if anything other than a physical mishap occurred with wiring or wireless, security isn't going to be user based, the server isn't, software isn't so what's left for the admin? Even then, if Google is having specific machines made, likely they will come with some type of service as well, knocking out the basic repair guy. Google won't want anyone to tinker with their equipment, guaranteed. So what's left besides the physical internet connection? That would be like hiring and admin to watch over a room full of people texting on their phones. Lastly, if you actually read the above, it's not my opinion, it's a fact this is what Google is striving for. Microsoft threw rumors in the air some years ago about the same thing and if Google succeeds, this could very well put others in the green light to do the same. So regardless, it's gearing toward "one day" putting techs out, keeping users from mucking up systems while large corporations hold our info. Maybe not 10 years from now but eventually. Quote What about "DOS addresses only 1 Megabyte of RAM because we cannot imagine any applications needing more." - is it sourced?the debate is academic anyway. I highly doubt Google enjoys repeating failure, but that is what they might be walking into. The whole idea here should be to solve a problem; this web-based OS architecture is a solution looking for a non-trivial problem. With the VAX-VMS for example, and other time-shared computer architectures (not quite what google is going for, but the concepts are pretty similar in many respects) the reason they did it, was simply because the computer itself was so large and expensive; they couldn't hope to have more then one, and certainly not an entire laboratory. The very idea of a "personal" computer should be to emphasize the "personal" idea; in that respect the google OS will not be a "personal" computer operating system, since data is not stored on a personally owned hard drive, but rather on a hard drive on some server somewhere. The question here is What exactly does this achieve? Now all disk access to that data is slower. The main thing they vouch is that it will be accessible "anywhere"; but I think they need to re-examine just how trivial it is to copy files that are necessary onto a flash drive, or the large number of ways that this can be done within other operating systems; synchronization between a local and a ftp folder, for example. did I mention that people "personal" data will be stored on hard drives owned by google? because personally I find that a bit disconcerting. Another important thing is wether even google could create the appropriate architecture, and how long will they? People say that MS is controlling the hardware market; but really unless you want the latest Windows OS you have no need for updated hardware; old computers still run windows 98 fine, for example. But if google succeeds in launching this platform and it becomes popular, google can make partnerships with hardware vendors and even force users to have certain hardware in order to run, or use certain features. Google already provides advertised links that may or may not be either relevant or safe, so it's no big revelation to realize that they are in fact a company and the bottom-line is really the very reason they do anything. But what exactly does releasing this OS do for their bottom line? They will need to purchase servers and a very powerful back-end for all this data that people store; I would hope they would have backups of that as well in case of failures, not to mention 24/7 monitoring staff. This is expensive. They wouldn't be doing this if they didn't think they could profit in the long run. And sure, it sounds kind of like a conspiracy theory; but I think what Google is really after is the data itself; the ability to mine personal data and provide the very same "google experience", like "personalized" advertisements; and even the automatic subscription to services, masked under the thin veil of some sort of silly google trademark. They already mine data from peoples browsing habits via Google AdSense; by strengthening both the scope of the display of advertisements as well as the amount of data to mine (that is, browser that may be even set up to block google adsense to a entire OS developed solely for the purpose of said data mining) it would vastly improve their abilities to mass-market other companies products to the proper demographics and to people interesting in such products. This means they could boost the pricing of said contracts. Is this what they are doing? I have no idea; it's just a theory. But given what I've seen of Google, especially with regards to Chrome's early EULA's, it would seem that this has been their goal for some time. Quote from: BC_Programmer on November 22, 2009, 05:49:09 PM did I mention that people "personal" data will be stored on hard drives owned by google? because personally I find that a bit disconcerting.I was thinking about that too. | |
| 1877. | Solve : manufacturer of your laptop?? | 
