This section includes InterviewSolutions, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 11401. |
Solve : Cursor hijacked? |
|
Answer» I have had this problem for about the last two years, off and on. There is some sort of program working in the background of my computer and even THOUGH I have reformatted my hard drive, it still surfaces from time to time. |
|
| 11402. |
Solve : KEY BOARDS? |
|
Answer» Hi guys, |
|
| 11403. |
Solve : No boot after wireless card installation? |
|
Answer» This evening my sister in law called me with a computer problem. |
|
| 11404. |
Solve : Power on Security? |
|
Answer» I would like to prevent my laptop being powered up unless a certain usb flash DRIVE is connected - a power-on dongle. This sounds to me to be a simple security measure but i cant SEE any such thing advertised for sale.Because there isn't such a thing. The only way to prevent a COMPUTER from powering up is to physically disconnect the power (either at the power supply or at the motherboard). |
|
| 11405. |
Solve : Print too Small? |
|
Answer» I am having problems making the right adjustments to make my printer print in a larger size. The print is so small I need a magnifying glass to view the printed material. I have tried everything that I thought would adjust the print, but I must be missing something. I have a Lexmark, All in one, #8350. I did not have this problem before until recently. Thank you al for whatever assistance you may have on this situationWhat is it that you are tring to print?Make sure, correct PAPER size is selected.are you running windows vista??? what kind of printer?I am using Vista and the printer is a Lexmark - One in All.what is it that your attempting to print??? Quote from: Evitta on May 11, 2008, 11:00:37 AM I did not have this problem before until recently... Have you MADE any changes to your COMPUTER?Symptoms Small fonts printed regardless of FONT size selected Small Fonts Printed Regardless of Font Size Selected ID:208 To resolve this, try the following actions: Check the default fonts within Microsoft Windows. Select your entire document and set it to a larger font. Make sure all your fonts are loaded properly. Change the resolution to QUICK print at 600 dpi. To do so: Click Start, Settings, Printers. Right click the Lexmark printer icon and choose Properties. Choose the Document/Quality tab and set the resolution to 600 dpi quick print/draft. Change the Spool Data Format to RAW. To do this: Click Start, Settings, Printers. Right click the Lexmark printer icon and choose Properties. Select the Details tab and click Spool Settings. In the Spool Settings screen, set the Spool Data Format to RAW. Click OK and then Apply. Try out different settings for the parallel port in the BIOS. The BIOS of your computer is usually accessible when you boot up your PC, although you may be prompted to enter setup. Lexmark recommend ECP or some bi-directional mode for our printers.Important: You may need to refer to your PC manufacturer or technical support service for assistance. To rule out the printer driver as a source of the problem, download the latest version of the driver from our website, www.lexmark.com Also here is the updated Driver if that doesn't work. http://downloads.lexmark.com/cgi-perl/downloads.cgi?ccs=229:1:0:516:0:0&searchLang=en&os_group=Windows%20Vista&target=[/url] |
|
| 11406. |
Solve : Is it possible to copy VHS tapes to DVD using a stand alone TV tuner box?? |
|
Answer» Hello, Is it possible to COPY VHS tapes to DVD using a STAND ALONE TV tuner box? We have a DVD PLAYER but it does not record. Thank you for any help. Monica |
|
| 11407. |
Solve : Toshiba Satellite wont recognize CD/DVD Drive when booted? |
|
Answer» Hello, I'm not sure if this is a hardware problem or not, but since it involved my D:\ drive I figured it's the best place to start. |
|
| 11408. |
Solve : Non-responsive computer? |
|
Answer» I have a problem that I've not had before. My desktop monitor shows the screen that it would show if I had pressed the monitor button that controls the brightness, WIDTH, height, etc. of the screen. The desktop computer will not respond to ANYTHING, including keyboard, mouse, ctrl-alt-delete, etc. I TURNED the computer off and re-started it, and still no change. I turned off the power strip, waited a few minutes, turned everything back on, and still no change. The only thing working is my internet connection, and I know this because I can use the laptops in the house with the WIRELESS card. At this point, I can't use the desktop computer or the printer. |
|
| 11409. |
Solve : Computer Doesn't Boot? |
|
Answer» Hi, My best guess would be the power supply. Do you have access to one you could try? Make sure you clean the heat sink and apply new thermal paste before trying. Ditto. My thoughts exactly. |
|
| 11410. |
Solve : Radion X800 GTO hardware detection issue and possible motherboard issue? |
|
Answer» DiDisplay Devices |
|
| 11411. |
Solve : Formating a Drive over 128 Gigabytes? |
|
Answer» Quote from: squall_01 on May 13, 2008, 05:02:05 AM Unless you make it a dual boot, linux would change the format. This is completely untrue...GParted can read; write ; create and delete NTFS partitions without changing a thing. Please do your research BEFORE advising.Sorry PAT only BASING it off of what I understand an thats not a whole lot in the linux world.For anyone that cares I did it. No partitions with a really old version of XP. For some strange reason XP original can read a partition over 128 Gb but can't write one, however it still can't read a drive over 1 Tb so I have no idea what the maximum partition size it can read is. Did it the hard way, got ANOTHER Sata capable computer and formated it in windows. Thanks for all the help, although not practicaly helpful it did make me get off my backside and actually do something about it so indirectly helpful. |
