So far, all the men with whom I have come in contact, are selfish; why

1.	So far, all the men with whom I have come in contact, are selfish; why should I not infer, therefore, that man is selfish?It involves the fallacy of1. Petitio principii2. Illicit generalization3. Four terms4. None of the above
Answer» Correct Answer - Option 2 : Illicit generalization The correct answer is Illicit generalization. Illicit generalization: It is also called the Hasty or Overgeneralization Fallacy. In this fallacy, the person assumes the conclusion is true based on small evidence. Example: Recently, some beggars in the street path looted a man. All beggars are just as clever behind innocent faces. This example shows that based on one piece of evidence the person concludes all beggars as thieves and criminals. Such type of fallacy must be avoided as it will be dangerous. Petitio Principii It is also called 'Begging the Question'. In this fallacy, the person assumes the conclusion is true without any proof supporting it. Four Terms: Quaternion Terminorum is a Latin term meaning Fallacy of four terms. This fallacy occurs when a syllogism has 4 terms rather than 3. It includes statistical syllogism, hypothetical syllogism, and categorical syllogism. Example: All men are robots, All robots are cars, All cars are buses. In this example, there are four terms: Men, Robots, Cars, and Buses. This makes the statement invalid as it requires one term common to both premises.

So far, all the men with whom I have come in contact, are selfish; why should I not infer, therefore, that man is selfish?It involves the fallacy of1. Petitio principii2. Illicit generalization3. Four terms4. None of the above

Answer» Correct Answer - Option 2 : Illicit generalization

The correct answer is Illicit generalization.

Petitio Principii
- It is also called 'Begging the Question'.
- In this fallacy, the person assumes the conclusion is true without any proof supporting it.
Four Terms:
- Quaternion Terminorum is a Latin term meaning Fallacy of four terms.
- This fallacy occurs when a syllogism has 4 terms rather than 3.
- It includes statistical syllogism, hypothetical syllogism, and categorical syllogism.
- Example: All men are robots, All robots are cars, All cars are buses.
  - In this example, there are four terms: Men, Robots, Cars, and Buses.
    - This makes the statement invalid as it requires one term common to both premises.