| Answer» 1 in 3 laptops die in first three years Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:31PM EST So your new laptop computer died in inside of a year. "I'll never buy a computer from [INSERT manufacturer name here] again!" I've heard the protests time and time again. Yeah, maybe you got a lemon, but no matter which brand you bought, you truly are not alone in this situation: An analysis of 30,000 new laptops from SquareTrade, which provides aftermarket warranty coverage for electronics products, has found that in the first three years of OWNERSHIP, nearly a third of laptops (31 percent) will fail. That's actually better than I would have expected based on my experience and observations on how people treat their equipment. SquareTrade has more detailed information (the full PDF of the company's study is available here) on the research on its website. But here are some highlights about how, why, and which laptops fail: > 20.4 percent of failures are due to hardware malfunctions. 10.6 percent are due to drops, spills, or other accidental damage. > Netbooks have a roughly 20 percent higher failure rate due to hardware malfunctions than standard laptops. The more you pay for your laptop, the less likely it is to fail in general (maybe because you're more careful with it?). > The most reliable companies? A shocker: Toshiba and Asus, both with below a 16 percent failure rate due to hardware malfunction. > The least reliable brands? Acer, GATEWAY, and HP. HP's hardware malfunction rate, the worst in SquareTrade's analysis, is a whopping 25.6 percent. None of the numbers are overly surprising. As SquareTrade notes, "the typical laptop endures more use and abuse than nearly any other consumer electronic device (with the possible exception of CELL phones)," so failures are really inevitable. Want to keep your notebook running for longer than a few years? Ensure your laptop is as drop-proofed as possible (use a padded bag or case, route cords so they won't be tripped on, lock children in another room), and protect it as best you can from heat and dust. source: 1 in 3 laptops die in first three yearsThis isn't really news to me, but thanks for posting it. I knew there was a reason I pay top dollar for Toshiba and have never had an issue.I think some people are just lacadaisical in their handling of a laptop. Apparently, they assume it's built to withstand rather rough handling and, therefore, they act accordingly. If they would heed this advise ... Quote Want to keep your notebook running for longer than a few years? Ensure your laptop is as drop-proofed as possible (use a padded bag or case, route cords so they won't be tripped on, lock children in another room), and protect it as best you can from heat and dust.... the failure rate would be much lower. I have a Compaq that I bought in July 2007. I don't carry it around much but I have very little doubt I'll surpass the 3 year mark with no problem. And, I paid bottom dollar. Quote from: geek hoodlum on November 23, 2009, 07:12:41 PM 1 in 3 laptops die in first three years What percentage of the 20.4% is caused by the user? Quote from: geek hoodlum on November 23, 2009, 07:12:41 PM 1 in 3 laptops die in first three years Keep in mind this is only out of the 30,000 laptop they offer coverage for so considering that many more then that are manufactured and sold each year this is a very small AMOUNT. I wonder why Dell isn't in there any where? | |
| 1878. | Solve : Soon, music industry will beg you to illegaly download MORE copyrighted music :)? | 
| Answer» Illegal downloads drive online music sales http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/broadband/illegal-downloads-drive-online-music-sales-645935 New survey suggests downloaders end up spending more in the end After years of bluster and misguided policy from government and the music industry alike, a change in the attitude to file-sharing may be on the horizon THANKS to a new survey that shows illegal downloaders actually spend more on music then their straight-as-a-die counterparts. The Demos poll of 1,000 people between 16 and 50 found that illegal downloaders on average spend £77 a year on music, whereas the rest fork out just £44. Discovery mechanism Analyst Mark Mulligan of Forrester Research took the OPPORTUNITY to highlight a truth policy makers seem unable or unwilling to grasp: "The people who file-share are the ONES who are interested in music. They use file-sharing as a discovery mechanism." WHETHER or not the Demos findings will have any impact on PETER Mandelson's plans to introduce a US style 'three strikes and you're out' approach to discouraging illegal downloading remains to be seen. Well, hopefully. But I do not spend any money on music. 0$$ | |
| 1879. | Solve : ChromeOS and Android to merge?? | 
| Answer» Check out this article.No secret to me that one of Googles aims is to become one of the largest cell phone providers in the WORLD...i believe this is actually what CHROME is about.Would it be called 'Chromaroid'?RoidChrome...i believe.I'd better stock up on the 'Preparation Chrome'. | |
| 1880. | Solve : Dumb code could stop computer viruses in their tracks? | 