|
| 11412. |
Solve : hard drive not found? |
|
Answer» my laptop got an error bad pool caller, i TRIED to re install my operating system came from recovery cd rom such as windows xp media edition but unfortunately i got this error upon setup which is no hard disk FOUND. it is a sata hard drive. i look at BIOS setup and found out that hard disk still detect by bios. then i use windows vista and fortunately no problem occur at all but my system RUN slower cause of system requirement. how can i install my original operating system without an error will occur? help me, THANKS and god blessWhat would possess you to ditch your old OS in favor of Vista in the first place?Jetz73 - Welcome to the CH forums. |
|
| 11413. |
Solve : SERIOUS laptop problem. Has anyone heard of this happening?!? |
|
Answer» I would be eternally grateful to anyone who can help me with this problem. |
|
| 11414. |
Solve : Keyboard Error - Not Keyboard - Mouse Freezes When Plug in Keyboard? |
|
Answer» I get a keyboard error message on boot up WHETHER it is plugged in or not. Once I plug in the keyboard the mouse freezes immediately and the keyboard still does not work. Then I can't do anything and have to restart. I have tried multiple keyboards, none work on this system but they all work on others. |
|
| 11415. |
Solve : Paging operations?? |
|
Answer» Quote An error was detected on device \Device\Harddisk0\D during a paging operation. I constantly get these in the event viewer under system... the more information thing it gives says I should replace the drive. But not having the money to do so right now, makes me ask if there could possibly be another WAY? Or REASON... Edit: Just got a BLUE screen... it said it was an "Invalid process attach attempt" I don't KNOW if that's linked to this...Find out the manuf. of the drive and DLoad and run their FREE diagnostics from their website....i fear you need a new drive. |
|
| 11416. |
Solve : Recording sound device not working? |
|
Answer» windows XP. Dimension Dell c521. 48 x cd-rw/dvd drive. |
|
| 11417. |
Solve : Hard Drive 20gb but PC says its only 2gb? |
|
Answer» I recently replaced the Hard drive in my daughters Compaq Presario 5080us....I started with a win98se full install..upgraded to Me..and finally to xp home..no problems up to there..when I went to install SP2 for xp I got the message there was not enough space on the Hard Drive well since I installed a 20gb as was the original and that was plenty big enough I checked the drive capacity in windows explorer and sure enough it SAID 2gb actually 1.99gb and it was just about full I took the drive out and checked the label just to be sure and it says 20gb. I checked the product thru Seagate (just in case the guy I bought it from switched the label, hey you never know) and it came back as a 20gb drive..there are 4 jumper position positions and I tried them all with the same result...the drive is a Seagate u series 5 20gb..somehow I don't think the brand or model matter and its probably a software issue..but since I'm not stupid enough to pay Microsoft $59.95 to answer questions about their own software.. and HP just has no clue..I need ideas on what else to do to GET the drive to know what the real numbers are... Thank You I recently replaced the Hard driveYou formatted it, before installing Windows, right? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/221829 Quote Before you install Windows 98 on an empty hard disk, you must first create a primary PARTITION and then format a file system on that partition. Each allocated space on the hard disk (primary partition or logical drive) is assigned a drive letter. Windows 98 supports the FAT16 and FAT32 file systems. When you run the Fdisk tool on a hard disk that is larger than 512 MB, you are prompted to choose a file system.Nope I didn't just put the disk in and away I went...I didn't even think about it..just figured hey its a new drive it comes already formatted ...what a dope..I have new made installs before but always on a used drive..always formatted it then..though I never did fdisk..I'm going to try reformat and fdisk today..I'll let you know how it goes...ThanksYou probably some how made a 2gb partiton even THOUGHT the drives are blank they dont come partitoned. Witch is probably why your only seeing that much.well I finally got it to work right...I formatted the drive..did fdisk..large drive support..3 times before I realized I already had a partition that needed to be deleted and repartitioned before it would work..just wanted to say thanks for all the help...I'm sure I'll be back in the future..lol Thanks you so much...Paul Good job Thanks for posting back. |
|
| 11418. |
Solve : video card install help? |
|
Answer» so i just installed my Geforce 8600 Gt and when i TURNED my computer on the monitor was black and could not detect my computer. I had the monitor hooked up to the graphics card and the FAN was running just the monitor DIDNT pick it up. plz help HELLO! |
|
| 11419. |
Solve : Having computer problem? |
|
