

InterviewSolution
This section includes InterviewSolutions, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
101. |
Solve : Ubuntu 9.10 on usb stick?? possible or NOT?? |
Answer» alright, i just bought a 16gb lexar jump drive and want to install ubuntu 9.10 on it, making the jump drive a external computer, but having questions like, am i still able to use the jump drive when not using ubuntu and whether i will have tp repartition the drive and how to do it so i dont do any damage to to flash drive and be still able to erase ubuntu and use it as a normal flash drive again if ever needed. I have the LIVE CD of ubuntu so im ready just need instructions on how to do this and with all the questions above answered please. am i still able to use the jump drive when not using ubuntuYes. You can use EASEUS Partition Manager or the Ubuntu installer to partition the flash drive-1 partition for ubuntu, 1 partition for regular Windows use, for example. If you ever want to delete Ubuntu, just remove the partition.*CENSORED*, what i need is to be able to boot ubuntu 9.10 or any other version off my jump drive but when im running of my normal hard drive use the USB as external HDD which happens to have ubuntu on it, so i can access all the files using one partition. what im generally asking from you is if i install ubuntu 11.04 using universal USB installer and i plug my usb into a machine running on its hard drive will i still be able to use it as a jump drive and share the same partition with ubuntu and my personal files from when im not using ubuntu from the jump drive? Quote from: comda on September 14, 2011, 03:42:04 PM what im generally asking from you is if i install ubuntu 11.04 using universal USB installer and i plug my usb into a machine running on its hard drive will i still be able to use it as a jump drive and share the same partition with ubuntu and my personal files from when im not using ubuntu from the jump drive? yes, if your other OS can read the file system on the jump drive. alright thats good, but one more thing, when i tried to use the universal USB installer it said it would reinstall the MBR? is that a bad idea? As long as you don't have any other operating systems installed on the flash drive. Installing the MBR makes your PC recognize the flash drive as a boot device. Make sure that you are really installing the MBR to the flash drive, not to another drive... alright so i got ubuntu 10.04 working fully on my 16 gn flash drive but when i plug it in on my macbook when its not using ubuntu its says its not formated same as windows XP. why can i get into the jump drive and us it as a slave drive? Hard to figure. Here is what My USB stick looks like with Ubuntu on it. It is only 2 GB. no, you have the ubuntu installer on your usb drive i actaully installed ubuntu like my jump drive is a hard drive, but it wont run as a slave when in using normal hard drive to boot os. Quote from: comda on September 19, 2011, 08:32:48 PM no, you have the ubuntu installer on your usb drive i actaully installed ubuntu like my jump drive is a hard drive, but it wont run as a slave when in using normal hard drive to boot os.You said jump drive. Most sources say a jump drive is a flash USB device.Do you mean you have a hard drive on a USB adapter? This problem is getting realllly convoluted-I'll try to simplify it... 1) You can turn your flash drive into a ubuntu live cd with UNETbootin/YUMI. 2) You will then be able to boot to ubuntu Live CD from your flash drive/jump drive/pen drive/thumb drive/zip drive/whatever. I mean portable flash drive(e.g. Sandisk Cruzer), not portable hard drive with a cable. 3) You can make 2 partitions on your usb drive-install ubuntu on the first, and use the second for document/file storage. I do this. You can save files in ubuntu to the second partition and they will be readable in Windows/Mac (PROVIDED the 2nd partition is formatted with FAT32.) EDIT: You can do the full installation on a 4GB+ USB Flash drive,( and USB hard drive). Just tried with a live cd(in a real DVD drive). You can do the same with WUBI too: http://www.pendrivelinux.com/move-wubi-to-a-usb-flash-drive/ |
|
102. |
Solve : UNetbootin -Put Linux on USB? |
Answer» Recently found this: IntroductionHas anybody tried it? ? Quote from: Geek-9pm on August 23, 2011, 01:00:24 AM Has anybody tried it? ? Yep. I use it all the time. I use an alternative to UNetbootin, which supports creating a Bootable Windows Vista/7 install flash drive along with the linux distros. It also allows you to try unsupported ISOs, such as, say, the Seagate disk check tool, or HIREN's boot CD, or BartPE. http://www.pendrivelinux.com/yumi-multiboot-usb-creator/ YUMI.I've been using grub4dos to do this, I have 3 ISOs, Windows 7 Windows 7 System Repair CD, Windows 7 PE, and linuxmint 9 live CD on a pen drive. There are many good and stable utilities that will HELP you to create a Live USB Stick with your favourite distribution. Fedora has also a default utility for that which is called "Fedora Live USB Creator" (See https://fedorahosted.org/liveusb-creator/). I think that same applies to Ubuntu, which comes with a similar utility. uNetbootin is an excellent choice as well and you've nothing to lose. Go ahead, install it, play with it. It works pretty well and can be used with most Linux Distributions and other free OSes. |
|
103. |
Solve : sed command? |
Answer» Hi EVERYBODY! |
|
104. |
Solve : Can Unix Include files/other code? |
Answer» If so, does the calling/master program have full access to all lines of code in the CALLED file? |
|
105. |
Solve : importing? |
Answer» How do I import applications such as email, AT&T Communications Manager, etc. from Windows Vista to Linux? I don't want to REMOVE them from Windows, just add the various things I want from Windows Vista to Linux. How do I import applications such as email, AT&T Communications Manager, etc. from Windows Vista to Linux? I don't want to remove them from Windows, just add the various things I want from Windows Vista to Linux.For most Windows-based programs, there are Linux alternatives. And many programs are available on both platforms (e.g. Firefox, OpenOffice). Wine is not a straightforward route, since many programs won't run well under Wine - or will run slowly. Wine is improving all the time; you just need to UNDERSTAND that programs can't simply be moved from one to the other. Windows and Linux are very different beasts.PS You might find this website useful: http://www.osalt.com/All the windows programs will not work in ubuntu by using wine.If you really want to use windows programs in Linux,you should use virtual machine called VIRTUALBOX. It is a free software.by installing this software It is possible to use windows and Linux at the same time and in the same desktop.for more information about it you can visit its website.www.virtualbox.org No need to bump two month old threads...I am posting not to get a REPLY hacker boy. Quote from: mrlmohan on October 05, 2011, 10:19:54 AM I am posting not to get a reply hacker boy. Please observe an acceptable standard of politeness and behaviour as laid down in the forum rules that you have agreed to observe. As previously observed, this is an old thread. ok ok... |
|
106. |
Solve : microSD won't show on Ubuntu? |
Answer» hello, Both are not recognized on my computer .Are you sure? Does the computer never acknowledges that you put in a new device? What about the disk manager in administrator tools? Uhh. no.. not in Linux. You have to mount it. I have several micro SD cards and adapter. A few were bad. Most of them work. Check you camera documentation to see if that is an alternative format for the card. Also, make sure you send the pictures to the removable SD card, not just leave them in the cell phone internal memory. A 2GB micro SD card is very cheap. But they are slow. Don't be surprised that it TAKES a bit for the OS to recognize it. The fact the a regular stick can be READ by Ubuntu would indicate that the adapters may be flaky LIKE I said, I got some of them. Adapters now are DIRT cheap, but if you buy a dozen, most should work. Buy it from a major vendor and RMA if it don't work. http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=2GB+micro+SD+with+USB&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=shop&cid=17157109873614143400&sa=X&ei=cHWKTr3jHaqFsgKeqbmWBA&ved=0CIsBEPMCMAM Well, I've never had any problems on Ubuntu, even with "chinese" memory cards that I bought from the net. Maybe you should get/borrow an alternative card reader and see if that works. Also, which version of Ubuntu are you currently using?james64k, Come to think abut it, your are right. It is almost always the card reader that is flaky. You jogged my memory. About a quarter of the darers I have bought are unreliable. Goat them on eBay from Hong Kong. Old men tend to forget bad memories.I had them adapters replaced and bought a data cable and a loose MicroSD instead. And this seems to work . I use Ubuntu 11.04. I does recognisze my "old" USB memory stick (1 GB) but not the USB card adapter. And the adpater worked fine at the laptop of the guy in the shop when I brought it back to have it replaced. |
|
107. |
Solve : Help Regarding JNI ERROR? |
Answer» i am using TAU and i am facing the problem of JNI error that JNI cannot FIND TAU_HOME ALTHOUGH i have imported all the paths.You might need to provide a bit more information about what TAU and JNI are... Quote from: Rob POMEROY on October 07, 2011, 02:52:50 AM You might need to provide a bit more information about what TAU and JNI are... JNI is Java Native Interface. Although that is pretty much a guess, so I have no idea what they are TALKING about, either. Googling TAU_HOME +$ENV lead me to this page: http://code.google.com/p/qmcpack/source/browse/trunk/CMake/FindTau.cmake?r=4936 Which states: Code: [Select]# this module look for tau (http://www.boost.org) support Which leads me to believe tau is a boost library, or something. I cannot find any reference to either java or tau on those pages, though. |
|
108. |
Solve : installing/using Linux? |