| Answer» http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427355.600-dumb-code-could-stop-computer-viruses-in-their-tracks.htmlSomebody made that up. There isn't a chance in h-e DOUBLE hockey sticks that it could work. Quote If the file is simply opened by another program, the code is ignored. err- no, actually, it causes a corrupt or unreadable file message. you know, because it get's some random machine code instead of the header for it's file type. Additionally, they don't discuss what happens when the file passes through multiple servers. Does each one staple on this "machine code" (which is not even sophisticated- I mean seriously- a single RET instruction, and they simply assume that EVERY program ever made will ignore the First byte being Hex CB? Not the case. Word 2007, for example, using it's native docx format, refuses to open the file, saying it's corrupt. It will open the file, but only when asked to "recover" the contents. I suppose they are assuming that every program has a recovery function of this sort? Ahh! but it get's BETTER! try it with a Word 2003 or earlier Document! what fun! it thinks it's a text file, and asks what the encoding is. Additionally, if they do this with an executable, I'm not sure how that would work. they would need to detect a number of different Executable types, since only COM files are simply headerless executable code; and what about Script files? how does it work with those? This sounds like one of those software companies who have one developer for every 50 marketing salespeople. All this will do from what they say is make your attachments unreadable. (ahh, but not just unreadable: "unreadable®". after all- they DID patent it. I'm with BC_programmer on this one, couldn't see how this would work. I also didn't like the below quote, when is an infinite loop ever good for a computer? Personally I think a TACTIC like this would seem to cause more problems then it'd actually solve, ESPECIALLY with valid files. But I'd love to be proven wrong. Quote Qinetiq's code will run first - and stop the rest of the program in its tracks, either by exiting or by sending it into an infinite loop. | |
| 1881. | Solve : Another one - IE bug leaks private details from 50m PDF files? | 
| Answer» http://www.theregist...disclosure_bug/ A bug in MICROSOFT's Internet Explorer browser is causing more than 50 million files stored online to leak potentially sensitive information that could compromise user privacy, a security researcher said. The documents stored in Adobe's PDF format display the internal disk location where the file is stored, an oversight that can inadvertently expose real-world names and login IDs of users, the operating system being used and other information that is better kept private. The data can then be retrieved using simple web searches Google searches such as this one expose almost four million documents residing on users' C drives alone. Combined with searches for other common drives, the technique exposes more than 50 million files that display the local disk path, according to Inferno, a security researcher for a large software company who asked that his real name not be used. "If they have those kind of PDFs, somebody can use search engines to find out user names or do more reconnaissance on the operating systems used," he told The Register. "That actually INVADES the privacy of a user." The potentially sensitive data is included in PDFs that have been printed using Internet Explorer. The full path location is appended to its contents as soon as the Microsoft browser is used to print the document. Although the data isn't always exposed when the document is viewed with Adobe Reader, it is easily readable when the file is opened in editors such as Notepad, and the text is also available to Google and other search engines. This PDF, for example, was stored at C:\Program Files\Wids7\WizardReport.htm at TIME of printing. The path makes it clear that the file was stored on a Windows MACHINE that has software from Worldwide Instructional Design System installed. Other PDFs give up directory names that reveal authors, projects or other data that may have been designated confidential. The only WAY to remove the path is erase the text in an editor and save the document. All versions of IE suffer from the bug. A Microsoft spokeswoman said company engineers are working to reproduce the reported behavior. "We can confirm that this is not a vulnerability," she wrote in an email. Adobe representatives didn't reply to requests for comment. Inferno's report is here. MS should just resign from the Browser market...I'm a little confused. When you open a PDF in IE it rights to the file what the directory is in and then you can read that and learn things about the host computer? Quote it is easily readable when the file is opened in editors such as Notepad, and the text is also available to Google and other search engines. That means at some time the directory is written to the PDF. Right? that sounds more like a problem with adobe to me. What am I missing? Is it saying that opening a