1.

Solve : Epic Fail of an over-the-top installation, please help me?

Answer»

Ok, well

I received an old school laptop(Toshiba Satellite Pro 4300 series) from a technology giveaway during this summer, and after playing with it for a while, decided that I'd like to be able to go online with it. So, I went and bought a Linksys wireless G networking card. It said on the box that I needed to have Windows 98SE to run it. I had an old computer in my room that had a fried hard drive, and it CAME with a Windows 98SE disc. Lucky me. So I looked up how to do a over-the-top installation of the new operating system. It said to rename win.com to win.old, and so I did that. It didn't work, so I renamed win.ini to win.old. When I restarted my computer it came up with the message "EMM386 has DETECTED error #à9 in an application at memory address 08CC:02EC. To minimize the chance of data loss, EMM386 has halted your computer. For more information, consult your documentation. To restart your computer, press ENTER."

I don't have the documentation, because the school never included it with the computer. Is there anything that I can do to save the computer, and update it to Windows 98SE?

Why don't you boot from 98 CD, or a bootdisk (floppy), format the drive, and install fresh copy of 98?Are you sure the laptop sports a 32bit PCMCIA slot?

Why do you want to go online with Windows 98SE? It is nearly impossible to secure given that there are almost no more programs being written for it. That and Microsoft is no longer releasing updates for it.

You might want to obtain Windows 2000 instead. you should never ever rename com files because there files for ms dos to run a comand so that means if you rename com files dos wont work properly, i just want to warn not to rename com extentons unless you know what your doingQuote from: tylerisdabest on December 25, 2008, 11:58:48 PM

you should never ever rename com files because there files for ms dos to run a comand so that means if you rename com files dos wont work properly, i just want to warn not to rename com extentons unless you know what your doing

com files are programs without an EXE header.

renaming them just prevents them from running; loss of functionality is limited to thoes commands renamed. which begs the question-

What are the specs of the machine? Installed RAM, etc..

where were you told to rename win.com? This doesn't make any sense- I don't see what productive result could come of it. If the OS disk is a OEM install disk (needs a blank drive) then format the drive and boot from the CD.Actually this is the correct method for doing a Repair Install of Win98 and SE...
I used it successfully for Years.
It also retains all old settings and installed apps....

win.ini however should NOT have been touched for this procedure.Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 26, 2008, 04:13:05 AM
where were you told to rename win.com?

Oh, you youngsters! Ever hear of Google? This is absolutely standard practice if you want to do an over-the-top install of Win 9x family using a full install disk.

Quote
This doesn't make any sense

It makes plenty of sense. Win.com is one file that is always present in an existing Win 9x installation. The installer on the CD looks for it. If it finds it, an OEM disk tells you that you need an upgrade disk.

Quote
I don't see what productive result could come of it.

The productive result is that the installer doesn't find win.com, and assumes that it is OK to go ahead and copy the system files.

Since win.com is gone, it won't complain about being an upgrade and it will still use the existing registry and program files.

Quote
If the OS disk is a OEM install disk (needs a blank drive)

Win 9x OEM install disks don't need a "blank drive"; they merely need a FAT formatted volume without a copy of win.com.

An alternative to deleting or renaming win.com is to do this

Code: [Select]D:setup.exe /na3
where D:= your CD-ROM drive letter.

Quote
begs the question

It raises the question.



I got the contrex treatment! I am finally a real member of CH!

In any case- since this this laptop was acquired from a third party, would it not be best to attempt some form of clean install?


and secondly:


I should know these things, *censored* it. I've dealt with them before.Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 26, 2008, 12:02:04 PM
I got the contrex treatment! I am finally a real member of CH!

Indeed. Only a select few get the Contrex treatment. Quote from: Dias de verano on December 26, 2008, 12:26:26 PM
Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 26, 2008, 12:02:04 PM
I got the contrex treatment! I am finally a real member of CH!

Indeed. Only a select few get the Contrex treatment.

you'll also take special note that unlike many of our members I didn't take it personally, especially since I was dead WRONG. If I had reread or even thought about my post at all even I would have realized that; not an excuse, but it has been ages since I actively used the 9x line.Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 27, 2008, 08:38:17 AM
it has been ages since I actively used the 9x line.

I haven't since around 2001 when I ditched Win 98SE in favour of XP.ok, so it was more recent then that. No excuse for me!

2001... I didn't even own a computer and barely knew how to browse the web. How things change...


Discussion

No Comment Found