Answer» I've heard about Linux for years but have never personally seen it in use or used it myself. However I've always heard people say how they thought it is better than Windows and have wanted to try it. I already used the distribution chooser to get a recommendation on which would be the best one for me and am considering getting a copy, partitioning my hard drive and installing the Linux on the partition. There is no need to install anti virus in Linux computer because windows viruses will not work in Linux.Very true. But viruses written for Linux will work on it. Quote Linux is the safest OS in the world.No it's not. What about Haiku? Or FreeBSD? or OpenBSD? And remember, safest != secure; any semblance of "safety" that Linux has from viruses isn't because it's inherently more secure, but because it's not targeted. Nobody is going to waste their time WRITING malware for an OS that is around a single percent of all desktop users because they can invest the same amount of work into a virus that can work on 90% of them. Quote Ubuntu is the best Linux Variant out there.And this is just plain laughable. First of all, the term "Linux Variant"- even as noted on this forum's profile information page- makes no sense. Linux doesn't have "variants" it has distros. My point being that they are all the same tree, just with different junebugs stuck in their sap. On another note, distro choosers are sort of pointless. You'll need to try distributions for yourself to see if they fit. My personal recommendation would be Linux Mint, which I've found to be far better than Ubuntu in nearly every way. It's "Mint Menu" also somewhat mimics the behaviour of the start menu.Its true that Viruses written for Linux will work on it.but I am using Ubuntu for 5 years.my computer is online 12 hrs a day.I didn't got a single virus infection in my computer.I agree that Mac OS X and Open source BSD are the safest Operating Systems in the world. But when it comes to using it as a server, Linux is still one of the safest operating systems out there. You can make a Linux server very hard to crack into. You just have to be willing to learn about it and make sure that you know what you are doing....The OP has used Windows and he wants to learn about Linux. It is alright to be passionate, but let's not scare him with too much information. Linux Mint is good, But load a short version that fits on a CD. A n novice does not need all the stuff. For a broad yet short review of most everything out there, the link below is a good read. Free and non-free Operating Systems I still believe newcomers should start with a minimal Linux that can run "Live" with very low overhead. Puppy Linux. Or one of the early Knoppix distros. Quote from: mrlmohan on October 05, 2011, 12:34:17 AM But I am using Ubuntu for 5 years.my computer is online 12 hrs a day.I didn't got a single virus infection in my computer.Anecdotal. I've been running windows 7 since it was released, and this machine is usually on nearly 24 hours a day and it's yet to get infected, but I don't fool myself into thinking I am inherently secure. Quote But when it comes to using it as a server, Linux is still one of the safest operating systems out there. You can make a Linux server very hard to crack into. You just have to be willing to learn about it and make sure that you know what you are doing....Not sure what makes you think they plan to use it in a server environment. Way to move the goalposts, though.I didn't say Linux is fully secure.Every OS has a loophole.but when compared to windows,Linux is better and secure.If you don't know that why do u call yourself as a programmer??LOL. I think you are addicted to windows.I have a doubt.are you here for arguing or helping??..May be you have more knowledge than others.use your knowledge to help others.don't use it for unnecessary arguing. Best Wishes Quote from: mrlmohan on October 05, 2011, 10:12:50 AM are you here for arguing or helping??..May be you have more knowledge than others.use your knowledge to help others.don't use it for unnecessary arguing. Good advice. You should follow it yourself. YES BOSS Quote from: mrlmohan on October 05, 2011, 10:12:50 AM I didn't say Linux is fully secure. You said "Linux is the safest OS in the world" Which is dead wrong. It's not "safer" than any other OS, and you are misguiding others if you tell them so. Quote Every OS has a loophole. Sigh. No, everyOS needs to be properly secured by the user or whomever installed it. You can't just go with the default options and assume your safe, this goes for any OS, and on the case of Linux especially for servers, since there is plenty of written malware for them, not to mention sendmail, that constant source of exploits. My point is, it doesn't matter what the OS is that you are using, none of them are "safer" than any other. That just doesn't make sense. It's like saying that a Trailer truck is "safer" than a Mazda Miata. The entire point isn't to be "safer" when in a car crash, the point is to prevent them entirely. Quote but when compared to windows,Linux is better and secure.Yep, Linux is so secure, even kernel.org got hacked via a ROOT privilege escalation. As for servers, sure, Linux servers really aren't that hard to use/run. Until they are. Then it takes two weeks of web searching, forum-hopping, reading blog posts that explain how to fix your exact issue on a version from eight years ago and so it isn't even slightly applicable anymore so why the *censored* is it the top search result on every major search engine, getting called stupid by various elitist Linux communities when you ask for help, pissing off an entire Linux community when you try to prevent the name-calling by starting with "I don't know much Linux so please walk me through this" and getting called stupid instead of getting answers to something that "everyone should already know", getting told to just use Google (which of course gives me old blog posts and forum topics from eight years ago and isn't the least bit helpful) by elitists who "don't have the time to ANSWER every newb's questions" but apparently have plenty of time to sit on forums and call them names all day, getting sick of said elitist communities and reformatting and reinstalling Linux to see if that helps (which it doesn't), finally having someone who is willing to help give you some big long list of commands to type in and then calling you stupid and leaving when you ask what it means, and eventually you just say "Screw this, I'm buying a Windows license." Quote If you don't know that why do u call yourself as a programmer??LOL.What does operating system security or OS choice have to do with programming? Absolutely nothing. This is a argument to irrelevance. Quote I think you are addicted to windows.my laptop runs Mint 10.(Which brings up another point I will get to) I don't think it's a case of me being "addicted to windows" (what a silly concept) But rather me actually being realistic and not a Linux zealot. Not everybody who sees it thinks it's some sort of cure for cancer. In fact if anything, on the desktop, it's still a solution in search of a problem. At the moment it's primary selling point is "It's not Windows!" Which only goes so far. It's come far but it still hardly compares UI wise to even windows 95, and on the server somehow despite it being there from nearly the beginning windows server is making huge inroads in it's markets. Quote are you here for arguing or helping??Both. I see far too many people paint this happy jolly picture of Linux where the person doesn't have to do anything and everything works. And then when that person has issues suddenly the people painting those jolly pictures dissappear, leaving the people who are realistic and actually know what they are doing to clean up the mess. Did I say they shouldn't try Linux? NO! I didn't say that. I was arguing against your FUD that Linux is "safer" which implies that it is inherently more secure, which it isn't. They are merely different Operating Systems. There is no reason Not to diversify and learn them all, but to fool oneself into thinking they are somehow "safer" is just plain foolish, and to spread the FUD that it is is doing Linux a disservice. As to my running of Mint 10, after the release of Mint 11, I realized something. There is no supported way to actually upgrade a existing system to a new version without wiping it. The only way I found would be to direct aptitude to the repos for Mint 11, but that was unsupported and PROBABLY not a good idea (And it's important to note that it is considered a bad idea by the same people that still thing vi is a good configuration UI). This is probably the biggest shortfall I've encountered so far, aside from having to edit config files for nearly any change I make (really takes me back to windows 3.1, that). But I do digress. to Answer the OP's questions: Quote is there any danger is using Linux instead of Windows?No. Quote Is it more vulnerable to collecting any viruses or spyware when surfing the web?No. Quote Does it come with or is it compatible with anti-virus software that commonly runs in Windows OS?No, and No, however there are some AV programs you can find that run on Linux, like ClamAV. Typically the Linux approach is to not run an AV at all and assume everything is safe, which has worked out in a Rube-Goldberg fashion since nobody has been bothered to write any high-saturation Linux viruses that attack desktop machines. Most of them target servers, and those that do target desktops aren't "distributed" in a way that the typical desktop user will encounter them. Quote Is it compatible with programs that would have run in Windows?No, but there are almost always alternatives. If there is a Windows Program you absolutely need to use, you shouldn't be running Linux at all! WINE is not quite mature in it's support of a lot of the Windows APIs. Usually if the program is complicated enough not to have a Linux equivalent, the windows version isn't going to run on WINE. Very seldom will there be a Windows program you absolutely must have that doesn't have a windows equivalent, unless you are into some professional level stuff. (and even then, LMMS is pretty on par with FLStudio, and even (IMO) somewhat easier to navigate). Anyway, to summarize- No, it's not compatible with programs that run on Windows. But you won't need them, since there are Linux equivalents. Quote My laptop has Windows Vista 32-bit. Could I expect any clashes or issues with the hardware since the laptop was intended for Windows OS?I wouldn't say so. But it depends on the distro you choose, as well. I would suggest trying several, and seeing which works best for you. Ideally via the method geek-9pm noted, via a LiveCD of the distribution. This way you can see how well it works for you, bearing in mind that