Answer» The scroll to my mouse is acting as the "Back" and "Forward button. |
|
| 11420. |
Solve : What is a Jumper actually?? |
|
Answer» Quote from: PATIO on May 03, 2008, 08:40:24 AM Quote from: dahlarbear on May 03, 2008, 05:44:09 AMSorry Patio... I prefer Ivy's PICTURE. Yours is a little too ones and zeros for me. As I ALWAYS say ''Somethings need a womans touch'' |
|
| 11421. |
Solve : front panel audio output is not working? |
|
Answer» hi friends, |
|
| 11422. |
Solve : System restart button? |
|
Answer» My system does not get RESTART when i press the restart button , but could be the reasion for it . |
|
| 11423. |
Solve : buying a GPU? |
|
Answer» hi, im about to buy components for a new PC BUILD and i NEED help choosing a graphics card. |
|
| 11424. |
Solve : Need to do a Complete copy of Hard drive? |
|
Answer» My Primary hard drive's connectors are breaking. So, I NEED to copy everything to a second hard drive I have of the same size. It is external and brand new and I will be using eSata to do the copy. |
|
| 11425. |
Solve : 3 gig DDR 2 SDRAM Failure; 4 mod = 2 mod (1 gig) + 2 mod (512 mb).? |
|
Answer» Motherboard: HT2000 |
|
| 11426. |
Solve : Computer wont restart? |
|
Answer» I have a problem with a computer that wont reboot from windows xp. It wont completely shut off to "restart". I have to PUSH in the power button to turn it off so I can turn it back on. The computer will however "shutdown" when selected to do so in xp. Any ideas?When did this problem start? |
|
| 11427. |
Solve : canon pixma ip4300? |
|
Answer» I am USING windows XP with all the latest downloads. Have had printers before and this is the This not qualifies you for this: Code: [Select] Official Home PC users Certification. This User is a member of W A F U W A T We Are Feed Up With Advanced Technology Sorry if I offended you in asking the question about my printer but I found my answer from the company and do not have to bother anyone on this forum anymore. Thanks anywayNo, Thanks for sharing with us. If Cannon helped you after that warrenty, that is good news! When it comes to printers the company is the best source. Repair of printers takes just too much attention to detail and each one is different. Just destroyed a nice printer TWO weeks AGO because I did not pay attention to a detail. |
|
| 11428. |
Solve : 3Gb RAM but my PC is halting? |
|
Answer» ASUS A8N-SLI Premium 939 NVIDIA nForce4 SLI ATX AMD Motherboard uh, that kind of an answer REALLY helps out ....by the way I have been using TwnMOSS a lot of years without any problems... Have you run MemTest on the RAM? See if it has problems. Even if it does have problems- it might not be the memory-it could also be the PSU or even the wall socket. Quote from: spacecat9 on January 18, 2009, 12:14:13 AM So its not the motherboard so as refereed to earlyer i would check the slot and also check that you running memory of the same speed eg ddr800 or ddr1024. it may cause and issue on certain board however usually the board will default to the slower setting. you mean ddr1066? DDR266 = PC2100 DDR333 = PC2700 DDR400 = PC3200 DDR2-400 = PC2-3200 DDR2-533 = PC2-4200 DDR2-667 = PC2-5300 DDR2-800 = PC2-6400 DDR3-800 = PC3-6400 DDR3-1066 = PC3-8500 DDR3-1333 = PC3-10600 DDR3-1600 = PC3-12800 Quote from: Peterwolfe on January 17, 2009, 04:07:50 PM uh, that kind of an answer REALLY helps out ....by the way I have been using TwnMOSS a lot of years without any problems... Well i wish you luck... Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 18, 2009, 01:09:23 AM DDR266 = PC2100 Missed out on DDR2-1066 PC2 8500 ok, will try all those suggestions, cool answers I can work with...and my old packlist says: DDR-DIMM PC3200 512 Mb DDR CL2.5 Memory 184-P (for DDR-PC400Mhz) Spacecat9: ...in control panel- administration tools - system configuration - select the boot tab - " not visible in XPMEMtest ok, no errors, used only 1 time run at 1024, 2048 and 3000Mb with complete coverage TRIED today with RAMcleaner and that software just gives 2048Mb free, so NOT a word about the rest of the 3gbs...lol....more and more confusing... |
|
| 11429. |
Solve : No "Fn key" on Microsoft IntelliType Pro keyboard - which key can I use?? |
|
Answer» I am trying to GET my computer hooked up to my TV to play movies from my hard drive. Doesn't the thing have a TV controller that can do everything other that bake bread?What is "the thing" you refer to? The TV? The computer??Your new TV has a controller. And you do not control it via the S-video output. Your video card has two outputs. Right? The reference to a Fn key is for a laptop.A dual output Video card does not have to switch between the outputs. Some laptops also allow you to use both at the same time. The Fn function is standard on many laptops. I never heard of a desktop video card that wants you to hit the Fn key. What document were you reading. The documentation for the TV? Anyway, it should work with not problem. It is when you have a laptop it is a problem. |
|
| 11430. |
Solve : Sector Zero nuked out, why???? |
|