PDF is dangerous, or hosting a PDF file online allows people access to the directory info?Quote MS should just resign from the Browser market...Now, you're talking Boozu Quote That means at some time the directory is written to the PDF. Right? that sounds more like a problem with adobe to me.Not really. That data is shown only, if: Quote The potentially sensitive data is included in PDFs that have been printed using Internet Explorer.Broni. OK but you said that the directory could be read if you opened it in something like note pad. What did you mean if it is not written to the PDF. Is this a threat to the person using IE or the PDF host?OK, this is how I read it. If you created PDF file and you uploaded it to some on-line storage, using IE, then some of your sensitive data can be exposed ("that can inadvertently expose real-world names and login IDs of users, the operating system being used and other information that is better kept private. The data can then be retrieved using simple web searches").This is not a BUG in IE. It is a problem with the whole concept involved with HOOKING a printer into something else- such as a driver that "prints" to a PDF file. The fact that IE prints the source file is not a problem with IE, since as far as IE is concerned it is printing to paper; not something that would be necessarily insecure. The problem is with the architecture used to make these PDF files; IE does have a Extensibility interface that would be far more useful in this respect; creating a psuedo-printer to create PDF files is bound to cause a problem down the line since all programs using it will, for all intents and purposes, believe they are printing to paper.Broni. That is very interesting. BC. I like to hear that. Does this mean that it happens with other browsers too?To make a PDF file, a virtual printer is installed. doPDF is an example but all use the same idea. To use it, just browse to a page, go to print and select the doPDF printer. This will then create a PDF of the webpage you were looking at. That's basically how it works.It is more that a bug. It is a major security flaw. The original source is The Register. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/23/internet_explorer_file_disclosure_bug/ http://www.internet-security.ca/internet-security-news-024/internet-explorer-security-hole-leaks-private-information-from-pdf-files.html http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2009/Nov/1023233.html http://www.securitynewsportal.com/securityblogs/article.php?title=Millions_Of_PDF_Files_Leak_Private_Data_Due_To_Internet_Explorer_Bug Netscape anyone? | |
| 1882. | Solve : Google Search Results for Your Name Reveal Your Facebook Friends Even If Your Fa? | 
| Answer» Now this is new! If you have a Facebook account, searching for your name in Google will TURN up not only a link to your Facebook page, but includes a LIST of your friends, as well! And that’s even if your privacy settings on Facebook are set to disallow public access, such as the “only My Networks and Friends can see my profile and personal info” settings. | |
| 1883. | Solve : Turn a cheap webcam into a 3D scanner? | 
| Answer» Full Story Fascinating...Wow that is really fascinating and something that could prove to be really helpful. I know I'd much rather create a 3D model using this technique then trying to do it in 3ds Max. Just think of the possible applications this would have. Not only for models and enthusiasts, but for insurance purposes and inventory. On the downside anybody RECEIVING VIDEO data from a webcam could model you.That is simply amazing. My HAT is off to the folks at CAMBRIDGE. | |
| 1884. | Solve : LCD Motion Blur: Fact and Fiction? | 
| Answer» http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2356393,00.asp Quote Findings Highlights | |
| 1885. | Solve : Black Screen of Death after recent Microsoft updates? | 
| Answer» If any of you experienced, as I did, the Black Screen of Death after Microsoft's recent automatic updates, this article that I ran across today may help you get your COMPUTER up and running again. It was a little LATE for me because I ended up buying a new computer that I apparently REALLY didn't need after reading this article. Anyway, for those of you that might be helped, you can read this article and try their fix. Prevx was alerted to the problem by users of its security software last week, Morris said. Microsoft apparently made changes to the ACCESS Control List (ACL), a list of permissions for a logged-on user. The ACL interacts with registry keys, creating visible desktop features such as a sidebar. Access Control LISTS are a feature of the NTFS file system and apply to files, not users. each user is identified by a Security Token, or SID. Access Control Lists likely reference specific user SIDs as well as the generic SIDs for such things as the everything group and "backup operators" and so forth. Registry keys also have Permissions settings as well- this is likely what is being referred to. Although being that the Access Control List is therefore stored in the registry it doesn't really interact with anything. This is one of my pet peeves, "technical" journals saying that data is interacting with anything. That simply doesn't happen; programs interact. Data is simply presented in some way which may or may not be interactive. The Sidebar is created by sidebar.exe, they are instead referring to the ACL of the registry keys that sidebar accesses as having incorrect permissions settings causing sidebar to not function. the data does not create the sidebar. the sidebar uses the data to determine what will be shown IN the sidebar. Aside from their completely incorrect technical representation of the problem though, I really have nothing to complain about it. | |