it will of course run much faster of your HD than from the disc.BC_Programmer, This is one of those times I agree with you. Put simply Linux is not Windows. And vice versa. Personally, I have been using Linux long before many others. I I got deeply involved in it. As I recall, I used Red Hat version 5 or 6. Don't remember. At the moment, I can use Windows XP on a Dell laptop because it came with Windows XP. It also have Vista and Linux Mint on it. At the moment, I know longer have the Linux on the hard drive. There are some issues doing a triple boot selection for XP, Vista and Linux. But I can always boot the "Live" version whenever I want. I have one version on a USB flash drive. There are a number of reasons for a preference of one OS over another. And they go beyond the technical details, The concerns becomes more conflicts of perception and objective. OP, don't this all the ranting discourage you. Learning something new to you can be a happy experience. Give Linux a try. From your own perspective. Quote from: Geek-9pm on October 05, 2011, 01:26:54 PM There are a number of reasons for a preference of one OS over another. And they go beyond the technical details, The concerns becomes more conflicts of perception and objective. Personally I find people who are zealots for any OS (whatever it is) an utter bore. I know that computers, cars, planes, weapons, etc can have a kind of "TOYS for boys" fascination for a certain type of (generally male) personality. I like railway engines myself. But the people who get obsessed with, and zealous over, software such as operating systems or text editors or programming and scripting languages really get my goat. The most severe cases probably have some kind of medical condition or other, get-a-life-itis or maybe something else that they take Adderall for. Quote from: Salmon Trout on October 05, 2011, 01:57:31 PM Personally I find people who are zealots for any OS (whatever it is) an utter bore. I know that computers, cars, planes, weapons, etc can have a kind of "toys for boys" fascination for a certain type of (generally male) personality. I like railway engines myself. But the people who get obsessed with, and zealous over, software such as operating systems or text editors or programming and scripting languages really get my goat. The most severe cases probably have some kind of medical condition or other, get-a-life-itis or maybe something else that they take Adderall for. So very true. |
|
109. |
Solve : Redhat 9 hungs during booting.? |
Answer» Hi everyone, i just installed Linux Redhat 9 on my machine with xp already installed. They are on separate partitions. After the installation, everything seems to work fine and i decided to restart the system only to have the Redhat hunging during bootup. It can hung for all you can think of without displaying anything and portraying a dark screen. |
|
110. |
Solve : unix command? |
Answer» I am trying to list just the # of users logged in not name or username just NUMBER |
|
111. |
Solve : Ubuntu: text missing on some websites? |
Answer» hello , boxes with the quotes of other postswere all empty. A wikipedia article that I had looked up had no main text at all, only the title and the language list and such on the LEFT seemed as usual. Do you have any advice why this could be and how to fix this? Apart form that everything works REALLY great, so far I only installed Flash plug-in for watching YOUTUBE and videos from TV stations. I am PRETTY sure that Installing the correct locale will do the trick I wish I knew how this is done in Ubuntu (I am only using Fedora), but you can find more information in this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LocaleWhich is your browser??.. No need to bump two month old threads... |
|
112. |
Solve : How to switch back to windows!!?...? |
Answer» Hi GUYS! |
|
113. |
Solve : Problem with permissions? |
Answer» I am a designer and wanted to put Drupal on my linux system (Ubuntu) just to muck around with. Which I have successfully done. But I can't add any modules to my files, I am coming up with permission problems. I have tried over and over to read what to do but am having no success I really need a walk through. I have USED the ls -al command to find the permissions which have come up as: |
|
114. |
Solve : X keeps crashing and locking up the terminal? |
Answer» I'm running a VectorLinux box here, and X crashes every now and then. However, when it crashes, the console (physical console, as in keyboard and monitor) lock up, so I can't change to a text console. I am able to log in still through SSH, however. |
|
115. |
Solve : terminal command for grub bootloader? |
Answer» I run ubuntu 10.10 and I NEED to back up the GRUB bootloader to obtain the menu LIST. I wish to RESIZE my hard drive so as to enable me to install windows xp side by side. I have tried the command for version 9.04 but this just gives me a blank screen. any help out there ?cp /boot/grub/menu.lst /boot/grub/menu.lst_backupYou do realize that you will have to reinstall GRUB from the Ubuntu live CD. Right? |
|
116. |
Solve : displaying date and time? |
Answer» i use the DATE command to DISPLAY date and TIME but I WANT it in simple oct 29 2011date "+%b %d %y" |
|
117. |
Solve : Mini hp - OS?? |
Answer» Hi everyone, The liitle thing is slow. As far as i know this is because of its frequencies.. Yes, mostly, but your OS is probably bloated as well. Quote My question is: would i benefit from installing linux? Would the little bugger get faster? Would there be any drawbacks to having linux on it? I assume that you are not gaming on that thing, so yes, I think you should. If you've never used linux before, it will take a little getting used to, but you will still be ABLE to perform the tasks you normally would, just in a different way. I would try Kubuntu or Puppy. Ubuntu is good too, but I prefer the Kubuntu interface. (Kubuntu is technically Ubuntu with a different look)I did actually game on it (poor thing had to work really hard but I no longer do that since I have another bigger pc. Do you think the improvement ( speed and responsiveness) of it will be at least NOTICEABLE? Couldn't I have both OSs installed? It's got 2 separate hard-disks... Thanks G.If you ask me, (which nobody did, but I'm going to ANSWER anyway) if you have to ask "Will Linux work for me?" The answer is probably no. And to be fair, nobody can answer that question for you, anyway. Only way to know would be to try it and see; it might, it might not. Quote would i benefit from installing linux?There is no real benefit from installing Linux compared to other Operating Systems. Quote Would the little bugger get faster?It might. but it might even get slower; depending on the hardware and how well it is supported, as well as how many distros you're willing to try. I'd say that whatever you do, try it with a Dual Boot with Windows 7 as you have it now. Quote Would there be any drawbacks to having linux on it?Plenty. 1. You won't be able to run windows applications. While there are a lot of Open Source equivalents for many popular applications, the truth is that the vast majority of software is crap. Whether it happens to be Open Source seems to change that opinion for some people, but it's still true. WINE can be used to run many Windows Applications, but I personally feel that defeats the purpose, and also WINE just introduces it's own set of problems. Quote Do you think the improvement ( speed and responsiveness) of it will be at least noticeable?Any speed improvement you see, unless you happen to choose a distro designed to be super fast and light, will not be as a result of using Linux over Windows but probably more simply the result of the Linux installation being a clean install, whereas the Windows installation was bogged down with manufacturer-installed crap. Installing Linux/FreeBSD on such a machine is far easier than getting a Windows CD to do a fresh install of Windows, though. Just wanted to add that I tried Ubuntu 10.10 on my netbook that is running the dual-core atom CPU and it ran ok, but I had driver issues with trying to find a wifi driver. I ended up having to use a wrapped ndis driver for the wifi device to get wifi to work. Definately not something that a person new to Linux would want to be up against, unless they like a challenge. For better performance I downgraded from Windows 7 and 1GB Ram to Windows XP Pro SP3 and 1GB Ram and its a screaming machine now vs when it was running 7. 1GB of Ram is not enough for Windows 7 to perform well... I always suggest 2GB minimum for Windows 7. Also the Intel Atom Processor line is not a speed demon CPU anyways, its a CPU that was designed to be an electron sipper for netbooks to last longer periods of time on their batteries as well as not pump out lots of heat like other processors. They are a GREEN Processor that are best suited as a non gaming CPU, and used for web surfing, work type apps that are not CPU intensive, and watching a movie through netflix etc which just about makes them break a sweat. Quote from: nixie on November 12, 2011, 03:20:06 PM
My netbook has the same specs as the OPs and it runs Windows 7 starter quite well. Of course, it's NOWHERE near as fast as one of my desktop computers, but I wouldn't describe it as slow. Quote from: nixie on November 12, 2011, 03:20:06 PM Just wanted to add that I tried Ubuntu 10.10 on my netbook that is running the dual-core atom CPU and it ran ok, but I had driver issues with trying to find a wifi driver. Really? What brand of netbook is that? I've installed Ubuntu on Acer and HP netbooks and didn't have the first problem with drivers. Toshiba Netbook is the one I had issues with wifi and linux, but I still have that wrapped driver in case I ever need it again. And yah as far as speed goes that was my comparison as well was compared to my desktop system. I'd rank the Atom processors as P4 speed equivilant even though they benchmark better than a common P4. I did squeeze out better performance by going into the bios and making the CPU run full speed vs throttled to save power.gia003, you should try a few linux distributions (like Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE) from a live USB stick; you can use unetbootin (http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/) for that. Boot from the live usb stick and start exploring that distribution: see if your hardware is recognised and working correctly, perform some basic tasks and get used to it. If you like it, then go ahead and install that distribution permanently to your hard drive. If you don't like it at all, then go back to Windows; but give Linux a try at least. Personally, I'm very confident to say that any of the distributions that I suggested above will work out of the box (= your hardware will be working fine). |