Answer» Ok, About a week or two ago I was minding my own business on the computer, doing what I usually do, listen to music, talk to people, dream hop on Furcadia, talk to people on there. (which is a Multi-User Chat Kingdom or MUCK)... What do you think? 1. Hardware fails 2 . Clay tablets written three thousand years ago and buried in the sand are still legible. A Computer built a month ago can become unusable even in a warm same place. 3. Make backups. Whill not prevent the problem, but you have a path to recovery. Also, get a warranty with any electronics you buy. recovery console. fixmbr and fixboot. chkdsk. REBOOT. Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 19, 2009, 08:17:22 PM recovery console. fixmbr and fixboot. chkdsk. reboot. I've done that. No luck. Well, start with the power supply. It may not be the power supply, but it is nice to have a spare on hard. Try disconnecting about everything you can thing of. USB gadgets. USB hub. Wireless PCI, CD-Drive. Floppy Maybe your video card. Go back to the built in VGA. Loose cables. Oh yeah. Lose BIOS chip. Really. The pins get a little dirty after a year in the wetlands. Just wiggle it a bit. OH! Memory chips. Take out the big 2GB thing and just try the old 256 that always worked. This is all standard trouble shooting stuff. Maybe loose power connector. Really. Sometimes they get hot and the SOLDER runs off. No joke. Check the power connector on the hard drive. They get loose. Nobody knows why. They just do. Or the data cable. |
|
| 11431. |
Solve : Install XP on old Dell Desktop? |
|
Answer» I want to Install XP on old Dell Desktop. It came to me with XP home on it. The system is becoming difficult and SLOW, so I want to re install XP on it. What is the name of that Dell CD?Here is a picture: http://geek9pm.com/recovery_cd.png As you can see it says re installation CD for XP Pron SP2 since the PC came with ME, the Dell CD won't work... It will install drivers for whatever model(s) the CD was designed for. you'd be best going with the Retail XP CD to install; which you've said boots properly. you're in luck with an older PC at least on one count- XP will find and install all the proper drivers for most of your hardware right off the bat. (note I said Proper... not newest ) Quote since the PC came with ME, the Dell CD won't work... It will install drivers for whatever model(s) the CD was designed for. Thanks. I will just have to use the standard XP with it. The Dell L866r is a P3 machine. In theory, it is 'Vista Ready', or so it says in a book I have! My sister-in-law gave me the machine with no CDs. I have no way of knowing how she got XP on it. And when I went on-line it would pass the WGA thing and let me do downloads! It even did the SP3 on-line. After that, it got weird. So I wanted to replace it with a Dell SP2. But the Dell CD is for another machine will not install on this old L866r! This does not make SENSE. I have not been drinking. I took my medicine today. Can a computer go insane? It is DRIVING me insane! Anyway, I got it up and running find with my standard XP SP2 with no issue.I am not going to put SP3 on it for sure! "Vista ready"... it doesn't even meet the requirements! sneaky manufacturers I'm confused though- what doesn't make sense? Code: [Select]I'm confused though- what doesn't make sense? Huh No I am the kone that is confused. She gave me the L866r "as is" wit no CDs. But ishe is not the tech type. I don't think she put XP one it. It had XP Home. But the COA on the side was for ME. I just supposed that it must have been an upgrade from Dell. Well, if it was, the standard Dell recovery CD is not the right CD for the upgrade. I think they should have a policy that besides having the COA on the side of the machine, there should be a CD pasted inside the cover. Or something like that. Either that or the Windows core system should be in ROM and can not be zapped by any kind of bad software. I just got another Dell system with XP pro with a P4 HT and it does NOT have a disk, But in my collection of OEM OS I have two Dell disks. I wonder if either of them will work on my new Dell. I was told they work on all Dell machines. I would guess any Dell L866r with a P3 does not qualify. Oh well, I didn't like iti very much anyway. Maybe I will put Linux on it. If you go to the Dell web site, They tell you how to make a Windows restore CD from the system you have installed. I am going to have to do that for the new machine before I get on the internet. But I have to get on the internet to download the package! Is that a catch 22? Maybe nest week. I need time to think this over. You could always *try* the disk. It is, after all- worth a shot. If you had a standard OEM XP CD, I would go with that. the recovery disks provided by Dell would LIKELY revert back to when it was new. (AKA: bundled crapware galore). Remember the original IBM PC, and how it had BASIC right in the ROM? That was pretty neat, IMO... especially since even floppy drives were prohibitively expensive. Quote Either that or the Windows core system should be in ROMalthough I can see what you mean... how would that work for Linux or other OS's though? It would be neat if the core boot files could be "flashed" to an EPROM chip on the motherboard- and a jumper required to change what is on the chip, too. the dell utility would (if it even works, who knows) likely create a system restore CD for windows ME. Quote It would be neat if the core boot files could be "flashed" to an EPROM chip on the motherboard- and a jumper required to change what is on the chip, too.I JUST HAD A FLASH! NO Jumpers! A mercury switch! Lay the case down, horizontal to BRING up Windows! Upright and it starts in Linux! Get it? When you are lazy, put the box in the horizontal position! Would that work on a laptop Quote from: Geek-9pm on January 16, 2009, 07:38:12 PM QuoteIt would be neat if the core boot files could be "flashed" to an EPROM chip on the motherboard- and a jumper required to change what is on the chip, too.I JUST HAD A FLASH! did you take your pills today? I was late taking my pills today. So I drank more coffee to make up for it. I will be here until about 1 am. |