| 1886. | Solve : Black Screen of Death Hype?? | 
| Answer» Black Screen of Death Hype? We apologize to Microsoft for any inconvenience our blog may have caused. This has been a challenging issue to identify. USERS who have the black screen issue REFERRED to can still safely use our free fix tool to RESTORE their desktop icons and task bar.” MS response... http://www.fakesteve.net/2009/12/ballmer-portrait-done-in-bsods.html (just kidding) Full story Thank kkyou fro the link to the Full Story. Here is, IMO, the key point MADE by MS. Quote We’ve also checked with our worldwide Customer Service and Support organization, and they’ve told us they’re not seeing “black screen” behavior as a broad customer issue. Because these reports were not brought to us directly, it’s impossible to know conclusively what might be causing a “black screen” in those limited instances where customers have seen it. However, we do know that “black screen” behavior is associated with some malware families such as Daonol. | |
| 1887. | Solve : Windows update next week? | 
| Answer» Thursday 9pm est........................ | |
| 1888. | Solve : monthly updates- free software / apps? | 
| Answer» **** Summer Downloads *****  < northern hemi   WOW Advanced windows care is so good . I didnt even need to restart when it removed a few tracking cookies. Top program i would reccomend to anyone , that wants a healthy computer top job. From all i've read Advanced Windows Care IS a tracking cookie.... what is it that Homer says > " duhhhhh " COLi hate winzip, cant you just use regular zipped folders? winzip just confuses me. and for the limewire thing, i read a while ago that the music industry has only been sueing those who upload the music. I figure if you turn off sharing in limewire you should be good to go for a while | |
| 1889. | Solve : Download Dispatch- updated free apps ....? | 
| Answer» CNET Download.com | |
| 1890. | Solve : Vista shipped. So where are the new games?? | 
| Answer» More empty promises from Patio's mothership !  | |
| 1891. | Solve : iPhone? | 
| Answer» Link with quite a long list of some of the new iPhone shortcomings. Feel almost a little sad for all those people WAITING in line for this after reading many of these.  | |
| 1892. | Solve : More Dell Ubuntu!? | 
| Answer» Dell must be making money with linux some cool colors and some stronger specs. | |
| 1893. | Solve : Google Desktop finally arrives on Linux? | 
| Answer» Almost three years after Google Desktop’s launch in 2004 for the Windows operating system, Google has finally released a Linux version of the search application. Google Desktop enables Linux users to search for text inside OpenOffice documents, PDF and PostScript files, text and HTML, man pages, music, VIDEO and image files, web history and emails from Gmail and Thunderbird. | |
| 1894. | Solve : Intel Reveals “Larrabee” Teraflop Processor? | 
| Answer» Intel Corp., the world’s largest maker of microprocessors, has disclosed several details concerning its project code-named Larrabee. Apparently, the latter, despite of certain media reports, has no direct relation to Intel’s graphics processing UNIT’s development, but is a part of Intel’s Tera-Scale initiative, under which the company develops chips for special-purpose computing. | |
| 1895. | Solve : Two-tiered net could be coming? | 
| Answer» I'm sure EVERYONE (except ISPs) would agree this is a terrible IDEA.. | |
| 1896. | Solve : Apple takes Safari to Windows and iPhone? | 
| Answer» Quote from: The Saviour on June 16, 2007, 05:46:40 AM In addition to what michaewlewis stated, the loading time for PAGES, IMHO, are actually quite good. To me, this ALONE is enough to sell me on it. Quite the opposite for me. I've been testing out the latest version and load times are painfully slow. I do LIKE the LOOK of it, though. And it will be useful when designing sites for optimal COMPATIBILITY. | |
| 1897. | Solve : Microsoft entering the low-cost PC sales biz; first stop India? | 
| Answer» MICROSOFT will begin selling PCs in India next month as part of its "Unlimited Potential" PROGRAM, an event that will mark the SOFTWARE giant's first entry into the PC sales business. Dubbed the IQ PC, the machines will cost RS21,000 (about $525), are manufactured in partnership with Zenith, and will sport AMD Athlon CPUs. Link | |
| 1898. | Solve : Super-soldiers may get brain-chip? | 
| Answer» October 24, 2005  | |