|
118. |
Solve : Tar Command Help? |
Answer» Hi there, |
|
119. |
Solve : WINE question? |
Answer» So I was thinking about replacing Windows with Linux such as Ubuntu or Fedora and use WINE for my games that are mostly Win32 based. but it would be neat to sever my dependency on Micro$oft and go FREE with Linux someday.Why do people get it in their head that Linux is the only free alternative? What about ReactOS, or FreeBSD, or OpenBSD? and honestly, the people who use those operating systems aren't hyperactive zealots which ought to make them a lot more attractive. Quote Maybe some day some group will make a SuperWINE that is less like trying to put a diaper on a buffalo for games etc sort of like a DOSBOX for Linux, but for Win32 games vs DOS. Or even better... the game manufacturers start to make games that are LINUX READY for the larger more popular distros!!!There are two good reasons that popular (I mean, things like, say, Just Cause 2, or Crysis, etc) aren't released for Linux. First, there is of course market share. A lot more people run windows, and making a Linux variant of the game makes the test matrix nearly infinite, as they now have to make sure the proper libs are installed, and they have to choose those libraries, and they have to make sure that if they need a newer version of the library some other application isn't using the currently installed older version, and if so they have no choice since Linux doesn't afaik have any support for Side by side library installations. Add to all that the fact that various distributions have different default libraries and different versions of those libraries released via their update mechanisms which could very well break any lib dependencies of something like a game, the fact that 3-D acceleration is about on par with windows 95/98, in that you have to fight with drivers and applications to get anything but software rendering (not helped by the fact that Driver manufacturers REALIZE there is no point in fully supporting 3-D since that isn't typically what a Linux user wants to do anyway). Linux is an awesome server OS that has a excellent CLI, but it's desktop environments leave a lot to be desired. For one thing, none of them an agree on it; Unity? Gnome? KDE? LXDE? Some might argue that it's about "choice" but it's more about Not-Invented-Here syndrome. Linux is not a replacement for windows, and will never be. There will not be a "year of the linux desktop" in the foreseeable future. They are different Operating Systems designed by different groups of people originally to perform completely different tasks and with different design goals. Linux would be a far better contender on the desktop if it wasn't for it's community constantly resorting to blame-shifting to account for bugs or omissions, and they of course fall back on the "It's free so you can't complain" argument sometimes, or "it's open source so you can fix it yourself". Yes, I could, but I need to software to do a job, I'm not using it because I'm bored and need a task to do. In any case, when it comes to games, either settle for the games already available for Linux (and despite what you note, plenty of spectacular games have been developed for it, just so long as you aren't after ridiculously over-the-top graphics). Plenty of indie titles run on it just fine, although I have found that a lot of them require you to do some funky things due to conflicting lib versions. it's either that, or accept that Linux is not a Operating System that is conducive to playing games. It's an awesome Server OS, though (which always makes me wonder why there are "Server" variants of the popular distros). My laptop is currently running a LAMP server and serves a subdomain of my website, and I can hardly tell, aside from it being generally warmer than usual. Quote I can see a SuperWINE type project coming to be,No. WINE is designed to allow programs written against the windows API to run on Linux. And for that purpose, it works perfectly fine. It has a few bugs but most of those are either corner cases or programs trying to call a Windows API function incorrectly and WINE reacting differently than the Windows API function. It is not designed to allow things like DirectX to be used on Linux. That was not it's goal. It is not a "Windows Emulator" (like say WoW (Windows on Windows) on windows itself), that is right in it's name, in face (WINE Is Not an Emulator). It is a "compatibility" library, which provides Windows API services to applications that expect it, as well as PROVIDING the functionality to start those programs. There will not be a "superWINE" the concept is in fact LUDICROUS. WINE itself is a spectacular and constantly evolving compatibility shim that does what it was designed to do 99.9% of the time. To suggest that a new project will not only do what WINE does but also allow for the use of DirectX and native windows OpenGL support, Windows Audio, WASAPI, and who knows what else merely to allow people to play games for windows on Linux is just plain silly. Linux is not for running Windows Games and never should be. if you want to run windows games, you run windows or wait for a port. Warranted, this is coming from somebody whose favourite games all run on both platforms (Minecraft, Emulation). The difficulty of course comes with the fact that newer games use the hardware to it's limit, and because each Operating System deals with hardware differently so to would the games, which would overcomplicated things. As a side note, calling Microsoft "Micro$oft" is not cool unless you are an overweight grubby 17 year old Linux zealot whose hands have a constant coating of cheetos. Either that, or you frequent slashdot or are one of Stallmans concubines. Generally I would ASSUME any persons approach to an issue would be to find the method that provides the most flexibility and does it in the easiest fashion, particularly since for a lot of scenarios, while the Microsoft solution might cost money (let's compare say IIS to apache), it might also save money; if you already know C# but know nothing of PHP, for example, ASP.NET is going to be a lot easier to learn and work with then diving into Apache and learning PHP from scratch. Of course it won't hurt to learn PHP, but if you need that web server up "yesterday" you don't exactly have time to be poring over man pages and PHP/MySQL documentation. naturally the converse proves true, it will be faster and more cost-effective to use a LAMP server if you know PHP and nothing of C# or other .NET languages (which isn't atypical, given that Mono is regarded as "evil" purely based on it's choice of license). What needs to happen with Linux, is they need to stop infighting about pedantic crap and arguing about philosophy and "get 'er done". You cannot sell even free software purely on philosophical merit, at least not to everybody. Essentially that is what seems to have happened with FreeBSD. How often do you hear somebody extoll the virtues of FreeBSD? Not often. But they exist. Linux zealots are the loudest to the point that it seems people feel it is the only existing free alternative, when it is neither the only one nor likely to be the best, and even if it was, one cannot know that without exploring the other options. In a way this sort of illustrates the problem with zealotry on either side (windows, or Linux, or any of the other systems (OSX, FreeBSD). The reason is that in order to properly argue against, say, Windows users, you need to learn enough about windows to create that argument. And by the time you do, it's too late, you are now a windows user. Same with Linux. I see a lot of ignorant arguments against Linux as much as there are about Windows, In order to properly argue against "linux users" you would need to learn about Linux, and again, by the time you do it's too late and you've become one yourself. Warranted, you can of course subjectively compare Operating Systems, but if you go in with the goal of "finding faults" with the system, you are doing yourself a disservice. EDIT: wow, 15,000 posts? BC, That's good stuff. If you could just make it into smaller chunks. Think of breakfast cereal. Make it bite size. And Windows is not everything. List of operating systems Many OS in current use do not have much of a GUI. But they do usefull work in Banks, Dispatch, Government, Hospitals, Laudromats, ans so on. Quote from: Geek-9pm on October 18, 2011, 12:18:51 AM And Windows is not everything.It is when you are talking about modern games. it's either windows, or a console. Quote from: BC_Programmer on October 18, 2011, 12:32:34 AM It is when you are talking about modern games. it's either windows, or a console.Right. The game makes have a clear objective. Making money. Only a few games survive as free software. The cost to the PC manufacture is maybe between $40 to $80 for the Microsoft Windows 7 OS. If the manufacture could do it better, they would. If selling WINE to kids was legal, they would brew it. There is not good reason to make a 'Super Wine' emulator. Anybody can now buy a factory refurbished PC with Windows 7 64 bit and 2 GB of memory for about $250. That is a one-time investment. The games and hardware upgrades son eclipse the cost of the Microsoft OS. Expect Windows 7 to be around for seven years more or less. The games will get boring before that. I agree with you BC. If I could find a flaw in you dissertation, I would say so. For gaming, you have to go windows. I ran into the argument years ago when I was tying to get people to go with Linux. The gamers knew better even back then. Quote from: BC_Programmer on October 17, 2011, 08:36:52 PM Why do people get it in their head that Linux is the only free alternative? What about ReactOS You cannot be serious. Quote from: Rob Pomeroy on October 18, 2011, 04:39:32 AM