|
| 11432. |
Solve : RDRAM Question: difference between pc800 and pc800-45? |
|
Answer» Hi, |
|
| 11433. |
Solve : need more help buying new coputer? |
|
Answer» Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM Quote from: Track on January 15, 2009, 10:57:17 PMOh for the love of.. not this again. It seems like every few months I have rain in the newbies on this forum. It's amazing how useless logic is in the PC realm without experience. You, sir, can no longer be my friend. Oh, and for the 295, since I take that as a personal insult for I intend to buy one - the GTX 295 is composed of two 55nm GT200 cores. If you remember from a while back the GTX 280 was king by a long shot. When they released the 4870X2, GTX 280 SLi still ruled by the same difference. Now, when they release GTX 280 SLi that can clock higher and maintain better latency on a single board, the only thing keeping the GTX 295 from a 20-25% difference in performance is the crappy drivers. This, my little friend, cannot be understood with logic alone, but rather with experience which you do not have and cannot understand nor comprehend. Furthermore, the Superscalar architecture on the RV770 core is still something I'm iffy about, even whilst considering the awesome amount of ALU's, and thus the GTX 295 is currently the only good choice. In about a week, its price will fall to just 5% higher than the 4870X2, mark my words, and the drivers will get their 25% performance difference, and if you had a heart, a soul or a brain, you'd feel pretty *censored* stupid for going up against ME. Quote from: Track on January 16, 2009, 06:46:34 PM It's amazing how useless logic is in the PC realm without experience. You, sir, can no longer be my friend. experience? you mean, "use the newest card, motherboard, and CPU you can buy. I don't care if you can afford it" doesn't say much about experience. it's called getting the most bang for ones buck. Not buying just manufactured video cards and CPU's at sky-high prices simply for the month long thrill of having the best available. The feeling wears off when, a week later, the price is less then half of what it was. Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 16, 2009, 06:50:11 PM Quote from: Track on January 16, 2009, 06:46:34 PMIt's amazing how useless logic is in the PC realm without experience. You, sir, can no longer be my friend. Oh you.. say, does anybody want my top of the line ATI 3d Rage Pro? it has a overwhelming 8192 kilobytes of VRAM. exhilaratingly slow speed, and completely unReliable Drivers. I'll trade it for either a old cat or a comb. Trades for old bits of fluff or string will be considered as well.Oh, to heck with it. I'm having too much fun! Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM Where do I begin?Well, you could get yourself a flame retardant umbrella, my fine friend. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM Windows uses as many threads as it can, ok, but windows doesn't really require 4 threads.Require? What does that even mean? Windows will run twice as fast with twice as many cores. Vista especially. You have a Quad-core CPU - look at the load on each core. It's half what it would be if you used a Dual-core CPU, or disabled half your cores. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM I'm not saying a quad core is a waste, I use one personally, and this certainly wasn't intended as a personal attack which you seem to have taken it as.Oh, but I am sure that it was intended now. At least I sure hope so! Otherwise this counterattack will seem unjust, and then I'll have to leave this barren interwebs-related world and retreat to the cavern side where wine and my woman await for me. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM You say they have the same clocks when overclocking, but you do realize that buying a board that can overclock efficiently will bump up the price even more. This specific person is probably new to the overclocking scene, seeing as how he is hesitant to peice his computer together himself.Are you suggesting that Quad-Core CPU's have lower clocks at stock and thus require overclocking to reach the same clock speeds as Dual-Core CPU's? That's ridiculous. You barely need an overclocking board to overclock by 10%, and even if you set it at stock, 4 cores will still beat 2 where it counts and where it does not, the cores would still be powerful enough to handle anything, for single-threaded application do not require much power. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM As far as intels new i7 line (first off LOL for even bringing that up) those are intended to be used as high end cpus.Let me guess, you saw "i7" and thought "I can't afford the newest tech." Well, guess what - the i7 920 only costs 300$, that's the same price as a good Yorkfield. The only difference is you need more expensive boards and RAM, but as I have debated with many people over this matter - it's worth it. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM That's like asking why Cadillac doesn't release a car from the 1980's next to their escalades.Well, I'm sure your knowledge of automobiles is quite intriguing in many circles, but to us low-down simple capacitator-infused hard-wire circuit fanboys, it's all a bit high-tech. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM The single core comparison is, again, an ineffective one because both of us are aware that games require more than a single core CPU at this point which would be the reason for not purchasing one. Unless of course you didn't notice that, in which case I'm glad I could fill you in.What games are those? You'll be surprised as to how many games and programs still only make use of a single core. In fact, more do than any other. And the line of games that used only 2 cores were few, back in 2005-2006. Now its either 3-4 cores or only a single core. And if you're arguing that CPU manufacturers make CPU's based solely on game performance, then why are you even against a Quad-core? That's its main use! Oh, and thank you for filling me in. I.. don't know where I'd be without n00bs mouthing off at me. And I mean that seriously. Quote from: ThrowingShapes on January 16, 2009, 10:36:47 AM Oh and you not being somebodies friend will make them reconsider their purchase I'm sure.Reconsider their purchase nothing! Why, it should have them falling down to their knees in heavy flowing tears over their cowardly and unrighteous mistake. In fact, you should be weeping right now just for.. well, being the sarcastic dipshit you are. Have a nice day. I know I will. Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 16, 2009, 06:56:29 PM say, does anybody want my top of the line ATI 3d Rage Pro? it has a overwhelming 8192 kilobytes of VRAM. exhilaratingly slow speed, and completely unReliable Drivers. I'll trade it for either a old cat or a comb. Oh shoot, I had a used cat but I eated her. Now all I has are two bottle rockets and a piece of silly string attached to what appears to be a long, smooth shaft.. of styropfoam, made to look like a piece of candy. Quote Windows will run twice as fast with twice as many cores.not true for synchronization reasons... it will run faster, but only when you have four programs doing something CPU intensive at once... Burning a CD, building a BSP tree on a large doom map... two malware processes.... ETC... It could also benefit programs with multiple threads (IMO... multiple threads just means a lack of skill by the programmer. It introduces WAY more problems then it solves). But- most people don't run four CPU intensive programs most of the time. They use one program while another sits in the background idle. web servers, will get the full performance gain out of extra processors, since they almost always sit at 100%... they would be able to service that many requests simultaneously) Does doubling the core increase performance? Basically, you can creates statistics that prove any point of view... one could code something in such a way as to run slower on multiple cores (use up a both prefetch caches with a large amount of flow control and JMP's, etc) and in fact some programs are simply badly designed for multiple cores. the actual increase in performance decreases logarithmically as you add more cores. (for example, 8 Cores would be about 10% faster then 4, but costs twice as much. (even more since the motherboard probably wouldn't be cheap either) Quote from: Track on January 16, 2009, 07:19:14 PM Are you suggesting that Quad-Core CPU's have lower clocks at stock and thus require overclocking to reach the same clock speeds as Dual-Core CPU's? That's ridiculous. Well lets take a look at that, shall we? Quote from: Track on January 15, 2009, 10:57:17 PM You'd reach pretty much the same clocks by overclocking. You'd get no worse performance. You'd spend almost the same amount of money. Doh. After this blatant contradiction, I feel no need to continue mocking your uninformed posts. In addition to this member ranting about his supposed knowledge (which I guess goes as far as "buy the most expensive parts" and "whats's a budget") I've been looking at a potential build for you. Monitor:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824005119 ~$210 OS: Well I can't really suggest one to you. I presonally like Vista over xp for gaming, and wether or not you want 32 or 64 bit is up to you. ~$120 PSU:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341002 ~$50 after MIR Case:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811144205~$85 after MIR, I've heard it was a pretty good case for the price. DVD/CD drive: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827135176 ~$20 There's a few cheaper ones, but I trust Asus more than LiteOn. HDD:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136283 ~$90 750gb would likely be enough for gaming, don't know how many games you own, but I wouldn't expect it to be run out of space quickly. Motherboard: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131339 ~$190 This is a pretty solid board. It is very expandable when you plan to make upgrades further down the road. CPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103249 ~$148 Thought it was a pretty good deal myself, A little power hungry but it gets the job done. RAM: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231184 ~$65 G Skill is pretty reputable. If you intend on running a 32-bit os instead of a 64 however you could always buy less than 4gb, and let your GPU take some heat. GPU: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150339 ~$275 There's been alot of talk about this, especially from tracker. On a 20" monitor, which I