| 1899. | Solve : Dell says Linux is not for business? | 
| Answer» SMEs must buy Windows | |
| 1900. | Solve : Breakthrough brings 'Star Trek' teleport a step closer? | 
| Answer» Less pollution Flying cars, next you will be reading the news paper about how someone came up and upended That would be so sweet to have a transporter.. No more driving...Is that a bad thing?Think of all those bus and TAXI drivers......Quote from: Carbon Dudeoxide on June 18, 2007, 09:34:49 PM Quote from: Beta Quadrant on June 17, 2007, 03:03:14 PMPoor Fat Driver...That would be so sweet to have a transporter.. No more driving...Is that a bad thing?Think of all those bus and taxi drivers...... But still, with all those jobs gone, there will be many more, such as teleportation mechanic, or teleportation supervisor etc. etc.Yeah but like (hundreds of) thousands of taxi and bus drivers here in Hong Kong. Not all of them can become a mechanic or supervisor....... And yes, poor fat driver. The picture attached below is one of our school bus drivers. Me and my friends call him Fat Driver because we don't know his name. He runs so many red lights [cleaning up - attachment deleted by admin]fat driver rules. Btw.. Teleportation won't work with humans the way they're trying to make it work. a good way to understand what i'm about to say is the Hugh Jackman movie ''The Prestige''. if you try to teleport people, you will need 3 points. A (the human to be teleported), B (The point the human will be teleported to), and C (the ''collision'' point i call it). Point A will start the process which will bring it on it's way of photon entanglement to point B, Point B having an object in it's spot already that's capable of creating human form, and point C will be sent at the same time. i call point C the collision point because it's the point that A collides (obviously) to give C the data it needs for the teleportation. C will take over from A after having the physiological data that it needs and will be sent to point B, Point A and the human sent with it DESTROYED during the information transfer. point C will arrive at point B with the information and ready for another transfer, which means during the transfer point C will also *die*, leaving only point B standing, as a perfect replica of point A... but not really... there will be no way to have all the mentalities and personality of point A (the original human) in point B. if point A had not been destroyed (this is possible to achieve, easier even), then there would be the origianal human and the teleported one. all teleportation is, is cloning basically, but the first human dies. yay! congratulations you just killed someone. the second human will be standing there wondering how he got there. you will go up to him and ask him if his memories are all fine and everything and he will say yes (if the possibility of having teleported memories is possible by then too). but he will only have a copy of the original human. he will only BE a copy, and he isn't the same person. EVERY single cell and molecule and action he ever does or has done is exactly the same as the original human, even his memories, but he's not the same. just a copy. if the original is kept alive during the teleportation then you will have to kill the copy after it's done it's little bit in the world, but, that copy is now also a human being. for these reasons alone, i am against teleportation. no matter how it's done, someone has to die. same with animals and non-living things. (teleportation has been acheived with an apple by the way, by australian scientists about 6 months ago. the original was destroyed and the replica tasted exactly the same. no decay.) apart from that it'd be fine, i think it would be really useful, but with a massive price TAG, and would probably also need to be used in conjunction with your pc. note that windows galactica probably won't support teleportation if you have less than 512 terabytes of RAM and/or did not install the 128 terabit version Testing 1,2,3 hello.test.... ignore this.... (feel free to delete it)Just testing this apparently broken post.Quote Or have (like in halo) a teleporter and a reciever so you can only go from one place to another. HMMMM....... A stargate!Hmmmm....... Don't get excited, I'm just playing.so is this topic still even alive even though it doesn't work?Its a nice little play ground. But you have to teleport in. Reaper, I am not reading all that, as insightful as it may be Quote from: 2k_dummy on June 25, 2007, 10:37:18 AM Its a nice little play ground. But you have to teleport in.Our predicament kinda suits this topic, doesn't it? Quote from: 2k_dummy on June 22, 2007, 05:30:04 AM QuoteIsn't that from StarCraft? Procross can teleport to those moving transporter things (don't know the name), you know.Or have (like in halo) a teleporter and a reciever so you can only go from one place to another. ~~Dark Blade: Legend of Time, Space, and BeyondQuote from: Dark Blade on June 27, 2007, 04:42:41 AM i was always under the impression that a stargate was from the show/movie stargate... could be wrong | |