ReactOS isn't an alternative? It isn't free? Pretty sure it is both of those.Incorrect on point one - it is not a viable alternative at this stage. It's barely alpha. Quote from: Rob Pomeroy on October 18, 2011, 06:13:08 AM Incorrect on point one - it is not a viable alternative at this stage. It's barely alpha.viable:Capable of working successfully software being in alpha or early development has no direct bearing on it's viability. viability would depend on the task for which it needs to work successfully. ReactOS works fine for web browsing, word processing, E-mail, youtube videos/flash, winamp, even photoshop (although not CS5), which cover a wide assortment of tasks and for many people would be just fine. Of course, if they have a computer they already have an Operating System that can perform those tasks and there is very little reason outside philosophical waxings to switch to another. surprisingly Wireless in general seems to work ok as long as you have a Windows Driver for it, which was a surprise for me since no distro I tried a mere 2 years ago on my laptop was able to use it's Wireless adapter. Of course it doesn't come with a Internet Browser, but that should hardly impact it's viability (since you can install Firefox just fine). Quote ReactOS is an open source computer operating system intended to be binary compatible with application software and device drivers made for Microsoft Windows NT versions 5.x and up (Windows 2000 and its successors). A spin-off of a previous attempt to clone Windows 95, development started in early 1998, and has continued with the incremental addition of features already found in Windows.Quote from: BC_Programmer on October 18, 2011, 06:44:34 AM viable:Capable of working successfully Look before you go all pedantic on me, consider the difference between "viable" and "viable alternative". ReactOS by its own admission has such a long list of deficiencies that it is not a viable alternative to Windows for the majority of real-world cases. That's not to say it isn't viable (meaning that it's got a future) and that's not to deny the great work the ReactOS team has been doing. I've been watching and appreciating their slow progress for many years. But any person expecting to be able to switch to ReactOS as an alternative to Linux or Windows is going to be quite disappointed. Alpha software is very very rarely going to be a reasonable alternative to production software. Once ReactOS has got to the stage that Linux was say, 10 years ago, I for one will be cheering from the wings.ReactOS Compatibility: SimCity 3000 Unlimited 1.0 Microsoft Security Essentials 32-bit for XP Media Player Classic (several versions) Explorer++ 1.3.2 Opera (several versions) OpenOffice.org (several versions) SoftMaker Office 2006 WordPerfect Office (several versions) WorksSuite ( Microsoft) The above list is more that enough for many educational, light industry and home use. Anybody on a limit budget and many users would would choose or prefer prefer using older software on a free OS. The cost and learning curve issues can make a big difference in some applications. No one is saying the it has to be mainstream desktop. Has the OP used both WINE and ReactOS recently with older, cheaper Windows applications? |
|
120. |
Solve : setting up a chart? |
Answer» what is the syntax to creating columns IE.. name time dayWe need more information from you than that.that was an awful question on my part. I am setting up a chart of the number of users logged in that was an awful question on my part. I am setting up a chart of the number of users logged inWhat application are you using? Is this a spreadsheet in OpenOffice, or what? |
|
121. |
Solve : How to send email attachments using Unix.? |
Answer» I have a script that sends multiple files as attachments. When the user receives the email, the attachments are showing but when they try to open any attachment the file is empty... Any ideas? cp $EMAIL_FILE s: UNIX has no concept of an S: drive. Where are you trying to copy this file?According to my system architect guy, the email server for this type of application is configured on the server S: drive... Quote from: Jkeri on November 16, 2011, 08:08:31 AM According to my system architect guy, the email server for this type of application is configured on the server S: drive... As Rob notes, though, *nix doesn't use drive letters. Quote from: Jkeri on November 16, 2011, 08:08:31 AM According to my system architect guy, the email server for this type of application is configured on the server S: drive... Possibly you need to use Samba to ACCESS the S: drive on a different server? |
|
122. |
Solve : Need help with SMTPMAIL command? |
Answer» I want to send an attachment along with the email. The script is sending the email but there is no attachment. I cant find any HELP for SMTPMAIL |
|
123. |
Solve : Beginner needs help getting a veriable from xml? |
Answer» Hello. I'm new to *ix and am trying to pull a variable or two from an xml document. The document is in the format: |
|
124. |
Solve : Unix Date Format Question? |
Answer» Modify date-month program to CONVERT the output from the command "date" to All these questions you have posted, they are school work assignments, right? We won't do your HOMEWORK for you. There are times that we HELP with homework, but we won't do it for you. |
|
125. |
Solve : un nesting files in folders in nautilus? |
Answer» I just bought a new MP3 player |
|
126. |
Solve : Unix Parent and child process Shell scripting? |
Answer» Write a parent process and CHILD process codes to satisfy the following conditions. |
|
127. |
Solve : Unix Shell scripting? |
Answer» Modify the code below so that it will process input file roster to create files for I deleted the other post which contained your personal information (including your phone number). I saw that; I got the IMPRESSION they were SPECIMEN data included in the school assignment he copied and pasted. Nobody RTFMs any more. |
|
128. |
Solve : Want to make a theme for Chrome OS (Alias OpenSuse)? |
Answer» I have Chrome OS, that is a distro of OpenSuse that I've downloaded. NOWADAYS, I WANT to MAKE my own theme for metacity, but can't understand how the files are DISPOSED between them (PNG files and resource files)... |
|
129. |
Solve : how to remove varible from a list? |
Answer» hey I am doing something LIKE following:
Solve teh problem of by using following : Code: [Select]var1=$(echo $var1 | sed "s/$var//") But still How can i select the random varible from the list Question is there. Please suggest.make an array of variable in list , FIND the index of that array . Do x=rand()%index to GENERATE the random number and with that random number go to the array element : array This will give you the random selection for each time. Thanks RG |
|
130. |
Solve : Howdo i combine 2 variables into a 3rd? |
Answer» Being NEW to UNIX, i want to combine 2 values into a 3RD value |
|
131. |
Solve : Open GL in ubuntu 10.10 not running right while using the spring engine? |
Answer» So I am attempting to run Open GL through ubuntu 10.10 and having trouble with it. I am using the spring engine to play certain games and I have had multiple problems. In the beginning, running the spring engine would cause spring to say GLX not found or something of that nature. After installing the libgl1-mesa, the game would not say GLX not found, hitting the start would do literally nothing though. Drivers for Linux are hard to find so I couldn't just update it. I did on the other hand run the application through the terminal so I could see the error. This is what I get when running the program: |
|
132. |
Solve : changing an OS on a Compaq Armada 1560m? |
Answer» I want to put UNIX BSD on it, but I can't access the BIOS and I can't boot from the CD drive. I want to put UNIX BSD on it From what I've read, the Compaq Armada 1560m is a laptop: Processor: Pentium MMX 166Mhz, 66Mhz FSB RAM: 16MB installed, 80MB Max (EDO RAM) HD: 2.1GB Video: 800x600 Passive Matrix, 2MB VRAM. OS Windows 95 With Internet Explorer 4 (is what it came with) It doesn't possess any network capabilities as is, so Transfusions suggestion is out. Regardless of what BSD variant you choose, I doubt you'll be able to run any desktop environment, so you'll be left with the shell, probably. Can't hurt to try X.org, I guess, but don't be too hopeful... FreeBSD system requirements can be found here. You would likely need the FreeBSD/pc98 distribution. -if the system still has the stock 16MB, it won't meet the requirements of 24MB of RAM. The only interface it SEEMS to have that you can work with to install it is the floppy drive. Also, the way to get into the BIOS is TYPICALLY F10 or F2 during startup. But, you need to have installed a piece of firmware called "ROMPAQ" or something in order to make changes to it. I cannot find any links to that software anywhere, myself. As for installing FreeBSD using floppies, be sure to set aside an afternoon. here is the FAQ. From what I gather, you have to download the "full" FreeBSD, and then it contains floppy images which you then transfer to floppies, and use to boot the system to which you are installing FreeBSD. I'm not sure what the procedure entails after that, if I had to guess I'd say it would be able to pull the rest of the data from the CD-ROM for installation (assuming the download is in fact a CD-ROM, that is). Good luck. I'm downloading the pc98 version of BSD 8.2. I hope it will work... Thanks, transfusion! Wait make sure your laptop REALLY has an ethernet port before you download the installer: http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/compaq-armada-1560-p/1707-3121_7-30578702.html "No Networking"I'm talking about an old one. Like, ~1999It isn't booting! Windows 7 (which burnt it) is definitely not great. And my Open-SUSE can't detect blank disks. Help MAY be appreciated for this. Quote from: maxum on December 16, 2011, 05:47:07 PM It isn't booting! The system can't boot from a CD. You said that yourself in an earlier post. You would need to use the floppy disk method.It booted properly with ReactOS (which stucks in the middle of the installation). Quote from: maxum on December 16, 2011, 08:29:52 PM It booted properly with ReactOS (which stucks in the middle of the installation). You do know that FreeBSD's CD images aren't bootable, right? You need to use a floppy or USB drive to start sysinstall, as far as I'm aware.So I have to wait to Christmas so I would get a floppy drive? Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 16, 2011, 08:38:44 PM You do know that FreeBSD's CD images aren't bootable, right? You need to use a floppy or USB drive to start sysinstall, as far as I'm aware.Didn't know.Reading the FAQ more, it seems the disc is bootable. Of course since you said before you couldn't boot from the CD-ROM drive since you couldn't get into the BIOS... What happens when you try to boot from it? Where are my pliers?When a bootable cd is in the computer, it is asking wether I want to boot from the cd drive or not. Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 16, 2011, 08:38:44 PM You do know that FreeBSD's CD images aren't bootable, right? You need to use a floppy or USB drive to start sysinstall, as far as I'm aware.So, why is the extension .ISO? Quote from: maxum on December 30, 2011, 07:09:59 PM When a bootable cd is in the computer, it is asking wether I want to boot from the cd drive or not.And... why can't you? Quote So, why is the extension .ISO?Because it is a disc image. the .ISO extension is a disc image, it makes no provision that said disc will be bootable.Because I've first tried to boot with the normal FreeBSD 7.4 (which doesn't boot on this computer), so I was fooled up. Next, I've booted with a ReactOS CD and it worked. Anyway... I've got a USB floppy drive, so from now on, I can write on floppies. |