recall you metioning, your resolution will be 1680x1050. A 295 will not only cost twice the price, but will not yield much of a performance gain over this card at this resolution. He may not have taken into account that these new high end cards shine at high resolutions/ high AA settings. Or he may have been blinded by blatant ignorance. (or both?) The high end cards simply aren't worth the money at 1680x1050. The 4870 is a pretty nice card, although if you're building this rig to play crysis (but who would ever build a rig just to run crysis?) you can always upgrade to a 4870x2 or the 295 . Be aware that the 4870x2 will eat power supplies alive if given the chance, I wouldn't suggest one under 650-700. Cooling: Well I don't know what you like but here's a link to newegg.com The case above comes with fans from what I saw, but you can always get a new CPU cooler if it's running to hot. This rig will run you $1255, giving you $245 left over, from the $1500 budget. If you wanted to, you could probably add water cooling with the extra money, although it probably isn't really needed with the rig above. Hope this helps, and I apologize for arguing with Tracker on your topic, but somebody had to do it. Sorry if I missed anything just yell at me, it's late. |
|
| 11434. |
Solve : Western Digital external hard drive stops running after a few hours.? |
|
Answer» OS: Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit |
|
| 11435. |
Solve : unreadable Hard Drive with prior freeze up problems? |
|
Answer» This is my first post on this site. I have some knowledge of computers and programs and have worked on them for some time, but now I am really stuck. The BIOS settings see the drive It is an IDE drive the LBA is on and BLK Mod on;this. Windows will do this to a drive when there are more than 5 or 6 consecutive read/write errors to protect the drive and itself. Since it's the slowest possible transfer rate even a DOS based app may have hiccups that would not allow you to finish your work. Might not be a fix but i would try this...hook up the drive as a slave on a working Windows machine. Run chkdsk /r again on it just to be sure. Then travel Here and skip all the Hotfix listed and scroll down to the workaround instructions to get the drive back out of PIO mode. As i stated no promises on the results but you may wind up rescuing a perfectly good drive. Best of Luck. I will give that a try. I have to get my husband off the working computer to do so. So I expect not today. I will get back to you. Thanks.I got another suggestion and tried that first because it is difficult for me to remove the drive with my broken leg. I thought I might better try something first. I took an ME startup disk and tried to do a debug. Would not read the command. I did a dir and the fdisk was on the ME startup so i tried that command. It worked. I was thinking all would be well, but it would not let me format the drive. Don't worry I used the correct commands. Anyway after playing around for a while I decided to stick in my Drive Works again. Wala! The program was now working. I gues the fdisk got that to work. In drive works I tried to just do a format as it saw the drive. No luck it froze up again. Well then I decided to go ahead and try and erase the drive again, but this time with a less secure erase as the secure erase takes forever and there was nothing on the drive to worry about. So this time no freeze ups! It is still running and has about an hour to go. I will then try the partition and format in the Drive Works program and pray that the monster does not freeze. If all that fails I will take out the drive and check for manufacture utilities on line. I think I am going brain dead because I can not remember how to print out my specs on the hardware. Maybe the brain bruse from the accident has finally gotten to me!! I have done this before, but just plain don't remember. Could you give me directions on that? I would print them out for my other computers and the ones the office when I can go back to work. Thanks in advance. I will post the progress tomorrow. This is very time consuming, but right now with my broken leg I have a lot of time on my hands! Quote from: COOKJAN on January 16, 2009, 05:52:28 PM I took an ME startup disk and tried to do a debug. err.... why? |
|
| 11436. |
Solve : Added RAM causing blue screen errors.? |
|
Answer» Help! I have only gotten the run AROUND with all other tech help. I have a Gateway desktop, running Windows XP, version 2002, service pack 3 (will return to this later). It is a basic setup with an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.66GHz, 2.67GHz, 192 MB of RAM. I wanted to add 1 GB of RAM and was told not to worry about anything, just install and my computer would recognize the upgrade. At first, all was well. My computer was faster and all worked fine. However, after about 24 hours, a blue screen error would pop up and SHUT my computer off. Then, Windows tried to do a Sevice Pack 3 upgrade, which had already been done, but computer would not allow without using the start-up disc (I NEVER RECEIVED a start-up disc for windows XP because it was pre-installed). Gateway went though a patial buyout and the company, MPC is going through Chapter 11 and I cannot get help from them. I have been told to adjust my BIOS, but HOW and to WHAT adjustments? try removing the old ram and just use the one gig. sounds like youve got both in there.Spacecat9, First off, thanks for replying. Secondly, can I just replace the original RAM? I have a 2 DIMM slot and #2 is open. Also, I was told I could add up to 2GB, but didn't want to push it. Last, but not least, once old RAM is out, new RAM installed, will computer and operating system acknowledge and allow upgrades without installing start-up disc? Really, I mean it when I say "Thanks!" You are the only advice I've gotten.yeah it should. many machine funtion best when both ram chip are the same size spacecat9 is correct, and there is no reason to worry about old RAM. 1gig is plenty for XP. |