|
133. |
Solve : Google Chrome giving segmentation fault in Ubuntu 10.10? |
Answer» GOOGLE Chrome used to work fine on my computer without a problem. Now, whenever I run it, it gives me this: $ /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome %U --2011-11-13 14:24:53-- https://clients2.google.com/cr/report Resolving clients2.google.com... 74.125.115.100, 74.125.115.139, 74.125.115.101, ... Connecting to clients2.google.com|74.125.115.100|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: unspecified [text/html] Saving to: `/dev/fd/3' [ <=> ] 16 --.-K/s in 0s 2011-11-13 14:24:55 (288 KB/s) - `/dev/fd/3' saved [16] Crash dump id: 7139a7523938a339 Segmentation fault $ Help would be greatly appreciated!! Computer specs: Pentium 4 processor running Ubuntu 10.10 at 2.53 Ghz 748 MB or RAM 127.3 GB or hardrive space about 38 GB used If you need any other information, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again!What version of Chrome are you using?It SEEMS to me that Chrome attempts to perform an update, but fails. You are currently using Ubuntu 10.10; Ubuntu 11.10 is out already, you are two versions behind. Why don't you perform an upgrade to the latest Ubuntu release first?I have the most stable version of Google Chrome that there is right now. I haven't switched to 11.10 since I'm not that enthusiastic about the Unity LAYOUT. I personally like the Gnome interface and haven't used Unity. Is there an option in 11.10 that allows you to switch to the Gnome interface? Because if there is, I would probably switch. Quote from: Roguebantha on November 21, 2011, 12:47:51 PM I have the most stable version of Google Chrome that there is right now. I haven't switched to 11.10 since I'm not that enthusiastic about the Unity layout. I personally like the Gnome interface and haven't used Unity. Is there an option in 11.10 that allows you to switch to the Gnome interface? Because if there is, I would probably switch.Hello, have you ever considered using KDE or XFCE as your main desktop environment? These are available with kUbuntu and xUbuntu. You can download a live cd, try it and see if you feel comfortable with these DEs. Also, I have to tell you that Unity is based on GNOME, but it looks a lot different Do you think that 11.10 will FIX my problem? |
|
134. |
Solve : How do I download using Linux?? |
Answer» I tried to download Yahoo Messenger 11, Avast Antivirus, Malwarebytes, but this is what comes up. I tried to download Yahoo Messenger 11, Avast Antivirus, Malwarebytes, but this is what comes up. Are you trying to get those programs to run on your Linux computer? Why? I mean... why would you need that STUFF? What distro are you using?Try MAKING sure you download the LINUX version (if there is one) of any program you want to run. You cannot expect Windows programs to run seamlessly (or at all) on Linux, or vice versa. Quote from: Rob Pomeroy on October 20, 2011, 07:13:52 AM You cannot expect Windows programs to run seamlessly (or at all) on Linux, or vice versa. I'd go so far as to say that if you are trying to run any windows program on Linux at all (and FEEL there is no "alternative"), it might be a good time to reevaluate why you are using Linux.Here is a good place to start. http://lifehacker.com/5590624/lifehacker-pack-for-linux-our-list-of-the-best-linux-downloads Quote from: BC_Programmer on October 20, 2011, 01:15:47 PM I'd go so far as to say that if you are trying to run any windows program on Linux at all (and feel there is no "alternative"), it might be a good time to reevaluate why you are using Linux. Good call, but possibly a user at this level is not attempting a paradigm shift... Quote Avast Antivirus, Malwarebytes, but this is what comes up. You don't use that on Linux. That's part of the reasons for using Linux. Quote from: Linux711 on October 26, 2011, 07:34:41 AM You don't use that on Linux. That's part of the reasons for using Linux. That's hardly a reason to use Linux. It's just FUD to try to get people to use it. Quote That's hardly a reason to use Linux. It's just FUD to try to get people to use it. It's not FUD. You don't need that software on Linux because windows malware doesn't work on Linux. That's not FUD, that's a fact. Quote from: Linux711 on October 26, 2011, 08:04:16 AM It's not FUD. You don't need that software on Linux because windows malware doesn't work on Linux. That's not FUD, that's a fact. No. Linux malware works on Linux. There has not yet been a widespread Linux malware threat of the type that Microsoft Windows software faces; this is commonly attributed to the malware's lack of root access and fast updates to most Linux vulnerabilities. The number of malicious programs — including viruses, Trojans, and other threats — specifically written for Linux has been on the increase in recent years. Linux fans frequently deride Windows as being malware-ridden, while claiming their favorite operating system is free from such threats. That simply isn't true. Linux users who believe they can't be infected by malware are simply wrong. Quote No. Linux malware works on Linux. Did I say it didn't? I said windows malware won't and the MAJORITY of malware is written for windows. Quote from: Linux711 on October 26, 2011, 01:37:15 PM Did I say it didn't? I said windows malware won't and the majority of malware is written for windows. So are you saying that statistically a Linux MACHINE is safer? Yes. It is not safer by design, but because it is less popular. Quote from: Linux711 on October 26, 2011, 01:48:03 PM Yes. It is not safer by design, but because it is less popular.That's a good point, but I doubt that this is the main reason that Linux is safer than Windows. Quote from: nickgr5 on October 26, 2011, 03:57:38 PM but I doubt that this is the main reason that Linux is safer than Windows. Because it's not. And using the word "safer" is an ambiguous weasel word that takes on any number of definitions to serve the purposes of the person making the claim. Portable goalposts, really. |
|
135. |
Solve : WINE? |
Answer» When I try to open some windows programs in ubuntu by using wine, This message comes in terminal..."wine:install windows version of Mono to run .net executables" what should i do?? please help me... Quote from: shimnas on January 01, 2012, 11:32:26 PM When I try to open some windows programs in ubuntu by using wine, This message comes in terminal..."wine:install windows version of Mono to run .net executables" what should i do?? please help me... Don't run those programs in WINE because they aren't Windows programs, but rather .NET programs. Make sure you have Mono installed, though. I THINK they removed Mono from the latest version because of some VOCAL extremists who apparently think .NET is evil or something. If you have it installed, you can (try) to run .NET applications by running Mono program.exe via the terminal. I say try because outside trivial applications, .NET applications have to be written with the expectation that they will be run on Mono as well as the Windows CLR. Either that, or you could install the Windows Version of Mono, but that would be a bit weird, SINCE then you are going through two layers of INDIRECTION; first you have the Windows build of Mono running through WINE, and then you have the .NET application running through the windows build of mono. And generally speaking you aren't going to get much more compatibility out of Mono by running the Windows version. |
|
136. |
Solve : UNIX QUESTION? |
Answer» $more TEL grep "^$1" <<-END This is you phone book? His HOMEWORK Quote from: Salmon TROUT on November 30, 2011, 12:17:27 AM His homeworkPlease, do SAY it if it is. |
|
137. |
Solve : Best Linux of 2011. -What?? |
Answer» Quote The best Linux distro of 2011! How can that be! Do you agree? Who even cares? Just because something is popular it does not make it best. Wow. that is immensely stupid. EDIT: let me explain. The problem, I see, with many Linux distributions is that they are constantly comparing themselves with one another "we have feature X like distro Y" type stuff. That's the wrong way to go about it. Consider the people who use the distribution as if they were "customers"; and really, they are; they are spending their time on your product. In that sense, you should be listening to your customers, not to your competitors. If a customer wants Feature X like it exists in distro Y, they will let you know. If they don't, you'll have saved yourself development time to spend on the things they do want. Also, a lot of Linux distributions seem to be in the same wide market of being a "general purpose desktop". But how many try to forge a niche? Forging a niche that is designed for what about 10% of users wants means you'll end up getting that 10%, and your competitors fight over the remaining 90%. For example; Chrome OS is basically a niche distribution, it is a relatively limited environment designed specifically for web access. Google learned this by looking at it's prospective customers, and what they needed, and only then comparing those needs with what was available. They attempted to corner it. the constant complaints about Chrome OS not being a good environment for a desktop- they are true, but they miss the point. It's not supposed to be a replacement for your standard Windows, Linux, or OSX desktop- it's cornering a SMALL market segment, and the fact is that the people complaining about it do not matter because they aren't part of it. Software is about what your customers want, not what your competitors give.For me, there's no "best distribution". Each one has it's advantages and drawbacks. The good thing about Linux is that there's the ability to choose, so that I can select the distribution which best suits me. Anyways, we should start thinking like we are part of the same community, no matter which distribution we are using; then we will understand that every distro is to be respected.Anyway, only developers/programmers can find themselves in a Linux system. It is too complicated! Compare the number of file of any Linux system with any Windows os. Linux have like ~ 2000 files and windows have ~ 300 files. And Linux software is hard to find. If you're not a software specialist, take Windows or Mac. Quote from: maxum on November 19, 2011, 05:12:20 PM Anyway, only developers/programmers can find themselves in a Linux system. It is too complicated! Oh really? My parents are in their 60s and their computer runs Linux. They had never had a computer before about two years ago. They asked me if I could give them one for emails and to pay their bills online. I deliberately gave them a computer with Linux so I didn't have to go over there every other week to remove viruses. They had never really used Windows before, so they didn't know the difference. Once they learned how to use their computer, they got along just fine with it. Don't get me wrong, I still get calls from them asking how to do this or that, but they took to it very EASILY. So, it's not just for programmers, it can also be for retirees with no prior experience using computers. Quote And Linux software is hard to find.I disagree. By using repositories, they've made it very easy to find software, easier than windows by far. Quote from: maxum on November 19, 2011, 05:12:20 PM Compare the number of file of any Linux system with any WindowsThis is downright wrong. My Windows folder on this computer has 102,467 files. A somewhat clean install of XP has around 4 thousand or so files in the windows folder; and that isn't counting the other folders it makes, for user profiles and whatnot. The number of files a system happens to contain isn't really relevant to how easy or difficult it is to use. After all, if that was the case, the easiest computer to use would be one with nothing on it at all. Quote And Linux software is hard to find.That's just silly. It's all right there in the Package Manager. The downside being that the VERSIONS in the package manager are often far behind the latest versions. But there is a package manager. What I think confuses people is that most Linux programs have to be distributed as source, and I have to agree that ./make install, ./configure, ./make are a bit less user-friendly than just having an installer program (which appears to be somewhat atypical when it comes to Linux applications outside package managers, of which there are almost as many flavours as their are distros.) Quote If you're not a software specialist, take Windows or Mac.That is just silly. People use Linux if it fits their needs. The nlink below is usefull. And les polemic. And more logical. Linux Distributions: How to Choose One Quote Red Hat Linux has been around for a while and has acquired a reputation for consistency and reliability. It may not be the easiest to use or the most cutting-edge distribution, but it provides the type of high-quality support that is valued by companies, which made it the de-facto standard in corporate America. Quote Knoppix provides an excellent run-from-CD solution, with its powerful hardware detection features and pain-free set-up. If desired, the system can be optionally installed on the hard disk to improve performance. It also comes with plenty of software. ~~Close my foodtrap next time~~I prefer Knoppix myself http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html Quote from: kimsland on November 28, 2011, 06:01:40 PM I prefer Knoppix myself http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html Isn't Knoppix mainly just meant to be used as a live CD though? Have you installed it on your hard drive?Once for about an hour or so. Ended up removing it and sticking to the 'LiveCD' Subject was 'Best Linux', hope that included BootCDs as well. Quote from: kimsland on November 28, 2011, 06:30:03 PM Subject was 'Best Linux', hope that included BootCDs as well. Sure. I guess those count. Why do you prefer Knopixx over other live CDs?I actually created my own personal one. It has the Boot part and a Windows gui menu part (for autorun inside Windows) It took me months to make! peeerfectly. But if I suggest to users to download a BootCd I always recommend, easy to use, knoppix.I'm using Open SUSE. What I was SAYING lately is: 1- A bad file number evaluation. 2- Difficulties getting started with it, since I was an MS-DOS user. Quote from: maxum on December 10, 2011, 07:56:08 PM What I was saying lately is:What does this mean? (if it's about the number of files in the Operating System, that's a moot point since it both doesn't matter and is hardly inconsistent with other Operating Systems) |
|
138. |
Solve : Building an Arduino board? |
Answer» Arduino is open source, so I think it would be better to post in this section: So, I was thinking about building my own Arduino. I think I'm going to save some money If I don't buy a pre-built Arduino, and I'm also going to enjoy constructing it. I've seen a few videos on Youtube on how to build the PCB board, but I would like some more info before going to try it out. What should I do first? What about selecting good materials to work with (like capacitors, LEDs, ETC.)? What would you recommend? Anyone experienced on this? Thank you in advance.Arduino board is an open source USB audio card. See if somebody already has the PCB ready to build. Doing your own PCB is a big drain on your time. Been there. Buy your parts from a new parts dealer. Avoid the surplus dealers. The price is almost the same For International customers, Jameco in California is among the best. www.jameco.com Digi-Key is good. www.digikey.com Locally, you can find regional stores in your area. But do not buy parts from Radio Shack. Except batteries. And Newark is good. Did you know they have the board ready to go for about $25 on-line? http://www.newark.com/jsp/search/productdetail.jsp?SKU=13T9285&CMP=AFC-GB100000001 Quote from: Geek-9pm on December 10, 2011, 02:39:55 PM Arduino board is an open source USB audio card. Not even closeThanks people. Well yeah, it's not an audio card, but anyway. Would you also recommend buying parts from eBay? There are many sellers (with positive feedback) who offer parts and they also look very cheap, but I'm not sure about the quality. Quote from: nickgr5 on December 11, 2011, 06:00:15 PM Would you also recommend buying parts from eBay? There are many sellers (with positive feedback) who offer parts and they also look very cheap, but I'm not sure about the quality. It probably depends on the level of support you require. I imagine if you're doing a fairly detailed PROJECT, having someone geeky to talk to at Maplin/wherever would be a big plus.No, I would not recommend buying parts from eBay. Unless the vendor has a very good reputation and has added value to the purchase such as addition instructions and hand holding. Arduino - HomePage http://www.arduino.cc/ It is a micro controller suitable for telemetry and automation. It could be used for running your model train set. Or controlling the air conditioning units in HOTEL rooms. Or almost any task thing that needs full automation. The gadget sells for $25 and is a good introduction to micro controllers if you want to build it yourself. And it is not and Audio device. I have no idea why I said that. I am STILL thinking of some lame reason and can't find any. If you find an active forum for it, let us know. Or enter it in the CH you-brew computer club. It qualifies and a home-built computer. If you NEED some free help with machine code, come back here. CH has some of the world's best low-down programmers. Got my answer, thanks a bunch. I'm marking this as solved. It would be a good experience to at least attempt to build your own. |
|
139. |
Solve : Help with awk and sed? |
Answer» Beginner here. Trying to get certain lines from an xml file to print with awk and/or sed and I need help. |
|
140. |
Solve : Ubuntu 7.04? |
Answer» Hello everyone, I just need help on how to run my Ubuntu 7.04 CD in my Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.
I tried the first instruction but gets me in something like a command WINDOW and there's no any GUI. My system is currently in Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit and Athlon 64 X2. Any advise will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance.Did you have the same computer in 2006? Lots of things change in six years. The first tithing to try is a newer version of Ubuntu. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (PRECISE Pangolin) Daily Build Quote PC (Intel x86) alternate install CDNote that you have to burn it to a DVD, not a CD.Yah, you're correct. Lots of things change in six years. I think I know now the problem, my current system is in a 64-bit processor. I'll give it a try. Thanks man! I'm confused now. I choose 64-bit PC (AMD64) alternate install CD and burned it (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin) Daily Build) already in DVD. I boot it up but not quite sure if I'm doing the correct steps. Can't find it also in their website. I found a Wubi installer. This a different way to install Ubuntu. But the problem is I need to re-download again Ubuntu. My goal is: I want to run this Ubuntu DVD without flushing/erasing my current OS Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit. What's the next step?First you boot then regular x86 distro in the 'live' or 'demo' mode. Yes, you can also install Ubuntu inside windows. For many users this is the best trad-off. Does not require changing the Windows 7 partition. Do not use the version intended for the MAC PC. You have a AMD machine. You do NOT have a Athlon64, Opteron, EM64T Xeon. If you still have problems, come back here. Sorry, I don't UNDERSTAND this: Quote First you boot then regular x86 distro in the 'live' or 'demo' mode. I boot up my Ubuntu DVD again but I'm stuck-up in the partitioning method.