|
| 11437. |
Solve : CD drive stopped working? |
|
Answer» Hello, |
|
| 11438. |
Solve : Wireless PCI card? |
|
Answer» I am planning on BUYING a Linksys WMP54G wireless-G PCI CARD, and I would like to know if this will work on a Compaq PRESARIO computer running Windows ME? |
|
| 11439. |
Solve : Exceeded my monitor's resolution?? |
|
Answer» I've GOT an older Gateway gaming machine running Vista Home Premium with an ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT video card, 3 GB RAM and a terabyte of disk. Display is an Acer LCD with specs indicating it will operate up to 1600 x resolution. Everything was WORKING fine until I was poking around in the ATI Catalyst Center looking at the video card settings and noticed a resolution setting I did not remember seeing before - 1900 x - without thinking I clicked on it and immediately regretted it! Instead of getting a question whether I wanted to keep the resolution setting the display freaked out and went dark. I'm thinking I set the video card resolution setting beyond the capabilities of the display and am now suffering the consequences. I can only use the system in safe mode now - if I allow the system to boot in normal mode the display goes back to the dark screen which 'twitches'. I tried 'LAST know good configuration' to no avail. This particular machine does not have a recovery point so that will not help. I am holding off removing/reinstalling drivers in the hope I can fix this in some other WAY while in safe mode - maybe a registry setting change? |
|
| 11440. |
Solve : DVD Burner -- SATA vs IDE?? |
|
Answer» I'm looking at purchasing a DVD/CD burner through Newegg. This is for an older Windows 2000 machine. It WOULD mainly be used for CD burning. APPARENTLY the burner is SATA vs IDE. Not sure what all that means, but do you know whether there would be any compatibility ISSUES with Windows 2000? I know I have to buy a SATA cable separately, but should I have other concerns?Does the MBoard have SATA connectors ? ? |
|
| 11441. |
Solve : Help, my PC has fallen and it can't get up!!!? |
|
Answer» I thought this machine was running Vista... |
|
| 11442. |
Solve : FRUSTRATING charging problem with my HP....? |
|
Answer» I have had enough of this. I need some help. |
|
| 11443. |
Solve : PC turns off and restarts twice the last 2 hours? |
|
Answer» without me knowing why? Was downloading and de-rarring....what could this mean? Just got all my cleaners ready with their jobs, so a clean mean machine....well... No Looper sound...lol...but as you have read, in another post, there are RAM issues....crucial says everything ok...this turning off/on happened after I returned to IE6 from IE7...and yes I restarted .......all temperatures under 35degrC....MEANING HD's, CPU etc |
|
| 11444. |
Solve : Did I not buy enough RAM?? |
|
Answer» I have a Q6600 processor with 4GB of Cosair 1024 speed ram running Vista 64 bit PREMIUM. I have very few things in the backround (just firewall, AV, ect), but my memory never drops below 40% usage just with my firewall and drivers running. |
|
| 11445. |
Solve : Hynix RAM? |
|
Answer» Hey guys. |
|
| 11446. |
Solve : CPU OVERHEAT !!!! ALMOST 90 DEGREES CECIUS? |
|
Answer» I recently installed a NEW Q6600 Quad core 2.40 ghz cpu. it cant be thermal grease because it was a new heatsink and fan module. How does that preclude the problem being thermal grease? Quote from: BC_Programmer on January 19, 2009, 01:06:12 AM Quote from: kizza1645 on January 19, 2009, 12:47:55 AMit cant be thermal grease because it was a new heatsink and fan module. because it was already applied.Are you sure that the heatsink's fan is working? How did you DETERMINE the temperature of the CPU?I use 2 programs which read the temp of each core. I have just bought some new grease, which im going to apply instead of the one which already came aplied but still is this too hot anyway?already came applied? what? I thought you said you got a Heatsink/fan combo?Intel stopped pre-applying thermal compound a LONG long time ago...Thermal Compound GuideAre you using the stock cooler and heatsink? I had the same problem not too long ago with a dual core intel that overheated at 90 celcius and i bought a aftermarket heatsink and fan and my problems went away.It has nothing to do with the difference between a stock cooler or an aftermarket model... I run the stock cooler and Calum is still jealous of my temps...ask him. |
|
| 11447. |
Solve : Terms help? |
|
Answer» I need help inderstanding two Terms and what they meen? |
|
| 11448. |
Solve : Mouse not moving...? |
|
Answer» Hi guys, wondering if anyone can identify my problem? I'm not brilliant on computers, I just point and click. |
|
| 11449. |
Solve : new user? |
|
Answer» Hey guys I am trying to replace a failing ide hard drive with a sata drive using ghost or disk wizard. |
|
| 11450. |
Solve : PCIe and PCI compatibility.? |
|
Answer» Hi, |
|