If I choose #1, then I don't know what's the next step. If I choose #2, #3, or #4, all data on the disk will be erased. I don't know how to do manual. (Sorry I'm newbie in Linux)Did you grab the latest version of Ubuntu yet? How did you partition your harddrive under Windows and is it a SATA drive? Quote from: Raptor on January 15, 2012, 05:48:34 AM Did you grab the latest version of Ubuntu yet?Yes. Got it here: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin) Daily Build Quote from: Raptor on January 15, 2012, 05:48:34 AM How did you partition your harddrive under Windows and is it a SATA drive?1 Hard drive partitioned to 3 1st is the System Reserved 2nd is the Local Disc (C:) 3rd is for data (E:)Okay, if you choose option 1 everything on that partition (E: under Windows) will be erased and repartitioned to suit the needs of Linux. Your bootloader will also be changed to GRUB. Windows should remain and you'll be able to boot from by choosing it from the list that is shown before the OS loads. The other options will erase everything. Except for manual, which allows you to partition the disk yourself. Neither are recommended. If you have no experience with Linux I think you should play it safe and either use a separate hard drive or a different computer if your Windows installation is important to you. For those new to using GNU plus Linux systems, here are best recommendations: 1 . Use only the "live" OS from the DVD. It works very good. OR 2. Use the Linux bistro inside a Windows folder, no change to partitions. http://ubuntumanual.org/posts/152/how-to-install-ubuntu-inside-windows OR 3. Just install on a secondary drive. First disable the primary drive. Then later r BIOS to switch system. Very simple. Works perfectly. Linux does great even on an old 40 GB PATA drive. edit: Can not find a guide to 12, here is a 11,10 guide: http://ubuntumanual.org/guides/435/how-to-install-ubuntu-11-10-oneric-ocelot-an-ubuntu-installation-guide Quote from: Geek-9pm on January 15, 2012, 01:47:41 PM For those new to using GNU plus Linux systems,Nobody of importance actually calls it GNU/Linux. And there are very good reasons why. Quote from: geek hoodlum on January 15, 2012, 06:14:43 AM Yes. Got it here: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Precise Pangolin) Daily Build That's still a beta. It's still in development. You should get 11.10 or 11.04. Quote from: geek hoodlum on January 14, 2012, 09:05:06 PM My goal is: I want to run this Ubuntu DVD without flushing/erasing my current OS Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit. The best way to do that would be to run it in a virtual machine. I use VirtualBox. If you still want to partition your hard drive, that's fine. Go here: http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download Under step 4, click on Show me how. Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 15, 2012, 03:44:13 PM Nobody of importance actually calls it GNU/Linux. And there are very good reasons why.Yes, I am nobody of importance. So I can call it GNU + Linux all day long and ignore the reasons for why not. Quote from: Geek-9pm on January 15, 2012, 10:03:18 PM Yes, I am nobody of importance. So I can call it GNU + Linux all day long and ignore the reasons for why not. GNU was the ascribed name given by the FSF to their as-of-yet unfinished project to create a "free Unix"; The core components of that described OS at the time were a kernel, a basic text editor, a command shell, and a C compiler. These came in the form of Ed, BASH, and GCC. However, the kernel, known as HURD, has not yet materialized. Or maybe it has. Just not in a functional form. Even if we account for the many other things the GNU project contributes to most Linux distributions, (and there are a lot); the sum of all those parts is not made up of only the Linux Kernel and those GNU components; there are significant pieces shipped with almost any Linux distro that have nothing to do with the GNU project. Some of them aren't even licensed under the FSFs preferred licenses(the horror). The big one being X11, which isn't from GNU nor is it GPL; the Qt framework isn't GNU and isn't GPL and is included and used quite a lot within Linux. Many of the portions used in most linux distributions in fact use BSD-licensed products, such as the init daemon; Should we now call it GNU/Linux/BSD? Even the FSF page on the subject pulls statistics and can only come up with the stat that GNU code contributes 15% of the total size of most distributions. Truly, this is nothing but absurd narcissism. 15% of the codebase is a minority. The entire purpose of free software is that the best parts to do a specific task are used, re-used, modified, pass around and compiled into various usable operating system distributions for various purposes; or not. It's software. It's out there if someone wants it- many other packages are included in a distribution like Mint or Fedora, and most of them are essential in delivering the USER Experience. To Trivialize all of the other excellent software that goes into a complete Operating System like Fedora Core, Debian, or Ubuntu should be defined by what the GNU project claims is the largest single contributor is nothing but arrogance. The largest contributor is not GNU. It's the community. Nice rant, BC. Back to topic. I failed to mention how one does install Ubuntu inside of Windows. My bad. Sorry. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WubiGuide WubiGuide Introduction http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/virtualbox Installing Ubuntu inside Windows using VirtualBox |
|
141. |
Solve : Installation of drivers? |
Answer» I GOT an Asus PCI xpress 1X network CARD. I can't get the Ubuntu 10.04 to RECOGNIZE the card. Can anyone tell me how to INSTALL the drivers and get Ubuntu 10.04 to recognize the card? |
|
142. |
Solve : Need Help with Ubuntu? |
Answer» Posts: 1 Experience: Beginner OS: Unknown Hello, I was going through my system (though I dont KNOW Ubuntu very well) and deleted the daemon file, thinking I would be able to reinstall it. Now, my screen goes into a Dos Mode look alike, essentially the BSOD and I can't get it to load the normal window. Can anyone PLEASE assist me? THANK you all so MUCH. I deleted your other post. Please do not post the same question more than once. Thank you.Hold down the Shift key as the computer is starting. This will bring up the Grub boot MENU. At that menu select Recovery Mode. In Recovery Mode choose Repair Broken Packages. Thank you so much for the advice. However, it did not solve the problem. I am concerned that I won't be able to reinstall any of what I deleted. Basically what happened was, the computer's sound suddenly didn't work. Not on loading, no music, nothing. I went through the system uninstalling certain sound packages hoping it might help and then reinstall them. In the process I accidentally uninstalled the graphics card (I think) and now it's only in the dos mode-type screen and won't go to anything else. What happens when you type startx at the dos mode-type screen? |
|
143. |
Solve : Simple shell script? |
Answer» Hello, |
|
144. |
Solve : Belarc? |
Answer» Looking for something LIKE this to use with Linux.lsusb, lspci? HardinfoIn the olden days, we used a torch, a screwdriver and a spiral-bound NOTEPAD... Quote from: Rob Pomeroy on January 17, 2012, 04:15:17 AM In the olden days, we used a torch, a screwdriver and a spiral-bound notepad... And that was a LONG time AGO! |
|
145. |
Solve : Linux distro for old computers? |
Answer» hi i have a IBM Thinkpad 600 and tried alot of linux distros and they all dont work |
|
146. |
Solve : OS for Beowulf Compute Cluster? |
Answer» I am currently building a SMALLER beowulf cluster (smaller than 16 nodes) and need help ditirmining a operating system for the main node. A Beowulf cluster is a computer cluster of what are normally identical, commodity-grade computers networked into a small local area network with libraries and programs installed which allow processing to be shared ...You likely already know all that. Just put it here for others to know what you are talking about. Some of the material on the topic is kind of old.I am curious. I found Fedora Linux, and was wondering if this version of linux would be suitable for beowulfing. You may as well go ahead and make the leap to Unix. http://www.freebsd.org/ You know you want to... Here's a quick run-down on it: http://alhabsi.net/freebsd/beowulf.xml If you still really want to run Linux, ALMOST all of the distros you find will be fairly similar. If you want to go with fedora, go ahead. There's a quick explanation of how to set it up here: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Beowulf-HOWTO/ |
|
147. |
Solve : An odd output for the terminal upon installing file: rewriting boot img??? |
Answer» My computer just recently came up with an update to the mesa GL program. This was not odd except that the button to select it was grayed out, which did not allow me to select it for upgrade. I then went to the terminal WINDOW to install it manually. (possibly my first mistake) This is the output it gave me: |
|
148. |
Solve : Ubuntu 64 bit istallation fail? |
Answer» I know that this is a similar title to an earlier post, but is a different problem. i am wondering why it would not work for one computer but for the other Bad drive. or combination of disk + drive I tried cleaning just the disk, but now, after a short while after the computer boots, it just automatically turns off. Not sure if it is just my hardware or something, but i did not touch the internals at all yet [EDIT] NevermindI tried the cleaning, and now the disk managed to instal linex without any errors. Howeber, when it re-booted the system, it is taking a much longer time than what would be expected from myself to finally log it, but the screen stays at the login standad background. With a mouse, and that is all. What would i do next? New information I have sucessfully booted into recovery mode, and i can do it reliably, however, i wish to know what is preventing me from booting normally. I did a full update, with all the files the update manager gave to me, and also installed the driver for my wireless card. Any ideas? Have you tried logging in?The computer works just fine from recovery mode, logging in, getting on internet, installing drivers, ext. A few features i noticed are not working right, like the double monitors is not working for me in recovery. Sorry - I mean, when you boot normally (not recovery mode), have you tried logging in?Lately, it has just been getting stuck at the ubuntu loading image. But when i could log in on normal, it would leave me at a blank desktop image, and a mouse. No icons, taskbar, application dock, nothing. Quote from: zeroburn on February 08, 2012, 08:13:28 AM when i could log in on normal, it would leave me at a blank desktop image, and a mouse. Probably the simplest way around that would be to create a new USER profile - or did you try that already?Wow. DERP on my part. Like, mega DERP. Thanks for the help, as it seems to be working thus far Cool. |
|
149. |
Solve : How to specify IP address for remote desktop? |
Answer» I need to find my remote desktop IP but I have been unable to do this since all I can find is my router IP and my 192.168 address. How do I specify this so that I can, for example, access it from a computer not on the LAN?You fill out your WAN address in a remote desktop client and if necessary the port number the remote server is listening on (on your network) and your router does the rest. |
|
150. |
Solve : Shared Printers and Hard Disks Ubunto 11.10? |
Answer» Hello all. I am PRETTY new to the scene of Ubuntu and linex. I have learned much about the systems from using the OS as my MAIN operating system, but i still have some questions. |
|